| 1 | For neutron induced fission, we take first chance, second chance, third chance
|
|---|
| 2 | and forth chance fission into account.
|
|---|
| 3 |
|
|---|
| 4 | Neutron yields are tabulated
|
|---|
| 5 | as a function of both the incoming and outgoing neutron energy.
|
|---|
| 6 | The neutron angular distributions are either tabulated, or represented in terms
|
|---|
| 7 | of an expansion in legendre polynomials, similar to the angular distributions
|
|---|
| 8 | for neutron elastic scattering. In case no data are available on the angular
|
|---|
| 9 | distribution, isotropic emission in the centre of mass system of the collision
|
|---|
| 10 | is assumed.
|
|---|
| 11 |
|
|---|
| 12 | There are six different possibilities implemented to represent the neutron
|
|---|
| 13 | energy distributions. The energy distribution of the fission neutrons
|
|---|
| 14 | $f(E\rightarrow E')$
|
|---|
| 15 | can be tabulated as a normalised
|
|---|
| 16 | function of the incoming and outgoing neutron energy, again using the ENDF/B-VI
|
|---|
| 17 | interpolation schemes to minimise data volume and maximise precision.
|
|---|
| 18 |
|
|---|
| 19 | The energy distribution can also be represented
|
|---|
| 20 | as a general evaporation spectrum,
|
|---|
| 21 | $$f(E\rightarrow E')~=~f\left(E'/\Theta(E)\right).$$
|
|---|
| 22 | Here $E$ is the energy of the incoming neutron, $E'$ is the energy of a fission
|
|---|
| 23 | neutron, and $\Theta(E)$ is effective temperature used to characterise the
|
|---|
| 24 | secondary neutron energy distribution. Both the effective temperature and the
|
|---|
| 25 | functional behaviour of the energy distribution are taken from tabulations.
|
|---|
| 26 |
|
|---|
| 27 | Alternatively energy distribution can be represented
|
|---|
| 28 | as a Maxwell spectrum, $$f(E\rightarrow E')~\propto~\sqrt{E'}{\rm e}^{E'/\Theta(E)},$$
|
|---|
| 29 | or a evaporation spectrum
|
|---|
| 30 | $$f(E\rightarrow E')~\propto~E'{\rm e}^{E'/\Theta(E)}.$$
|
|---|
| 31 | In both these cases, the temperature is tabulated as a function of the incoming
|
|---|
| 32 | neutron energy.
|
|---|
| 33 |
|
|---|
| 34 | The last two options are the energy dependent Watt spectrum, and the Madland
|
|---|
| 35 | Nix spectrum. For the energy dependent Watt spectrum, the energy distribution
|
|---|
| 36 | is represented as
|
|---|
| 37 | $$f(E\rightarrow E')~\propto~{\rm e}^{-E'/a(E)}\sinh{\sqrt{b(E)E'}}.$$
|
|---|
| 38 | Here both the parameters a, and b are used from tabulation as function of the
|
|---|
| 39 | incoming neutron energy.
|
|---|
| 40 | In the case of the Madland Nix spectrum, the energy distribution is described
|
|---|
| 41 | as
|
|---|
| 42 | $$f(E\rightarrow E')~=~{1\over 2}\left[g(E',<K_l>)~+~g(E',<K_h>)\right].$$
|
|---|
| 43 | Here
|
|---|
| 44 | $$g(E',<K>)~=~ {1\over 3\sqrt{<K>\Theta}}\left[u_2^{3/2}E_1(u_2)-u_1^{3/2}E_1(u_1)
|
|---|
| 45 | +\gamma(3/2, u_2) - \gamma(3/2, u_1)\right],$$
|
|---|
| 46 | $$ u_1(E',<K>) = {(\sqrt{E'}-\sqrt{<K>})^2 \over \Theta},~{\rm and}$$
|
|---|
| 47 | $$ u_2(E',<K>) = {(\sqrt{E'}+\sqrt{<K>})^2 \over \Theta}.$$
|
|---|
| 48 | Here $K_l$ is the kinetic energy of light fragments and $K_h$ the kinetic energy
|
|---|
| 49 | of heavy fragments, $E_1(x)$ is the exponential integral, and $\gamma(x)$ is the
|
|---|
| 50 | incomplete gamma function. The mean kinetic energies for light and heavy
|
|---|
| 51 | fragments are assumed to be energy independent.
|
|---|
| 52 | The temperature $\Theta$ is tabulated as a function of the kinetic
|
|---|
| 53 | energy of the incoming neutron.
|
|---|
| 54 |
|
|---|
| 55 | Fission photons are describes in analogy to capture photons, where evaluated
|
|---|
| 56 | data are available. The measured nuclear excitation levels and transition
|
|---|
| 57 | probabilities are used otherwise, if available.
|
|---|
| 58 |
|
|---|
| 59 | As an example of the results is shown in figure\ref{fission} the energy
|
|---|
| 60 | distribution of the fission neutrons in third chance fission
|
|---|
| 61 | of 15~MeV neutrons on Uranium ($^{238}$U). This distribution contains two
|
|---|
| 62 | evaporation spectra and one Watt spectrum.
|
|---|
| 63 | Similar comparisons for neutron yields, energy and angular distributions, and
|
|---|
| 64 | well as fission photon yields, energy and angular distributions have
|
|---|
| 65 | been performed for
|
|---|
| 66 | ${\rm^{238}U}$,
|
|---|
| 67 | ${\rm^{235}U}$,
|
|---|
| 68 | ${\rm^{234}U}$, and
|
|---|
| 69 | ${\rm^{241}Am}$
|
|---|
| 70 | for a set of incoming neutron energies.
|
|---|
| 71 | In all cases the agreement between evaluated data and Monte Carlo is very good.
|
|---|
| 72 |
|
|---|
| 73 | \begin{figure}[b!] % fig 1
|
|---|
| 74 | % \centerline{\epsfig{file=hadronic/lowEnergyNeutron/neutrons/plots/fissionu238.tc.15mev.energy.epsi,height=3.5in,width=3.5in}}
|
|---|
| 75 | \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.6]{hadronic/lowEnergyNeutron/neutrons/plots/fissionu238.tc.15mev.energy.epsi}
|
|---|
| 76 | \vspace{10pt}
|
|---|
| 77 | \caption{Comparison of data and Monte Carlo for fission neutron energy
|
|---|
| 78 | distributions for induced fission by 15~MeV neutrons on Uranium ($^{238}U$).
|
|---|
| 79 | The curve represents evaluated data and the histogram is
|
|---|
| 80 | the Monte Carlo prediction.}
|
|---|
| 81 | \label{fission}
|
|---|
| 82 | \end{figure}
|
|---|
| 83 |
|
|---|
| 84 |
|
|---|