[385] | 1 | % -------------------------- |
---|
| 2 | \subsection{SPL SuperBeam} |
---|
| 3 | % -------------------------- |
---|
| 4 | %In the CERN-SPL SuperBeam project \cite{SPL,SPL-Physics,nufact1} |
---|
| 5 | % the planned 4MW SPL (Superconducting Proton Linac) would deliver a 2.2 GeV/c |
---|
| 6 | % proton beam, on a Hg target to generate |
---|
| 7 | % an intense $\pi^+$ ($\pi^-$) beam focused by a suitable |
---|
| 8 | % magnetic horn in a short decay tunnel. As a result an intense |
---|
| 9 | % $\nu_{\mu}$ beam, will be produced |
---|
| 10 | % mainly via the $\pi$-decay, $\pi^+ \rightarrow \nu_{\mu} \; \mu^+$ providing a |
---|
| 11 | % flux $\phi \sim 3.6 {\cdot} 10^{11} \nu_{\mu}$/year/m$^2$ at 130 Km |
---|
| 12 | % of distance, and an average energy of 0.27 GeV. |
---|
| 13 | % The $\nu_e$ contamination from $K$ will be suppressed by threshold effects |
---|
| 14 | % and the resulting $\nu_e/\nu_{\mu}$ ratio ($ \sim 0.4 \%$) |
---|
| 15 | % will be known within $2\%$ error. |
---|
| 16 | % The use of a near and far detector (the latter at $L = 130$ Km of distance |
---|
| 17 | % in the Frejus area \cite{Mosca}) |
---|
| 18 | % will allow for both $\nu_{\mu}$-disappearance and |
---|
| 19 | % $\nu_{\mu} \rightarrow \nu_e$ appearance studies. |
---|
| 20 | % The physics potential of the 2.2 GeV SPL SuperBeam (SPL-SB) |
---|
| 21 | % with a water Cerenkov far detector fiducial mass of 440 Kt \cite{UNO} has been extensively |
---|
| 22 | % studied \cite{SPL-Physics}. \\ |
---|
| 23 | % |
---|
| 24 | % New developments show that the potential of the SPL-SB potential could be |
---|
| 25 | % improved by rising the SPL energy to 3.5 GeV \cite{Cazes}, |
---|
| 26 | % to produce more copious secondary mesons |
---|
| 27 | % and to focus them more efficiently. This seems feasible if |
---|
| 28 | % status of the art RF cavities would be used in place of the old foreseen LEP cavities |
---|
| 29 | % \cite{Garoby-SPL}. |
---|
| 30 | % In this upgraded configuration neutrino flux could be increased by a factor 3 with |
---|
| 31 | % with respect to the 2.2 GeV configuration, reaching |
---|
| 32 | % a sensitivity to $\sin^2{2 \thetaot}$ 8 times better than T2K and allowing |
---|
| 33 | % to discovery CP violation (at 3 $\sigma$ level) if |
---|
| 34 | % $\delCP \geq 25^\circ$ and |
---|
| 35 | % $\theta_{13} \geq 1.4^\circ$ \cite{MMNufact04}. The expected |
---|
| 36 | % performances are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:th13}. |
---|
| 37 | % |
---|
| 38 | % \begin{figure} |
---|
| 39 | % \centerline{\epsfig{file=show_fluxes_new.eps,width=0.5\textwidth}} |
---|
| 40 | % \mycaption{Neutrino flux of $\beta$-Beam ($\gamma=100$) |
---|
| 41 | % and CERN-SPL SuperBeam, 3.5 GeV, at 130 Km of distance.} |
---|
| 42 | % \label{fig:fluxes} |
---|
| 43 | % \end{figure} |
---|
| 44 | |
---|
| 45 | An optimization of the energy as well as the secondary particle focusing and decay tunnel has been undertaken in the context of a Super Beam of 4~MW \cite{JECACLAL} using the CERN-SPL \cite{SPL} and searching for $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_e$ ($\bar{\nu}_\mu \rightarrow \bar{\nu}_e$) appearance channels in an 500~kT fiducial volume water Cerenkov detector, called MEMPHYS, and located in an possible new underground laboratory at the Fréjus tunnel, 130~km from the CERN complex. The use of a near detector will also enable the use of the disappearance channels. |
---|
| 46 | |
---|
| 47 | The secondary particles from the interaction of proton beam impinging a 30~cm long 1.5~cm diameter mercury target, have been obtained with the FLUKA generator (see Tab.~\ref{tab:nbPart}). At kinetic energy of 3.5 (2.2)~GeV, the number of p.o.t per year is 0.69 (1.10) $10^{23}$ while the numbers of $\pi^+/\pi^-/K^+/K^o$ per p.o.t are $0.41/0.37/35 10^{-4}/30 10^{-4}$ ($0.24/0.18/7 10^{-4}/6 10^{-4}$). At higher beam energy, the kaon rates grow rapidly compared to the pion rates, and needless to emphasize the need of an experimental confirmation \cite{HARP,MINERVA} of such numbers. |
---|
| 48 | |
---|
| 49 | The focusing system (magnetic horns) optimized in the context of a Neutrino Factory \cite{SIMONE1,DONEGA} has been redesigned considering the specific requirements of a Super Beam. The most important points are the phase spaces that are covered by the two types of horns are different, and that for a Super Beam the pions to be focused should have an energy of the order of $p_\pi (\mathrm{MeV})/3 \approx E_\nu \gtrsim 2L(\mathrm{km})$ to obtain a maximum oscillation probability. In practice, this means that one should collect $800$~MeV/c pions to get a mean neutrino energy of $300$~MeV. |
---|
| 50 | |
---|
| 51 | \begin{table} |
---|
| 52 | \centering |
---|
| 53 | \caption{\label{tab:nbPart}Average numbers of the most relevant secondary particles exiting the $30$~cm long, $1.5$~cm diameter mercury target per incident proton (FLUKA).} |
---|
| 54 | \begin{tabular}{@{}l*{15}{l}} |
---|
| 55 | \hline\noalign{\smallskip} |
---|
| 56 | $E_k$ (GeV) & p.o.t/y & $\pi^+$ & $\pi^-$ & $K^+$ & $K^0$ \\ |
---|
| 57 | & $\times 10^{23}$ & & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\times 10^{-4}$} \\ |
---|
| 58 | \noalign{\smallskip}\hline\noalign{\smallskip} |
---|
| 59 | $2.2$ & $1.10$ & $0.24$ & $0.18$ & $7$ & $6$ \\ |
---|
| 60 | $3.5$ & $0.69$ & $0.41$ & $0.37$ & $35$ & $30$ \\ |
---|
| 61 | $4.5$ & $0.54$ & $0.57$ & $0.39$ & $93$ & $68$ \\ |
---|
| 62 | $8.0$ & $0.30$ & $1.00$ & $0.85$ & $413$ & $340$ \\ |
---|
| 63 | \noalign{\smallskip}\hline |
---|
| 64 | \end{tabular} |
---|
| 65 | \end{table} |
---|
| 66 | |
---|
| 67 | The resulting fluxes for the positive ($\nu_\mu$ beam) and the negative focusing ($\bar{\nu}_\mu$ beam) are show on figure \ref{fig:fluxComparison}. The total number of $\nu_\mu$ ($\bar{\nu}_\mu$) in positive (negative) focusing is about $1.18 (0.97) 10^{12}/\mathrm{m}^2/\mathrm{yr}$ with an average energy of $300$~MeV. The $\nu_e$ ($\bar{\nu}_\mu$) contamination in the $\nu_\mu$ beam is around $0.7\%$ ($6.0\%$) |
---|
| 68 | and will be known within $2\%$ error. Compared to the fluxes used in references \cite{MEZZETTONF02,DONINI04} the gain is at least a factor $2.5$. Using neutrino cross-sections on water \cite{LIPARIxsec}, the number of expected $\nu_\mu$ charged current is about $95$ per kT.yr. |
---|
| 69 | % |
---|
| 70 | \begin{figure} |
---|
| 71 | \centering |
---|
| 72 | \includegraphics[height=60mm]{OptiVsOldFlux.eps} |
---|
| 73 | \caption{\label{fig:fluxComparison}The $\nu_\mu$ and the $\bar{\nu}_\mu$ fluxes obtained by optimizing the SPL for a Super Beam case ("SB Opt.") are compared to those obtained with a focusing system designed for a Neutrino Factory ("NF Opt.").} |
---|
| 74 | \end{figure} |
---|
| 75 | |
---|
| 76 | The physics potential of the new optimized SPL may be determined using GLoBES software \cite{GLOBES}. Both the appearance and the disappearance channels have been used, and also five bins of 200~MeV each have been introduced. The $\pi^o$ background have been rejected using a tighter PID cut compared to standard SuperK analysis \cite{MEZZETTONF02}. The Michel electron has been required for the $\mu$ identification. As ultimate goal suggested by \cite{T2K} a 2\% systematical error is used both for signal and background. |
---|
| 77 | |
---|
| 78 | The $90\%$ CL sensitivity contour in the ($\Delta m^2_{31}$,$\sin^22\theta_{13}$) plane after 5 years running with a positive focusing is shown on figure \ref{fig:SPLDmTheta13Comparison}. With the new optimized setup, one expects to reach a limit on $\theta_{13}$ of $0.7^o$. |
---|
| 79 | % |
---|
| 80 | \begin{figure} |
---|
| 81 | \centering |
---|
| 82 | \includegraphics[height=60mm]{compareOldNewthetaDm.eps} |
---|
| 83 | \caption{\label{fig:SPLDmTheta13Comparison}Comparison of the sensitivity contours with the new optimized setup and the original SPL design after 5 years of running with positive focusing.} |
---|
| 84 | \end{figure} |
---|
| 85 | % |
---|
| 86 | One may also appreciate on figure \ref{fig:SPLCPSensi} the improvement on the combined sensitivity of $\sin^22\theta_{13}$ and $\delta_{CP}$ with the new optimization compared for instance to the T2K project \cite{T2K}. |
---|
| 87 | % |
---|
| 88 | \begin{figure} |
---|
| 89 | \centering |
---|
| 90 | \includegraphics[height=60mm]{deltaThetaSens5yOldNew.eps} |
---|
| 91 | \caption{\label{fig:SPLCPSensi}Comparison of the sensitivity on combined $\theta_{13}$ and $\delta_{CP}$ after 5 years of positive focusing. The T2K sensitivity contour has been derived from reference \cite{T2K}. No mass hierarchy nor octant hierarchy ambiguity has been considered.} |
---|
| 92 | \end{figure} |
---|
| 93 | % |
---|
| 94 | |
---|
| 95 | So, the optimized SPL beam line operating a Super Beam towards a megaton scale detector (called MEMPHYS) at the Fréjus tunnel has a great potential. |
---|
| 96 | |
---|
| 97 | |
---|
| 98 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% SPL Bibliography %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
| 99 | |
---|
| 100 | \bibitem{JECACLAL} |
---|
| 101 | J.E Campagne and A. Cazes, LAL-04-102, arXiv:hep-ex/405002 submitted to \EJP |
---|
| 102 | |
---|
| 103 | \bibitem{SPL} |
---|
| 104 | SPL Conceptual Design, CERN 2000-012 |
---|
| 105 | |
---|
| 106 | \bibitem{HARP} |
---|
| 107 | C. Catanesi \etal, CERN-SPSC 2002/019 |
---|
| 108 | |
---|
| 109 | \bibitem{MINERVA} |
---|
| 110 | D. Drakoulakos \etal, Fermilab P-938, arXiv:hep-ex/405002 |
---|
| 111 | |
---|
| 112 | \bibitem{SIMONE1} |
---|
| 113 | S.~Gilardoni \etal, AIP Conf.\ Proc.\ {\bf 721} (2004) 334. |
---|
| 114 | |
---|
| 115 | \bibitem{DONEGA} |
---|
| 116 | A. Blondel \etal, CERN-NUFACT-Note-78 (2001) |
---|
| 117 | |
---|
| 118 | \bibitem{MEZZETTONF02} |
---|
| 119 | M. Mezzetto, \jpg {\bf 29}, 1781-1784 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0302005 |
---|
| 120 | |
---|
| 121 | \bibitem{DONINI04} |
---|
| 122 | A. Donini \etal, IFT-UAM/CSIC-04-30 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0406132 |
---|
| 123 | |
---|
| 124 | \bibitem{LIPARIxsec} |
---|
| 125 | P.~Lipari, M.~Lusignoli and F.~Sartogo, |
---|
| 126 | %``The Neutrino cross-section and upward going muons,'' |
---|
| 127 | \PRL {\bf 74} (1995) 4384, arXiv:hep-ph/9411341 |
---|
| 128 | |
---|
| 129 | \bibitem{GLOBES} |
---|
| 130 | P. Hubert, M. Lindner and W. Winter, arXiv:hep-ph/0407333, |
---|
| 131 | Comput.Phys.Commun. 167 (2005) 195. |
---|
| 132 | |
---|
| 133 | \bibitem{T2K} |
---|
| 134 | T. Kobayashi, \NP B 143 (Proc. Supp.) (2005) 303 |
---|
| 135 | |
---|
| 136 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
---|
| 137 | |
---|
| 138 | |
---|