| 1 | The final state of elastic scattering is described by sampling the differential
|
|---|
| 2 | scattering cross-sections
|
|---|
| 3 | ${{\rm d} \sigma \over {\rm d} \Omega}$.
|
|---|
| 4 | Two representations
|
|---|
| 5 | are supported
|
|---|
| 6 | for the normalised differential cross-section for
|
|---|
| 7 | elastic scattering.
|
|---|
| 8 | The first is a tabulation of the differential cross-section,
|
|---|
| 9 | as a
|
|---|
| 10 | function of the cosine of the scattering angle $\theta$ and the kinetic energy
|
|---|
| 11 | $E$ of the incoming
|
|---|
| 12 | neutron.
|
|---|
| 13 | $${{\rm d} \sigma \over {\rm d} \Omega}~=~
|
|---|
| 14 | {{\rm d} \sigma \over {\rm d} \Omega}\left(\cos{\theta,~E}\right)$$
|
|---|
| 15 | The tabulations used are normalised by $\sigma/(2\pi)$ so the integral of the
|
|---|
| 16 | differential cross-sections over the scattering angle yields unity.
|
|---|
| 17 |
|
|---|
| 18 | In the second representation, the normalised cross-section are represented
|
|---|
| 19 | as a series of legendre polynomials $P_l(\cos{\theta})$, and the
|
|---|
| 20 | legendre coefficients $a_l$ are
|
|---|
| 21 | tabulated as a function of the incoming energy of the neutron.
|
|---|
| 22 | $${2\pi\over\sigma (E)}{{\rm d} \sigma \over {\rm d} \Omega}\left(\cos{\theta,~E}\right)~=~
|
|---|
| 23 | \sum_{l=0}^{n_l} {2l+1\over 2}a_l(E)P_l(\cos{\theta})$$
|
|---|
| 24 |
|
|---|
| 25 | Describing the details of the sampling procedures is outside the scope
|
|---|
| 26 | of this paper.
|
|---|
| 27 |
|
|---|
| 28 | An example of the result we show in figure \ref{elastic} for the elastic
|
|---|
| 29 | scattering of 15~MeV neutrons off Uranium
|
|---|
| 30 | a comparison of the simulated angular distribution of the scattered neutrons
|
|---|
| 31 | with evaluated data.
|
|---|
| 32 | The points are the evaluated data,
|
|---|
| 33 | the histogram is the Monte Carlo prediction.
|
|---|
| 34 |
|
|---|
| 35 | In order to provide full
|
|---|
| 36 | test-coverage for the algorithms, similar tests have been performed for
|
|---|
| 37 | ${\rm^{72}Ge}$,
|
|---|
| 38 | ${\rm^{126}Sn}$,
|
|---|
| 39 | ${\rm^{238}U}$,
|
|---|
| 40 | ${\rm^{4}He}$, and
|
|---|
| 41 | ${\rm^{27}Al}$ for a set of neutron kinetic energies.
|
|---|
| 42 | The agreement is very good for all values of scattering angle and neutron
|
|---|
| 43 | energy investigated.
|
|---|
| 44 | \begin{figure}[b!] % fig 1
|
|---|
| 45 | % \centerline{\epsfig{file=hadronic/lowEnergyNeutron/neutrons/plots/elastic.u238.14mev.costh.epsi,height=5.5in,width=3.5in}}
|
|---|
| 46 | \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.6]{hadronic/lowEnergyNeutron/neutrons/plots/elastic.u238.14mev.costh.epsi}
|
|---|
| 47 | \vspace{10pt}
|
|---|
| 48 | \caption{Comparison of data and Monte Carlo for the angular distribution of
|
|---|
| 49 | 15~MeV neutrons scattered
|
|---|
| 50 | elastically off Uranium ($^{238}U$). The points are evaluated data, and the histogram is
|
|---|
| 51 | the Monte Carlo prediction. The lower plot excludes the forward peak, to better show
|
|---|
| 52 | the Frenel structure of the angular distribution of the scattered neutron.}
|
|---|
| 53 | \label{elastic}
|
|---|
| 54 | \end{figure}
|
|---|