| [388] | 1 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | 
|---|
|  | 2 | \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article} | 
|---|
|  | 3 |  | 
|---|
|  | 4 | %-- used packages ------------------------------------------------------ | 
|---|
|  | 5 |  | 
|---|
|  | 6 | %%%JEC 3/2/06 does not compile at LAL \usepackage{cite} | 
|---|
|  | 7 | %\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} | 
|---|
|  | 8 | %\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} | 
|---|
|  | 9 | \usepackage{graphicx} | 
|---|
|  | 10 | \usepackage{epsfig} | 
|---|
|  | 11 | \usepackage{amssymb} | 
|---|
|  | 12 | \usepackage{amsmath} | 
|---|
|  | 13 | \usepackage{latexsym} | 
|---|
|  | 14 |  | 
|---|
|  | 15 | \setlength{\textheight}{23cm} | 
|---|
|  | 16 | \setlength{\textwidth}{16cm} | 
|---|
|  | 17 | \setlength{\topmargin}{0cm} | 
|---|
|  | 18 | \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0cm} | 
|---|
|  | 19 | \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0cm} | 
|---|
|  | 20 | \setlength{\marginparwidth}{0pt} | 
|---|
|  | 21 |  | 
|---|
|  | 22 | \def\beq{\begin{equation}} | 
|---|
|  | 23 | \def\eeq{\end{equation}} | 
|---|
|  | 24 | \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}} | 
|---|
|  | 25 | \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}} | 
|---|
|  | 26 |  | 
|---|
|  | 27 |  | 
|---|
|  | 28 |  | 
|---|
|  | 29 | \begin{document} | 
|---|
|  | 30 |  | 
|---|
|  | 31 | \title{Dark Current induced trigger in MEMPHYS\thanks{Preliminary}} | 
|---|
|  | 32 | \author{J.E Campagne - LAL - Orsay} | 
|---|
|  | 33 | \date{\today} | 
|---|
|  | 34 | \maketitle | 
|---|
|  | 35 |  | 
|---|
|  | 36 | \begin{abstract} | 
|---|
|  | 37 | Blabla | 
|---|
|  | 38 | \end{abstract} | 
|---|
|  | 39 |  | 
|---|
|  | 40 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | 
|---|
|  | 41 | \section{Motivations} | 
|---|
|  | 42 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | 
|---|
|  | 43 | On 5th of July, J.~Bouchez had demonstrated the need to investigate deeper than expected the dark current induced trigger for a MEMPHYS tank. As a matter of fact, a 3~MeV reactor neutrino produce around 15~p.e, so basically 15 PMTs on a Cerenkov cone are hit, while in the same time at 2~kHz dark current noise per PMT in a 400~ns time window one can expect around 160 PMT hit randomly distributed. Although, it may be not a problem (not yet proved) to recover the PMTs of the signal, the main concern is the trigger.  J.~Bouchez has made a preliminary numerical analysis to show that the question is relevant. | 
|---|
|  | 44 | A long this line, I have investigated a toy MC and analytical analysis. | 
|---|
|  | 45 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | 
|---|
|  | 46 | \section{A toy MC} | 
|---|
|  | 47 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | 
|---|
|  | 48 | The toy MC consists simply of the generation of dark current random noise on each PMT baseline, then it simulates a digital sum of all the PMT baselines, and applies a threshold on a total number of PMT hit during a sliding window. This toy MC can be adapted according to: | 
|---|
|  | 49 | \begin{verbatim} | 
|---|
|  | 50 | NumberOfPMT  = 81,000 for MEMPHYS | 
|---|
|  | 51 | DarkCurrentRate = 6.0*kHz  more likely for 12" | 
|---|
|  | 52 | TriggerSlidingGate = 425.0*ns for MEMPHYS | 
|---|
|  | 53 | PulseWidth = 5.0*ns this is the time quantum (a pulse width equivalent) | 
|---|
|  | 54 | TimeDurationOfExp = 6000.0*micros (+TriggerSlidingGate) | 
|---|
|  | 55 | as a total time for investigation | 
|---|
|  | 56 | CountThreshold = number of PMTs at least to be fired in a TriggerSlidingGate to | 
|---|
|  | 57 | produce a Trigger | 
|---|
|  | 58 | \end{verbatim} | 
|---|
|  | 59 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | 
|---|
|  | 60 | \subsection{Dark current generation} | 
|---|
|  | 61 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | 
|---|
|  | 62 | According to the fact that dark current is a random noise, if ones make the assumption that there is no correlation between two noise hit (at least on the scale of \verb|TriggerSlidingGate|), then the time interval between two hit $\delta t$ follow an exponential probability with parameter $\tau = 1/\verb|DarkCurrentRate|$. So, the probability to get 1 hit in the time window $[t_0,t_0+\Delta t]$ reads: | 
|---|
|  | 63 | \bea | 
|---|
|  | 64 | P(1;[t_0,t_0+\Delta t]) & = & \int_{t_0}^{t_0+\Delta t} e^{(t-t_0)/\tau} \frac{dt}{\tau} \nonumber \\ | 
|---|
|  | 65 | & = & 1 - e^{-\Delta t/\tau} = \frac{\Delta t}{\tau} - \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{\Delta t}{\tau}\right)^2 \dots | 
|---|
|  | 66 | \label{eq:singleProba} | 
|---|
|  | 67 | \eea | 
|---|
|  | 68 | and is independent of $t_0$. | 
|---|
|  | 69 |  | 
|---|
|  | 70 | If one piles up $N$ PMTs and if $\Delta t/\tau \rightarrow 0$, then it is well known that the probability to get $n$ PMTs hit in a time window of $\Delta t$ tends to a Poisson distribution: | 
|---|
|  | 71 | \beq | 
|---|
|  | 72 | P(n|N;[t,t+\Delta t]) \stackrel{\Delta t/\tau \rightarrow 0}{\longrightarrow}\mathrm{Poisson}(n;N\Delta t/\tau) | 
|---|
|  | 73 | \label{eq:poissonLimit} | 
|---|
|  | 74 | \eeq | 
|---|
|  | 75 | One can see these properties reproduced by the toy MC on Fig.~\ref{fig:PMTPoisson} for some parameters values used on purpose. | 
|---|
|  | 76 | \begin{figure}[htb] | 
|---|
|  | 77 | \begin{minipage}[c]{0.44\textwidth} | 
|---|
|  | 78 | \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{deltaT.eps} | 
|---|
|  | 79 | \end{minipage} | 
|---|
|  | 80 | \begin{minipage}[c]{0.05\textwidth} | 
|---|
|  | 81 | \end{minipage} | 
|---|
|  | 82 | \begin{minipage}[c]{0.44\textwidth} | 
|---|
|  | 83 | \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{NumberPMTs.eps} | 
|---|
|  | 84 | \end{minipage} | 
|---|
|  | 85 | \caption{\label{fig:PMTPoisson} {\it left panel}: exponential generation of $\delta t$ with $1/\tau = 1$~MHz dark current noise; {\it right panel}: number of PMTs fired among 50 PMTs, per $\Delta t = 100$~ns windows. One expects a Poisson distribution with a mean of $N\Delta t/\tau = 5$ as it is shown. | 
|---|
|  | 86 | } | 
|---|
|  | 87 | \end{figure} | 
|---|
|  | 88 |  | 
|---|
|  | 89 | In fact, as it is mentioned, the Poisson distribution is an asymptotic distribution. The real probability to get exactly $n$ PMTs fired among a collection of $N$ PMTs in a $\Delta t$ time window, with the hypothesis that each PMT  dark current rate has a $1/\tau$ frequency, reads (using Eq.~\ref{eq:singleProba}): | 
|---|
|  | 90 | \bea | 
|---|
|  | 91 | P(n|N;[t,t+\Delta t]) & = & C_N^n P(1;[t,t+\Delta t])^n \left(1-P(1;[t,t+\Delta t])\right)^{N-n} \nonumber \\ | 
|---|
|  | 92 | & = &\mathrm{Binomial}(n,N;P(1,[t,t+\Delta t])) | 
|---|
|  | 93 | \label{eq:BinomialProb} | 
|---|
|  | 94 | \eea | 
|---|
|  | 95 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | 
|---|
|  | 96 | \subsection{Trigger simulation} | 
|---|
|  | 97 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | 
|---|
|  | 98 | One may wish to know the occurrence of "how many times per second, $n_{Th}$ PMTs are fired among $N$ PMTs?". In fact, J.~Bouchez noticed that this question is not complete as one may trigger only if the number of PMTs fired in a $\Delta t$ sliding windows just exceeds $n_{Th}$. That is to say, one should consider the stepping function of the number of PMTs  fired in the sliding window $\Delta t$ examined at $t$, noted $n(t)$, and consider as "trigger" the passage $n(t)=n_{Th} \rightarrow n(t+dt)=n_{Th}+1$ in an infinitesimal time duration $dt$. In fact, looking at Fig.~\ref{fig:DigitalSum}, where is displayed the digital sum of $N=81,000$ PMts with 6~kHz dark current noise rate in sliding window of $425$~ns (computed every $dt=5$~ns), one notices that it is true that the threshold\footnote{mean number of PMTS is 206 and the threshold is set 3 sigma above} at $250$  is reached by steps, but one may also specify that if there is a trigger at $t_1$, before to re-trigger the $n(t>t_1)$ function may pass through a sequence $n(t)=n_{Th}+1 \rightarrow n(t+dt)=n_{Th}$. | 
|---|
|  | 99 | \begin{figure}[htb] | 
|---|
|  | 100 | \begin{minipage}[c]{0.44\textwidth} | 
|---|
|  | 101 | \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{SumBaseline.eps} | 
|---|
|  | 102 | \end{minipage} | 
|---|
|  | 103 | \begin{minipage}[c]{0.05\textwidth} | 
|---|
|  | 104 | \end{minipage} | 
|---|
|  | 105 | \begin{minipage}[c]{0.44\textwidth} | 
|---|
|  | 106 | \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{SumBaselineZoom.eps} | 
|---|
|  | 107 | \end{minipage} | 
|---|
|  | 108 | \caption{\label{fig:DigitalSum} {\it left panel}: Digital sum of the time evolution of $N=81,000$ PMTs with a dark current of $6$~kHz, computed for a time sliding window of $425$~ns every $5$~ns; {\it right panel}: zoom around the location of a trigger threshold at $250$ PMTs. | 
|---|
|  | 109 | } | 
|---|
|  | 110 | \end{figure} | 
|---|
|  | 111 |  | 
|---|
|  | 112 | So in practice, one considers as  a trigger the passage $n(t)=n_{Th} \rightarrow n(t+dt)=n_{Th}+1$ and groups together the following $n(t)$ values contiguous in time for which $n(t)>=n_{Th}$. Using this definition, one gets the results for one MEMPHYS tank (Tab.\ref{tab:TriggerRate}): $N=81,000$ PMTs, a sliding window of $425$~ns which corresponds to the maximum time of flight of \v{C}erenkov light in the $\phi: 65~\mathrm{m} \times H:65~\mathrm{m}$ cylinder water volume ($v = 22,6~\mathrm{cm/ns}$). | 
|---|
|  | 113 | \begin{table} | 
|---|
|  | 114 | \begin{center} | 
|---|
|  | 115 | \begin{tabular}{cccc}\hline\hline | 
|---|
|  | 116 | DC per PMT (kHz) & Mean of PMTs fired & Threshold (at 3$\sigma$)  & Trigger (kHz) & Th (kHz)\\ | 
|---|
|  | 117 | 1                 &      34           &  52                     & 412             & 57\\ | 
|---|
|  | 118 | 2                 &      69           &  93                     & 378              & 64.9\\ | 
|---|
|  | 119 | 3                 &      103           &  133                     & 198            & 2.8 10^3\\ | 
|---|
|  | 120 | 4                 &      138           &  172                     & 378            & 7.1\\ | 
|---|
|  | 121 | 5                 &      172           &  211                     & 268            & 3.1\\ | 
|---|
|  | 122 | 6                 &      206          &  249                     & 416             & 1.5\\ \hline | 
|---|
|  | 123 | DC per PMT (kHz) & Mean of PMTs fired & Threshold  & Trigger \& rel. err (kHz) \\ | 
|---|
|  | 124 | 1                 &      34           & 40 (1$\sigma$)                 &   30 811 (0.7\%) & 1475.5 \\ | 
|---|
|  | 125 | 1                 &      34           & 46 (2$\sigma$)                 &    4580 (2\%)    & 363.4\\ | 
|---|
|  | 126 | 1                 &      34           & 52 (3$\sigma$)                 &     412 (7\%)     & 41.2   \\ | 
|---|
|  | 127 | 1                 &      34           & 57 (4$\sigma$)                 &      28 (12\%)    & 3.9\\ | 
|---|
|  | 128 | \hline\hline | 
|---|
|  | 129 | \end{tabular} | 
|---|
|  | 130 | \caption{\label{tab:TriggerRate} Mean number of PMTs ($m$)fired among $N=81,000$ PMTs on a time sliding window of $\Delta t=425$~ns corresponding to the dark current (DC) rate ($f$) per PMT (this is $N\Delta t * f$). Then, setting a threshold to $m+3\sqrt m$, one reads the trigger rate (see text for the definition of a trigger). The relative errors is also reported as it is not negligeable.} | 
|---|
|  | 131 | \end{center} | 
|---|
|  | 132 | \end{table} | 
|---|
|  | 133 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | 
|---|
|  | 134 | \subsection{Analytical formula} | 
|---|
|  | 135 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | 
|---|
|  | 136 |  | 
|---|
|  | 137 |  | 
|---|
|  | 138 | \end{document} | 
|---|