- Timestamp:
- Jun 20, 2017, 11:19:31 AM (7 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
CLIO/CLIO2017/main.tex
r699 r700 1 \documentclass {article}1 \documentclass[12pt]{article} 2 2 \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} 3 3 \usepackage{graphicx} … … 13 13 \usepackage{tcolorbox} 14 14 \usepackage{lipsum} 15 16 17 \usepackage[top=1in, bottom=1.25in, left=1.25in, right=1.25in]{geometry} 18 19 20 21 22 15 23 \begin{document} 16 24 … … 22 30 23 31 \subsection{Data Acquisition} 24 Data is taken with DAQ board with 250 ksps sampling rate. Python script (read\_ plot\_data.py) Analyze single file with taken data and produce the the array of signals on chosen channels. Noise filtering is implemented inside script. We use simple FFT filtering by turning in zero high frequency component of modulus of FT of the signal. Depth of filtering could be chosen by user.32 Data is taken with DAQ board with 250 ksps sampling rate. Python script (read\_ plot\_data.py) Analyze single file with taken data and produce the the array of signals on chosen channels. Noise filtering is implemented inside script. We use simple FFT filtering by turning in zero high frequency component of modulus of FT of the signal. Depth of filtering could be chosen by user. 25 33 Signal is extracting from filtered data on falling edge of electron signal and computed as difference of signal amplitude at equidistant positions from the edge. This give amplitude on detector when bunch pass grating and with respect to the moment before. 26 34 Except this electron signal amplitude is acquired as simple min. For this type of the signal we remove constant component with FFT and live other components as they are. … … 39 47 \begin{figure}[h!] 40 48 \centering 41 \includegraphics[scale=1.7]{}49 %\includegraphics[scale=1.7]{} 42 50 \caption{} 43 51 \label{} … … 396 404 397 405 398 406 Spectrum change as function of buncher power is presented on figure \ref{shsp2d} and \ref{shsp1d}. With low power of buncher, Its impossible to form good bunch for futher acceleration. 399 407 400 408 \begin{figure}[!htb] … … 404 412 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Spectrum2dBP.eps} 405 413 \caption{} 406 \label{ }414 \label{shsp2d} 407 415 \end{subfigure}% 408 416 \begin{subfigure}{.5\textwidth} … … 410 418 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{SpectrumBP.eps} 411 419 \caption{} 412 \label{ }413 \end{subfigure} 414 \caption{} 415 \label{} 416 \end{figure} 417 418 419 420 \label{shsp1d} 421 \end{subfigure} 422 \caption{} 423 \label{} 424 \end{figure} 425 426 427 On figure \ref{bpff} presented interpolated and extrapolated Form factor. FWHM and FW0.1M not really depend from buncher power, but FW0.9M increase almost twice with decrease of buncher power. That indicate on bad compression. 420 428 421 429 … … 426 434 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{FFfitBP.eps} 427 435 \caption{} 428 \label{ }436 \label{bpff} 429 437 \end{subfigure}% 430 438 \begin{subfigure}{.5\textwidth} … … 437 445 \label{} 438 446 \end{figure} 439 447 Profile evolution is presented on figure \ref{profBP} 440 448 \begin{figure}[!htb] 441 449 \centering … … 453 461 \end{subfigure} 454 462 \caption{} 455 \label{ }456 \end{figure} 457 463 \label{profBP} 464 \end{figure} 465 \clearpage 458 466 \section{Section phase} 459 Using same method, we get:467 Using same method, we obtain follow map for fitting coefficients (see fig. \ref{ampsp} and fig. \ref{evasp}) 460 468 461 469 \begin{figure}[!htb] … … 465 473 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{AMP2dSP.eps} 466 474 \caption{} 467 \label{ }475 \label{ampsp} 468 476 \end{subfigure}% 469 477 \begin{subfigure}{.5\textwidth} … … 471 479 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EvaWSP2d.eps} 472 480 \caption{} 473 \label{ }481 \label{evasp} 474 482 \end{subfigure} 475 483 \caption{} … … 555 563 \label{} 556 564 \end{figure} 565 566 \begin{tcolorbox}[colback=red!5,colframe=red!40!black,title=Take it into account!!!] 567 SEY for 44.2 MeV 568 \end{tcolorbox} 557 569 \begin{figure}[!htb] 558 570 \centering … … 572 584 \label{} 573 585 \end{figure} 574 575 586 \begin{figure}[!htb] 576 587 \centering … … 591 602 \end{figure} 592 603 593 594 595 596 597 604 In this calculation was negleged change of SEY, but even with this assumption we see that profile didnt change a lot, as we espect. Second conclusion: 605 606 \begin{tcolorbox}[colback=red!5,colframe=red!40!black,title=Make this study!!!] 607 Is current setup is sufficient to study change of spectrum as function of bunch energy. 608 \end{tcolorbox} 609 610 611 \clearpage 598 612 599 613 \section{Conclusion}
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.