% \subsection{Neutron production}

% \begin{figure}[tbp]
% \resizebox{0.95\textwidth}{!}
% {
%    \includegraphics{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsde_256.eps}
% }
% \caption{1}
% \label{nSigma}
% \end{figure}
% 
% \begin{figure}[tbp]
% \resizebox{0.95\textwidth}{!}
% {
%    \includegraphics{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_256_7.5.eps}
% }
% \caption{2}
% \label{nSigma}
% \end{figure}
% 

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
  \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_al_113.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for neutrons produced in proton
scattering off Aluminum. Proton incident energy was 113~MeV.
}
\label{nSigma.BC}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}   
  \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_al_256.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for neutrons produced in proton
scattering off Aluminum. Proton incident energy was 256~MeV. The points
are data, the histogram is Binary Cascade prediction.
}
\label{dsdedt_al_256}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}   
   \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_al_600.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for neutrons produced in proton
scattering off Aluminum. Proton incident energy was 597~MeV. The points
are data, the histogram is Binary Cascade prediction.
}
\label{dsdedt_al_600}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
  \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_al_800.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for neutrons produced in proton
scattering off Aluminum. Proton incident energy was 800~MeV. The points
are data, the histogram is Binary Cascade prediction.
}
\label{dsdedt_al_800}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
  \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_fe_113.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for neutrons produced in proton
scattering off Iron. Proton incident energy was 113~MeV. The points
are data, the histogram is Binary Cascade prediction.
}
\label{dsdedt_fe_113}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
  \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_fe_256.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for neutrons produced in proton
scattering off Iron. Proton incident energy was 256~MeV. The points
are data, the histogram is Binary Cascade prediction.
}
\label{dsdedt_fe_256}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
  \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_fe_600.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for neutrons produced in proton
scattering off Iron. Proton incident energy was 597~MeV. The points
are data, the histogram is Binary Cascade prediction.
}
\label{dsdedt_fe_600}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
  \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_fe_800.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for neutrons produced in proton
scattering off Iron. Proton incident energy was 800~MeV. The points
are data, the histogram is Binary Cascade prediction.
}
\label{dsdedt_fe_800}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
  \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_pb_113.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for neutrons produced in proton
scattering off Lead. Proton incident energy was 113~MeV. The points
are data, the histogram is Binary Cascade prediction.
}
\label{dsdedt_pb_113}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
  \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_pb_256.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for neutrons produced in proton
scattering off Lead. Proton incident energy was 256~MeV. The points
are data, the histogram is Binary Cascade prediction.
}
\label{dsdedt_pb_256}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
  \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_pb_600.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for neutrons produced in proton
scattering off Lead. Proton incident energy was 597~MeV. The points
are data, the histogram is Binary Cascade prediction.
}
\label{dsdedt_pb_600}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
  \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/dsdedt_pb_800.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for neutrons produced in proton
scattering off Lead. Proton incident energy was 800~MeV. The points
are data, the histogram is Binary Cascade prediction.
}
\label{dsdedt_pb_800}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
  \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{hadronic/theory_driven/BinaryCascade/pi_45.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Double differential cross-section for pions produced at $45^\circ$ in proton
scattering off various materials. Proton incident energy was 597~MeV in each
case. The points are data, the histogram is Binary Cascade prediction.
}
\label{pi_45}
\end{figure}


% - Angle integrated energy distributions @ 160 MeV for Al, Zr, Pb
% - Quasi-elastic peaks @ 256 MeV all materials
% - double differentials: Al, Fe, Pb; all angles, 113, 160, 256, 595,800 MeV
