source: HiSusy/trunk/Pythia8/pythia8170/phpdoc/Fragmentation.php @ 1

Last change on this file since 1 was 1, checked in by zerwas, 11 years ago

first import of structure, PYTHIA8 and DELPHES

File size: 21.2 KB
Line 
1<html>
2<head>
3<title>Fragmentation</title>
4<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="pythia.css"/>
5<link rel="shortcut icon" href="pythia32.gif"/>
6</head>
7<body>
8
9<script language=javascript type=text/javascript>
10function stopRKey(evt) {
11var evt = (evt) ? evt : ((event) ? event : null);
12var node = (evt.target) ? evt.target :((evt.srcElement) ? evt.srcElement : null);
13if ((evt.keyCode == 13) && (node.type=="text"))
14{return false;}
15}
16
17document.onkeypress = stopRKey;
18</script>
19<?php
20if($_POST['saved'] == 1) {
21if($_POST['filepath'] != "files/") {
22echo "<font color='red'>SETTINGS SAVED TO FILE</font><br/><br/>"; }
23else {
24echo "<font color='red'>NO FILE SELECTED YET.. PLEASE DO SO </font><a href='SaveSettings.php'>HERE</a><br/><br/>"; }
25}
26?>
27
28<form method='post' action='Fragmentation.php'>
29
30<h2>Fragmentation</h2>
31
32Fragmentation in PYTHIA is based on the Lund string model
33[<a href="Bibliography.php" target="page">And83, Sjo84</a>]. Several different aspects are involved in
34the physics description, which  here therefore is split accordingly.
35This also, at least partly, reflect the set of classes involved in
36the fragmentation machinery.
37
38<p/>
39The variables collected here have a very wide span of usefulness.
40Some would be central in any hadronization tuning exercise, others
41should not be touched except by experts.
42
43<p/>
44The fragmentation flavour-choice machinery is also used in a few
45other places of the program, notably particle decays, and is thus
46described on the separate <?php $filepath = $_GET["filepath"];
47echo "<a href='FlavourSelection.php?filepath=".$filepath."' target='page'>";?>Flavour
48Selection</a> page.
49
50<h3>Fragmentation functions</h3>
51
52The <code>StringZ</code> class handles the choice of longitudinal
53lightcone fraction <i>z</i> according to one of two possible
54shape sets.
55
56<p/>
57The Lund symmetric fragmentation function [<a href="Bibliography.php" target="page">And83</a>] is the
58only alternative for light quarks. It is of the form
59<br/><i> 
60    f(z) = (1/z) * (1-z)^a * exp(-b m_T^2 / z)
61</i><br/>
62with the two main free parameters <i>a</i> and <i>b</i> to be
63tuned to data. They are stored in
64
65<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringZ:aLund </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="1" value="0.3" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>0.3</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.0</code>; <code>maximum = 2.0</code>)</td></tr></table>
66The <i>a</i> parameter of the Lund symmetric fragmentation function.
67 
68
69<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringZ:bLund </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="2" value="0.8" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>0.8</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.2</code>; <code>maximum = 2.0</code>)</td></tr></table>
70The <i>b</i> parameter of the Lund symmetric fragmentation function.
71 
72
73<p/>
74In principle, each flavour can have a different <i>a</i>. Then,
75for going from an old flavour <i>i</i> to a new <i>j</i> one
76the shape is
77<br/><i> 
78    f(z) = (1/z) * z^{a_i} * ((1-z)/z)^{a_j} * exp(-b * m_T^2 / z)
79</i><br/>
80This is only implemented for diquarks relative to normal quarks:
81
82<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringZ:aExtraDiquark </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="3" value="0.5" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>0.5</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.0</code>; <code>maximum = 2.0</code>)</td></tr></table>
83allows a larger <i>a</i> for diquarks, with total
84<i>a = aLund + aExtraDiquark</i>.
85 
86
87<p/>
88Finally, the Bowler modification [<a href="Bibliography.php" target="page">Bow81</a>] introduces an extra
89factor
90<br/><i>
91    1/z^{r_Q * b * m_Q^2}
92</i><br/>
93for heavy quarks. To keep some flexibility, a multiplicative factor
94<i>r_Q</i> is introduced, which ought to be unity (provided that
95quark masses were uniquely defined) but can be set in
96
97<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringZ:rFactC </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="4" value="1.0" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>1.0</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.0</code>; <code>maximum = 2.0</code>)</td></tr></table>
98<i>r_c</i>, i.e. the above parameter for <i>c</i> quarks.
99 
100
101<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringZ:rFactB </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="5" value="0.67" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>0.67</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.0</code>; <code>maximum = 2.0</code>)</td></tr></table>
102<i>r_b</i>, i.e. the above parameter for <i>b</i> quarks.
103 
104
105<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringZ:rFactH </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="6" value="1.0" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>1.0</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.0</code>; <code>maximum = 2.0</code>)</td></tr></table>
106<i>r_h</i>, i.e. the above parameter for heavier hypothetical quarks,
107or in general any new coloured particle long-lived enough to hadronize.
108 
109
110<p/>
111As an alternative, it is possible to switch over to the
112Peterson/SLAC formula [<a href="Bibliography.php" target="page">Pet83</a>]
113<br/><i>
114     f(z) = 1 / ( z * (1 - 1/z - epsilon/(1-z))^2 )
115</i><br/>
116for charm, bottom and heavier (defined as above) by the three flags
117
118<br/><br/><strong>StringZ:usePetersonC</strong>  <input type="radio" name="7" value="on"><strong>On</strong>
119<input type="radio" name="7" value="off" checked="checked"><strong>Off</strong>
120 &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>off</strong></code>)<br/>
121use Peterson for <i>c</i> quarks.
122 
123
124<br/><br/><strong>StringZ:usePetersonB</strong>  <input type="radio" name="8" value="on"><strong>On</strong>
125<input type="radio" name="8" value="off" checked="checked"><strong>Off</strong>
126 &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>off</strong></code>)<br/>
127use Peterson for <i>b</i> quarks.
128 
129
130<br/><br/><strong>StringZ:usePetersonH</strong>  <input type="radio" name="9" value="on"><strong>On</strong>
131<input type="radio" name="9" value="off" checked="checked"><strong>Off</strong>
132 &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>off</strong></code>)<br/>
133use Peterson for hypothetical heavier quarks.
134 
135
136<p/>
137When switched on, the corresponding epsilon values are chosen to be
138
139<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringZ:epsilonC </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="10" value="0.05" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>0.05</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.01</code>; <code>maximum = 0.25</code>)</td></tr></table>
140<i>epsilon_c</i>, i.e. the above parameter for <i>c</i> quarks.
141 
142
143<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringZ:epsilonB </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="11" value="0.005" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>0.005</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.001</code>; <code>maximum = 0.025</code>)</td></tr></table>
144<i>epsilon_b</i>, i.e. the above parameter for <i>b</i> quarks.
145 
146
147<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringZ:epsilonH </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="12" value="0.005" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>0.005</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.0001</code>; <code>maximum = 0.25</code>)</td></tr></table>
148<i>epsilon_h</i>, i.e. the above parameter for hypothetical heavier
149quarks, normalized to the case where <i>m_h = m_b</i>. The actually
150used parameter is then <i>epsilon = epsilon_h * (m_b^2 / m_h^2)</i>.
151This allows a sensible scaling to a particle with an unknown higher
152mass without the need for a user intervention.
153 
154
155<h3>Fragmentation <i>pT</i></h3>
156
157The <code>StringPT</code> class handles the choice of fragmentation
158<i>pT</i>. At each string breaking the quark and antiquark of the pair are
159supposed to receive opposite and compensating <i>pT</i> kicks according
160to a Gaussian distribution in <i>p_x</i> and <i>p_y</i> separately.
161Call <i>sigma_q</i> the width of the <i>p_x</i> and <i>p_y</i>
162distributions separately, i.e.
163<br/><i>
164    d(Prob) = exp( -(p_x^2 + p_y^2) / 2 sigma_q^2).
165</i><br/>
166Then the total squared width is
167<br/><i>
168    &lt;pT^2> = &lt;p_x^2> +  &lt;p_y^2> = 2 sigma_q^2 = sigma^2.
169</i><br/>
170It is this latter number that is stored in
171
172<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringPT:sigma </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="13" value="0.304" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>0.304</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.0</code>; <code>maximum = 1.0</code>)</td></tr></table>
173the width <i>sigma</i> in the fragmentation process.
174 
175
176<p/>
177Since a normal hadron receives <i>pT</i> contributions for two string
178breakings, it has a <i>&lt;p_x^2>_had = &lt;p_y^2>_had = sigma^2</i>,
179and thus <i>&lt;pT^2>_had = 2 sigma^2</i>. 
180
181<p/>
182Some studies on isolated particles at LEP has indicated the need for
183a slightly enhanced rate in the high-<i>pT</i> tail of the above
184distribution. This would have to be reviewed in the context of a
185complete retune of parton showers and hadronization, but for the
186moment we stay with the current recipe, to boost the above <i>pT</i>
187by a factor <i>enhancedWidth</i> for a small fraction
188<i>enhancedFraction</i> of the breakups, where
189
190<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringPT:enhancedFraction </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="14" value="0.01" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>0.01</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.0</code>; <code>maximum = 1.</code>)</td></tr></table>
191<i>enhancedFraction</i>,the fraction of string breaks with enhanced
192width.
193 
194
195<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringPT:enhancedWidth </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="15" value="2.0" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>2.0</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 1.0</code>; <code>maximum = 10.0</code>)</td></tr></table>
196<i>enhancedWidth</i>,the enhancement of the width in this fraction.
197 
198
199<h3>Jet joining procedure</h3>
200
201String fragmentation is carried out iteratively from both string ends
202inwards, which means that the two chains of hadrons have to be joined up
203somewhere in the middle of the event. This joining is described by
204parameters that in principle follows from the standard fragmentation
205parameters, but in a way too complicated to parametrize. The dependence
206is rather mild, however, so for a sensible range of variation the
207parameters in this section should not be touched.
208
209<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringFragmentation:stopMass </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="16" value="1.0" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>1.0</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.0</code>; <code>maximum = 2.0</code>)</td></tr></table>
210Is used to define a <i>W_min = m_q1 + m_q2 + stopMass</i>,
211where <i>m_q1</i> and <i>m_q2</i> are the masses of the two
212current endpoint quarks or diquarks.
213 
214
215<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringFragmentation:stopNewFlav </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="17" value="2.0" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>2.0</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.0</code>; <code>maximum = 2.0</code>)</td></tr></table>
216Add to <i>W_min</i> an amount <i>stopNewFlav * m_q_last</i>,
217where <i>q_last</i> is the last <i>q qbar</i> pair produced
218between the final two hadrons.
219 
220
221<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringFragmentation:stopSmear </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="18" value="0.2" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>0.2</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.0</code>; <code>maximum = 0.5</code>)</td></tr></table>
222The <i>W_min</i> above is then smeared uniformly in the range
223<i>W_min_smeared = W_min * [ 1 - stopSmear, 1 + stopSmear ]</i>.
224 
225
226<p/>
227This <i>W_min_smeared</i> is then compared with the current remaining
228<i>W_transverse</i> to determine if there is energy left for further
229particle production. If not, i.e. if
230<i>W_transverse &lt; W_min_smeared</i>, the final two particles are
231produced from what is currently left, if possible. (If not, the
232fragmentation process is started over.)
233
234<h3>Simplifying systems</h3>
235
236There are a few situations when it is meaningful to simplify the
237original task, one way or another.
238
239<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>HadronLevel:mStringMin </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="19" value="1." size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>1.</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.5</code>; <code>maximum = 1.5</code>)</td></tr></table>
240Decides whether a partonic system should be considered as a normal
241string or a ministring, the latter only producing one or two primary
242hadrons. The system mass should be above <i>mStringMin</i> plus the
243sum of quark/diquark constituent masses for a normal string description,
244else the ministring scenario is used.
245 
246
247<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>FragmentationSystems:mJoin </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="20" value="0.3" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>0.3</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.2</code>; <code>maximum = 1.</code>)</td></tr></table>
248When two colour-connected partons are very nearby, with at least
249one being a gluon, they can be joined into one, to avoid technical
250problems of very small string regions. The requirement for joining is
251that the invariant mass of the pair is below <i>mJoin</i>, where a
252gluon only counts with half its momentum, i.e. with its contribution
253to the string region under consideration. (Note that, for technical
254reasons, the 0.2 GeV lower limit is de facto hardcoded.)
255 
256
257<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>FragmentationSystems:mJoinJunction </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="21" value="1.0" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>1.0</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.5</code>; <code>maximum = 2.</code>)</td></tr></table>
258When the invariant mass of two of the quarks in a three-quark junction
259string system becomes too small, the system is simplified to a
260quark-diquark simple string. The requirement for this simplification
261is that the diquark mass, minus the two quark masses, falls below
262<i>mJoinJunction</i>. Gluons on the string between the junction and
263the respective quark, if any, are counted as part of the quark
264four-momentum. Those on the two combined legs are clustered with the
265diquark when it is formed.
266 
267
268<h3>Ministrings</h3>
269
270The <code>MiniStringFragmentation</code> machinery is only used when a
271string system has so small invariant mass that normal string fragmentation
272is difficult/impossible. Instead one or two particles are produced,
273in the former case shuffling energy-momentum relative to another
274colour singlet system in the event, while preserving the invariant
275mass of that system. With one exception parameters are the same as
276defined for normal string fragmentation, to the extent that they are
277at all applicable in this case.
278
279A discussion of the relevant physics is found in [<a href="Bibliography.php" target="page">Nor00</a>].
280The current implementation does not completely abide to the scheme
281presented there, however, but has in part been simplified. (In part
282for greater clarity, in part since the class is not quite finished yet.)
283
284<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>MiniStringFragmentation:nTry </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="22" value="2" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>2</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 1</code>; <code>maximum = 10</code>)</td></tr></table>
285Whenever the machinery is called, first this many attempts are made
286to pick two hadrons that the system fragments to. If the hadrons are
287too massive the attempt will fail, but a new subsequent try could
288involve other flavour and hadrons and thus still succeed.
289After <i>nTry</i> attempts, instead an attempt is made to produce a
290single hadron from the system. Should also this fail, some further
291attempts at obtaining two hadrons will be made before eventually
292giving up.
293 
294
295<h3>Junction treatment</h3>
296
297A junction topology corresponds to an Y arrangement of strings
298i.e. where three string pieces have to be joined up in a junction.
299Such topologies can arise if several valence quarks are kicked out
300from a proton beam, or in baryon-number-violating SUSY decays.
301Special attention is necessary to handle the region just around
302the junction, where the baryon number topologically is located.
303The junction fragmentation scheme is described in [<a href="Bibliography.php" target="page">Sjo03</a>].
304The parameters in this section should not be touched except by experts.
305
306<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringFragmentation:eNormJunction </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="23" value="2.0" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>2.0</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.5</code>; <code>maximum = 10</code>)</td></tr></table>
307Used to find the effective rest frame of the junction, which is
308complicated when the three string legs may contain additional
309gluons between the junction and the endpoint. To this end,
310a pull is defined as a weighed sum of the momenta on each leg,
311where the weight is <i>exp(- eSum / eNormJunction)</i>, with
312<i>eSum</i> the summed energy of all partons closer to the junction
313than the currently considered one (in the junction rest frame).
314Should in principle be (close to) <i>sqrt((1 + a) / b)</i>, with
315<i>a</i> and <i>b</i> the parameters of the Lund symmetric
316fragmentation function.
317 
318
319<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringFragmentation:eBothLeftJunction </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="24" value="1.0" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>1.0</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.5</code>)</td></tr></table>
320Retry (up to 10 times) when the first two considered strings in to a
321junction both have a remaining energy (in the junction rest frame)
322above this number.
323 
324
325<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringFragmentation:eMaxLeftJunction </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="25" value="10.0" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>10.0</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.</code>)</td></tr></table>
326Retry (up to 10 times) when the first two considered strings in to a
327junction has a highest remaining energy (in the junction rest frame)
328above a random energy evenly distributed between
329<i>eBothLeftJunction</i> and
330<i>eBothLeftJunction + eMaxLeftJunction</i> 
331(drawn anew for each test).
332 
333
334<br/><br/><table><tr><td><strong>StringFragmentation:eMinLeftJunction </td><td></td><td> <input type="text" name="26" value="0.2" size="20"/>  &nbsp;&nbsp;(<code>default = <strong>0.2</strong></code>; <code>minimum = 0.</code>)</td></tr></table>
335Retry (up to 10 times) when the invariant mass-squared of the final leg
336and the leftover momentum of the first two treated legs falls below
337<i>eMinLeftJunction</i> times the energy of the final leg (in the
338junction rest frame).
339 
340
341<input type="hidden" name="saved" value="1"/>
342
343<?php
344echo "<input type='hidden' name='filepath' value='".$_GET["filepath"]."'/>"?>
345
346<table width="100%"><tr><td align="right"><input type="submit" value="Save Settings" /></td></tr></table>
347</form>
348
349<?php
350
351if($_POST["saved"] == 1)
352{
353$filepath = $_POST["filepath"];
354$handle = fopen($filepath, 'a');
355
356if($_POST["1"] != "0.3")
357{
358$data = "StringZ:aLund = ".$_POST["1"]."\n";
359fwrite($handle,$data);
360}
361if($_POST["2"] != "0.8")
362{
363$data = "StringZ:bLund = ".$_POST["2"]."\n";
364fwrite($handle,$data);
365}
366if($_POST["3"] != "0.5")
367{
368$data = "StringZ:aExtraDiquark = ".$_POST["3"]."\n";
369fwrite($handle,$data);
370}
371if($_POST["4"] != "1.0")
372{
373$data = "StringZ:rFactC = ".$_POST["4"]."\n";
374fwrite($handle,$data);
375}
376if($_POST["5"] != "0.67")
377{
378$data = "StringZ:rFactB = ".$_POST["5"]."\n";
379fwrite($handle,$data);
380}
381if($_POST["6"] != "1.0")
382{
383$data = "StringZ:rFactH = ".$_POST["6"]."\n";
384fwrite($handle,$data);
385}
386if($_POST["7"] != "off")
387{
388$data = "StringZ:usePetersonC = ".$_POST["7"]."\n";
389fwrite($handle,$data);
390}
391if($_POST["8"] != "off")
392{
393$data = "StringZ:usePetersonB = ".$_POST["8"]."\n";
394fwrite($handle,$data);
395}
396if($_POST["9"] != "off")
397{
398$data = "StringZ:usePetersonH = ".$_POST["9"]."\n";
399fwrite($handle,$data);
400}
401if($_POST["10"] != "0.05")
402{
403$data = "StringZ:epsilonC = ".$_POST["10"]."\n";
404fwrite($handle,$data);
405}
406if($_POST["11"] != "0.005")
407{
408$data = "StringZ:epsilonB = ".$_POST["11"]."\n";
409fwrite($handle,$data);
410}
411if($_POST["12"] != "0.005")
412{
413$data = "StringZ:epsilonH = ".$_POST["12"]."\n";
414fwrite($handle,$data);
415}
416if($_POST["13"] != "0.304")
417{
418$data = "StringPT:sigma = ".$_POST["13"]."\n";
419fwrite($handle,$data);
420}
421if($_POST["14"] != "0.01")
422{
423$data = "StringPT:enhancedFraction = ".$_POST["14"]."\n";
424fwrite($handle,$data);
425}
426if($_POST["15"] != "2.0")
427{
428$data = "StringPT:enhancedWidth = ".$_POST["15"]."\n";
429fwrite($handle,$data);
430}
431if($_POST["16"] != "1.0")
432{
433$data = "StringFragmentation:stopMass = ".$_POST["16"]."\n";
434fwrite($handle,$data);
435}
436if($_POST["17"] != "2.0")
437{
438$data = "StringFragmentation:stopNewFlav = ".$_POST["17"]."\n";
439fwrite($handle,$data);
440}
441if($_POST["18"] != "0.2")
442{
443$data = "StringFragmentation:stopSmear = ".$_POST["18"]."\n";
444fwrite($handle,$data);
445}
446if($_POST["19"] != "1.")
447{
448$data = "HadronLevel:mStringMin = ".$_POST["19"]."\n";
449fwrite($handle,$data);
450}
451if($_POST["20"] != "0.3")
452{
453$data = "FragmentationSystems:mJoin = ".$_POST["20"]."\n";
454fwrite($handle,$data);
455}
456if($_POST["21"] != "1.0")
457{
458$data = "FragmentationSystems:mJoinJunction = ".$_POST["21"]."\n";
459fwrite($handle,$data);
460}
461if($_POST["22"] != "2")
462{
463$data = "MiniStringFragmentation:nTry = ".$_POST["22"]."\n";
464fwrite($handle,$data);
465}
466if($_POST["23"] != "2.0")
467{
468$data = "StringFragmentation:eNormJunction = ".$_POST["23"]."\n";
469fwrite($handle,$data);
470}
471if($_POST["24"] != "1.0")
472{
473$data = "StringFragmentation:eBothLeftJunction = ".$_POST["24"]."\n";
474fwrite($handle,$data);
475}
476if($_POST["25"] != "10.0")
477{
478$data = "StringFragmentation:eMaxLeftJunction = ".$_POST["25"]."\n";
479fwrite($handle,$data);
480}
481if($_POST["26"] != "0.2")
482{
483$data = "StringFragmentation:eMinLeftJunction = ".$_POST["26"]."\n";
484fwrite($handle,$data);
485}
486fclose($handle);
487}
488
489?>
490</body>
491</html>
492
493<!-- Copyright (C) 2012 Torbjorn Sjostrand -->
494
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.