source: Backup NB/Talks/MEMPHYSetal/LAGUNA/EU I3/PhysicsLatex/Laguna-before-xarchiv/Laguna.aux @ 416

\relax 
\newlabel{FirstPage}{{}{1}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\tocdepth@munge}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {}Contents}{1}{}}
\gdef \tocmax@section{27.15582pt}
\gdef \tocmax@subsection{14.34784pt}
\gdef \tocmax@subsubsection{5.0pt}
\gdef \tocmax@paragraph{5.0pt}
\gdef \tocmax@appendix{5.0pt}
\gdef \tocmax@pagenum{5.0pt}
\citation{Nath:2006ut}
\citation{Kobayashi:2005pe}
\citation{Georgi:1974sy}
\citation{Araki:2005qa}
\citation{Abdurashitov:1994bc}
\citation{Aharmim:2005gt}
\citation{Altmann:2005ix}
\citation{Anselmann:1992um}
\citation{Davis:1968cp}
\citation{Hirata:1989zj}
\citation{Smy:2002rz}
\citation{Alekseev:1988gp}
\citation{Bionta:1987qt}
\citation{Hirata:1987hu}
\citation{Aglietta:1988be}
\citation{Allison:1999ms}
\citation{Ashie:2005ik}
\citation{Becker-Szendy:1992hq}
\citation{Daum:1994bf}
\citation{Hirata:1988uy}
\citation{Hirata:1992ku}
\citation{Fukuda:1998mi}
\citation{Back:2004zn}
\citation{Araki:2004mb}
\@writefile{toc}{\tocdepth@restore}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {I}Physics Motivation}{2}{}}
\newlabel{sec:Phys-Intro}{{I}{2}{}{}{}}
\citation{Amerio:2004ze}
\citation{Arneodo:2001tx}
\citation{deBellefon:2006vq}
\citation{Marrodan:2006}
\citation{Oberauer:2005kw}
\citation{Ereditato:2004ru}
\citation{Rubbia:2004tz}
\citation{Rubbia:2004yq}
\citation{Campagne:2006yx}
\citation{Rubbia:2006pi}
\citation{Amerio:2004ze}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {II}Brief detector description}{3}{}}
\newlabel{sec:Phys-detector}{{II}{3}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  An artistic view of a 100\nobreakspace  {}kton single tanker liquid argon detector. The electronic crates are located at the top of the dewar.}}{3}{}}
\newlabel{fig:Phys-GLACIERdetector}{{1}{3}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {A}Liquid Argon TPC}{3}{}}
\citation{Beacom:2003nk}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {I}{\ignorespaces  Some basic parameters of the three detector baseline designs. The underground laboratory related matter are described in section\nobreakspace  {}III{}{}{}\hbox {}}}{4}{}}
\newlabel{tab:Phys-detector-summary}{{I}{4}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {B}Liquid Scintillator}{4}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Sketch of the LENA detector.}}{4}{}}
\newlabel{fig:Phys-LENAdetector}{{2}{4}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {C}Water \v {C}erenkov}{4}{}}
\citation{Nath:2006ut}
\citation{Dorsner:2004xa}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Sketch of the MEMPHYS detector under the Fréjus mountain (Europe).}}{5}{}}
\newlabel{fig:Phys-MEMPHYSdetector}{{3}{5}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {III}Underground sites}{5}{}}
\newlabel{sec:Phys-Sites}{{III}{5}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {IV}Proton decay sensitivity}{5}{}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {II}{\ignorespaces  Summary of relevant characteristics of some sites foreseen for the proposed detectors. The Rn content depends on the ventilation of the cavity. The "*" means that the parameter is not yet available. \color  {red}To be completed and cross-checked and unit uniformized as possible\color  {black}.}}{6}{}}
\newlabel{tab:Phys-site-parameters}{{II}{6}{}{}{}}
\citation{Georgi:1974sy}
\citation{Dorsner:2005fq}
\citation{Dorsner:2005ii}
\citation{Lee:1994vp}
\citation{Bajc:2002pg}
\citation{Bajc:2002bv}
\citation{Emmanuel-Costa:2003pu}
\citation{Murayama:2001ur}
\citation{Aulakh:2003kg}
\citation{Babu:1992ia}
\citation{Fukuyama:2004pb}
\citation{Goh:2003nv}
\citation{Friedmann:2002ty}
\citation{Dorsner:2004xa}
\citation{Dorsner:2004xa}
\citation{Bueno:2007um}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces  Isoplot for the upper bounds on the total proton lifetime in years in the Majorana neutrino case in the $M_X$--$\alpha _{GUT}$ plane. The value of the unifying coupling constant is varied from $1/60$ to $1/10$. The conventional values for $M_X$ and $\alpha _{GUT}$ in SUSY GUTs are marked in thick lines. Experimentally excluded region is given in black\nobreakspace  {}\citep  {Dorsner:2004xa}.}}{7}{}}
\newlabel{fig:Phys-PDK-Majorana}{{4}{7}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  Isoplot for the upper bounds on the total proton lifetime in years in the Dirac neutrino case in the $M_X$--$\alpha _{GUT}$ plane. The value of the unifying coupling constant is varied from $1/60$ to $1/10$. The conventional values for $M_X$ and $\alpha _{GUT}$ in SUSY GUTs are marked in thick lines. Experimentally excluded region is given in black\nobreakspace  {}\citep  {Dorsner:2004xa}.}}{7}{}}
\newlabel{fig:Phys-PDK-Dirac}{{5}{7}{}{}{}}
\citation{Agostinelli:2002hh}
\citation{Birk}
\citation{Jung:1999jq}
\citation{Jung:1999jq}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {III}{\ignorespaces Summary of some recent predictions on proton partial lifetimes. Some references for the different models are: (1) \citep  {Georgi:1974sy}, (2) \citep  {Dorsner:2005fq,Dorsner:2005ii}, (3) \citep  {Lee:1994vp}, (4) \citep  {Murayama:2001ur,Bajc:2002bv,Bajc:2002pg,Emmanuel-Costa:2003pu}, (5) \citep  {Babu:1992ia,Aulakh:2003kg,Fukuyama:2004pb,Goh:2003nv}, (6) \citep  {Friedmann:2002ty} }}{8}{}}
\newlabel{tab:Phys-PDK-Models}{{III}{8}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {A}$p \rightarrow e^+\pi ^0$}{8}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces  Sensitivity for $e^+\pi ^0$ proton decay lifetime, as determined by UNO \citep  {Jung:1999jq}. MEMPHYS corresponds to case (A).}}{8}{}}
\newlabel{fig:pdk1}{{6}{8}{}{}{}}
\citation{Nakaya:2005nk}
\citation{Undagoitia:1-2uu}
\citation{Kobayashi:2005pe}
\citation{Bueno:2007um}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces  Expected sensitivity on $\nu K^+$ proton decay as a function of MEMPHYS exposure \citep  {Jung:1999jq} (see text for details).}}{9}{}}
\newlabel{fig:pdk9_jbz}{{7}{9}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {B}$p \rightarrow \overline {\nu }K^+$}{9}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces  Expected proton decay lifetime limits ($\tau / B$ at 90\% C.L.) as a function of exposure for GLACIER. In this plot, only atmospheric neutrino background has been taken into account.}}{9}{}}
\newlabel{fig:GLACIERpdk}{{8}{9}{}{}{}}
\citation{Dighe:1999bi}
\citation{Hirata:1987hu}
\citation{Hirata:1988ad}
\citation{Aglietta:1987we}
\citation{Bionta:1987qt}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {IV}{\ignorespaces Summary of the $e^+\pi ^0$ and $\mathaccent "7016\relax {\nu }K^+$ discovery potential by the three detectors. The $e^+\pi ^0$ channel is not yet simulated in LENA.}}{10}{}}
\newlabel{tab:Phys-PDK-Summary}{{IV}{10}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {C}Comparison between the detectors}{10}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {V}Supernova neutrinos}{10}{}}
\newlabel{sec:SN}{{V}{10}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {A}SN neutrino emission and oscillations}{10}{}}
\newlabel{Conv}{{3}{10}{}{}{}}
\newlabel{eqfluxes1-3}{{4}{10}{}{}{}}
\citation{Beacom:2002hs}
\citation{Cadonati:2000kq}
\citation{Kachelriess:2004ds}
\citation{Gil-Botella:2003sz}
\citation{Gil-Botella:2004bv}
\citation{Fogli:2003dw}
\citation{Schirato:2002tg}
\citation{Fogli:2004ff}
\citation{Tomas:2004gr}
\citation{Fogli:2004ff}
\citation{Barger:2005it}
\citation{Lunardini:2001pb}
\citation{Dighe:2003jg}
\citation{Dighe:2003be}
\citation{Lunardini:2003eh}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {V}{\ignorespaces Values of the $p$ and $\mathaccent "7016\relax {p}$ parameters used in Eq.\nobreakspace  {}4{}{}{}\hbox {} in different scenario of mass hierarchy and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 \theta _{13}$.}}{11}{}}
\newlabel{tab:Phys-SN-Flux}{{V}{11}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {B}SN neutrino detection}{11}{}}
\citation{Duan:2006an}
\citation{Hannestad:2006nj}
\citation{Tomas:2003xn}
\citation{Kachelriess:2004ds}
\citation{Antonioli:2004zb}
\citation{Odrzywolek:2003vn}
\citation{Ando:2005ka}
\citation{Ando:2004sb}
\citation{Fukugita:2002qw}
\citation{Ando:2003ie}
\citation{Fogli:2004gy}
\citation{Malek:2002ns}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {VI}{\ignorespaces  Summary of the expected neutrino interaction rates in the different detectors for a $8 M_\odot $ SN located at 10\nobreakspace  {}kpc (Galactic center). The following notations have been used: I$\beta $D, $e$ES and pES stands for Inverse $\beta $ Decay, electron and proton Elastic Scattering, respectively. The final state nuclei are generally unstable and decay either radiatively (notation ${}^*$), or by $\beta ^-/\beta ^+$ weak interaction (notation ${}^{\beta ^{-,+}}$). The rates of the different reaction channels are listed, and for LENA they have been obtained by scaling the predicted rates from \citep  {Cadonati:2000kq, Beacom:2002hs}.}}{12}{}}
\newlabel{tab:Phys-SN-DetectorRates}{{VI}{12}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {C}Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background}{12}{}}
\citation{Cocco:2004ac}
\citation{Wurm:2006}
\citation{Yuksel:2005ae}
\citation{Ando:2004sb}
\citation{Fogli:2004ff}
\citation{Beacom:2003nk}
\citation{Ando:2004sb}
\citation{Totani:1997vj}
\citation{Thompson:2002mw}
\citation{Keil:2002in}
\citation{Wurm:2006}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {VII}{\ignorespaces Summary of the neutrino properties effect on $\nu _e$ and $\mathaccent "7016\relax {\nu }_e$ signals.}}{13}{}}
\newlabel{tab:Phys-SN-SummaryOscNeut}{{VII}{13}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {VIII}{\ignorespaces DSN expected rates. The larger numbers are computed with the present limit on the flux by SuperKamiokande collaboration. The lower numbers are computed for typical models. The background coming from reator plants have been computed for specific locations for MEMPHYS and LENA. For MEMPHYS, the SuperKamiokande background has been scaled by the exposure. More studies are needed to estimate the background at the new Fréjus laboratory.}}{13}{}}
\newlabel{tab:Phys-SN-DiffuseRates}{{VIII}{13}{}{}{}}
\citation{Yuksel:2005ae}
\citation{Smy:2002rz}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Diffuse supernova neutrino signal and background in LENA detector in 10 years of exposure. Shaded regions give the uncertainties of all curves. An observational window between $\sim 9.5$ to 25\nobreakspace  {}MeV that is almost free of background can be identified (for the Pyh\"asalmi site)\nobreakspace  {}\citep  {Wurm:2006}.}}{14}{}}
\newlabel{fig:Phys-SN-LENAsnr}{{9}{14}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Possible 90\% C.L. measurements of the emission parameters of supernova electron antineutrino emission after 5 years running of a gadolinium-enhanced SK detector or 1 year of one gadolinium-enhanced MEMPHYS shaft \citep  {Yuksel:2005ae}.}}{14}{}}
\newlabel{fig:Phys-DSN-sndpar}{{10}{14}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {VI}Solar neutrinos}{14}{}}
\newlabel{sec:Solar}{{VI}{14}{}{}{}}
\citation{Alimonti:1998nt}
\citation{Alimonti:1998aa}
\citation{Ianni:2005ki}
\citation{Ianni:2005ki}
\citation{Arneodo:2001tx}
\citation{Aharmim:2005gt}
\citation{Gonzalez-Garcia:2002dz}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {IX}{\ignorespaces  Number of events expected in GLACIER per year, compared with the computed background (no oscillation) in the Gran Sasso Laboratory (Italy) rock radioactivity condition (i.e. $0.32\nobreakspace  {}10^{-6}$\nobreakspace  {}n \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$ \mathrm  {cm}^{-2}\nobreakspace  {}\mathrm  {s}^{-1}$}($> 2.5$\nobreakspace  {}MeV). The Absorption channel have been split into the contributions of events from Fermi transition and from Gamow-Teller transition of the ${}^{40}$Ar to the different ${}^{40}$K excited levels and that can be separated using the emitted gamma energy and multiplicity}}{15}{}}
\newlabel{tab:GLACIER-Solar}{{IX}{15}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {VII}Atmospheric Neutrinos}{15}{}}
\newlabel{sec:Phys-Atm-neut}{{VII}{15}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {A}Introduction}{15}{}}
\citation{Daum:1994bf}
\citation{Aglietta:1988be}
\citation{Becker-Szendy:1992hq}
\citation{Hirata:1992ku}
\citation{Fukuda:1998mi}
\citation{Allison:1999ms}
\citation{Ambrosio:2001je}
\citation{Ashie:2005ik}
\citation{Ahn:2006zz}
\citation{Tagg:2006sx}
\citation{Itow:2001ee}
\citation{Ayres:2004js}
\citation{Kim:1998bv}
\citation{Peres:1999yi}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces   Discrimination of the wrong octant solution as a function of $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2\theta _{23}^\mathrm  {true}$, for $\theta _{13}^\mathrm  {true} = 0$. We have assumed 10 years of data taking with a 440-kton detector.}}{16}{}}
\newlabel{fig:octant}{{11}{16}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {B}Oscillation physics}{16}{}}
\citation{huber-2005-71}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces   Sensitivity to the mass hierarchy at $2\sigma $ ($\Delta \chi ^2 = 4$) as a function of $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^22\theta _{13}^\mathrm  {true}$ and $\delta _\mathrm  {CP}^\mathrm  {true}$ (left), and the fraction of true values of $\delta _\mathrm  {CP}^\mathrm  {true}$ (right). The solid curves are the sensitivities from the combination of long-baseline and atmospheric neutrino data, the dashed curves correspond to long-baseline data only. We have assumed 10 years of data taking with a 440-kton detector.}}{17}{}}
\newlabel{fig:hierarchy}{{12}{17}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces   Sensitivity to $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^22\theta _{13}$ as a function of $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2\theta _{23}^\mathrm  {true}$ for LBL data only (dashed), and the combination LBL+ATM (solid). In the left and central panels we restrict the fit of $\theta _{23}$ to the octant corresponding to $\theta _{23}^\mathrm  {true}$ and $\pi /2 - \theta _{23}^\mathrm  {true}$, respectively, whereas the right panel shows the overall sensitivity taking into account both octants. We have assumed 8 years of LBL and 9 years of ATM data taking with the T2HK beam and a 1\nobreakspace  {}Mton detector.}}{17}{}}
\newlabel{fig:theta13}{{13}{17}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {C}Direct detection of $\nu _\tau $ in the atmospheric neutrino flux}{17}{}}
\citation{Gonzalez-Garcia:2004wg}
\citation{Araki:2005qa}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {X}{\ignorespaces Expected background and signal events for different combinations of the $\pi $, $\rho $ and $3\pi $ analyses. The considered statistical sample corresponds to an exposure of 100 kton$\times $year. The best combination found is indicated in bold characters.}}{18}{}}
\newlabel{tab:combi}{{X}{18}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {D}New phenomena beyond the "Standard Model"}{18}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {VIII}Geoneutrinos}{18}{}}
\newlabel{sec:Geo}{{VIII}{18}{}{}{}}
\citation{Fukuda:2002uc}
\citation{Hochmuth:2006}
\citation{Araki:2005qa}
\citation{Bueno:2004dv}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces  Expected number of signal and background events as a function of the WIMP elastic scattering production cross section in the Sun, with a cut of 10 GeV on the minimum neutrino energy.}}{19}{}}
\newlabel{fig:GLACIERdm1}{{14}{19}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {IX}Indirect Search for Dark Matter}{19}{}}
\newlabel{sec:DM}{{IX}{19}{}{}{}}
\citation{Araki:2004mb}
\citation{Petcov:2006gy}
\citation{Choubey:2004bf}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {15}{\ignorespaces  Minimum number of years required to claim a discovery WIMP signal from the Sun in a 100\nobreakspace  {}kton LAr detector as function of $\sigma _{\rm  {elastic}}$ for three values of the WIMP mass.}}{20}{}}
\newlabel{fig:GLACIERdm2}{{15}{20}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {X}Neutrinos from reactors}{20}{}}
\newlabel{sec:Reactor}{{X}{20}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {16}{\ignorespaces The ratio of the event spectra in positron energy in the case of oscillations with $\Delta m_{21}^2 = 7.9\times 10^{-5}$\nobreakspace  {}eV$^2$ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2\theta _{12} = 0.30$ and in the absence of oscillations, determined using one year data of MEMPHYS-Gd and LENA located at Frejus. The error bars correspond to $1\sigma $ statistical error.}}{20}{}}
\newlabel{fig:LENAMEMPHYS-reac-histo}{{16}{20}{}{}{}}
\citation{Schwetz:2006private}
\citation{Meregaglia:2006du}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {17}{\ignorespaces The accuracy of the determination of $\Delta m_{21}^2$ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2\theta _{12}$, which can be obtained using one year of data from MEMPHYS-Gd and LENA at Frejus, and from SK-Gd at Kamioka, compared to the current precision from solar neutrino and KamLAND data. We show the allowed regions at $3\sigma $ (2 d.o.f.) in the $\Delta m_{21}^2-\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2\theta _{12}$ plane, as well as the projections of the $\chi ^2$ for each parameter.}}{21}{}}
\newlabel{fig:reactor-sensitivities}{{17}{21}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {18}{\ignorespaces The accuracy of the determination of $\Delta m_{21}^2$ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2\theta _{12}$, which can be obtained using one year of data from MEMPHYS-Gd as a function of the prompt energy threshold.}}{21}{}}
\newlabel{fig:reactor-MEMPHYS-threshold}{{18}{21}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {XI}Neutrinos from beams}{21}{}}
\newlabel{sec:oscillation}{{XI}{21}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {A}Introduction}{21}{}}
\citation{Ishitsuka:2005qi}
\citation{Gerigk:2006qi}
\citation{Maltoni:2004ei}
\citation{Baldini:2006fi}
\citation{Campagne:2006yx}
\citation{ISS06}
\citation{Catanesi:2001gi}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {19}{\ignorespaces  Sensitivity to discover $\theta _{13}$: the fraction of $\delta _{CP}$ coverage as a function of $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^22\theta _{13}$.}}{22}{}}
\newlabel{fig:fract_disc_theta}{{19}{22}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {B}CNGS upgraded beam}{22}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {20}{\ignorespaces  Mass hierarchy determination for a two detector configuration at baselines of 850\nobreakspace  {}km and 1050\nobreakspace  {}km.}}{22}{}}
\newlabel{fig:fract_disc_dm}{{20}{22}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {C}The CERN-SPL Super Beam}{22}{}}
\newlabel{sec:CERN-SPL}{{XI.C}{22}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {21}{\ignorespaces  Allowed regions of $\Delta m^2_{31}$ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2\theta _{23}$ at 99\%\nobreakspace  {}CL (2 d.o.f.) after 5\nobreakspace  {}yrs of neutrino data taking for SPL, T2K phase\nobreakspace  {}I, T2HK, and the combination of SPL with 5\nobreakspace  {}yrs of atmospheric neutrino data in the MEMPHYS detector. For the true parameter values we use $\Delta m^2_{31} = 2.2\, (2.6) \times 10^{-3}\nobreakspace  {}\mathrm  {eV}^2$ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2\theta _{23} = 0.5 \, (0.37)$ for the test point 1 (2), and $\theta _{13} = 0$ and the solar parameters as: $\Delta m^2_{21} = 7.9 \times 10^{-5}\nobreakspace  {}\mathrm  {eV}^2$, $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2\theta _{12} = 0.3$. The shaded region corresponds to the 99\%\nobreakspace  {}CL region from present SK and K2K data \citep  {Maltoni:2004ei}.}}{23}{}}
\newlabel{fig:Phys-SPL-atm-params}{{21}{23}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {22}{\ignorespaces $3\sigma $ discovery sensitivity to $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^22\theta _{13}$ for $\beta $B, SPL, and T2HK as a function of the true value of \ensuremath  {\delta _{\rm  CP}}\ (left panel) and as a function of the fraction of all possible values of \ensuremath  {\delta _{\rm  CP}}\ (right panel). The width of the bands corresponds to values for the systematical errors between 2\% and 5\%. The dashed curve corresponds to the $\beta $B\ sensitivity with the fluxes reduced by a factor 2.}}{23}{}}
\newlabel{fig:Phys-SPLBB-th13}{{22}{23}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {23}{\ignorespaces CPV discovery potential for $\beta $B, SPL, and T2HK: For parameter values inside the ellipse-shaped curves CP conserving values of \ensuremath  {\delta _{\rm  CP}}\ can be excluded at $3\sigma $ $(\Delta \chi ^2>9)$. The width of the bands corresponds to values for the systematical errors from 2\% to 5\%. The dashed curve is described in Fig.\nobreakspace  {}22{}{}{}\hbox {}.}}{23}{}}
\newlabel{fig:Phys-SPLBB-CPV}{{23}{23}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {D}The CERN-$\beta $B\ baseline scenario}{23}{}}
\newlabel{sec:BetaBeam}{{XI.D}{23}{}{}{}}
\citation{Baldini:2006fi}
\citation{Campagne:2006yx}
\citation{ISS06}
\citation{Rubbia:2006pi}
\citation{Bernabeu:2005jh}
\citation{Sato:2005ma}
\citation{Burguet-Castell:2001ez}
\citation{Fogli:1996pv}
\citation{Minakata:2001qm}
\citation{Campagne:2006yx}
\citation{Campagne:2006yx}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {E}combining SPL Beam and $\beta $B\ with MEMPHYS at Fréjus}{24}{}}
\citation{Badertscher:2005te}
\citation{Bueno:2000fg}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {24}{\ignorespaces Discovery potential of a finite value of $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^22\theta _{13}$ at $3\sigma $ $(\Delta \chi ^2>9)$ for 5\nobreakspace  {}yrs neutrino data from $\beta $B, SPL, and the combination of $\beta $B\ + SPL compared to 10\nobreakspace  {}yrs data from T2HK (2\nobreakspace  {}yrs neutrinos + 8\nobreakspace  {}yrs antineutrinos). }}{25}{}}
\newlabel{fig:Phys-SPLBB-th13-5yrs}{{24}{25}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {F}Neutrino Factory LAr detector}{25}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {25}{\ignorespaces Allowed regions in $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^22\theta _{13}$ and $\delta _{CP}$ for 5\nobreakspace  {}years data (neutrinos only) from $\beta $B, SPL, and the combination. $\mathrm  {H^{tr/wr} (O^{tr/wr})}$ refers to solutions with the true/wrong mass hierarchy (octant of $\theta _{23}$). For the colored regions in the left panel also 5\nobreakspace  {}years of atmospheric data are included; the solution with the wrong hierarchy has $\Delta \chi ^2 = 3.3$. The true parameter values are $\delta _{CP} = -0.85 \pi $, $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^22\theta _{13} = 0.03$, $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2\theta _{23} = 0.6$. For the $\beta $B\ only analysis (middle panel) an external accuracy of 2\% (3\%) for $|\Delta m^2_{31}|$ ($\theta _{23}$) has been assumed, whereas for the left and right panel the default value of 10\% has been used.}}{25}{}}
\newlabel{fig:Phys-SPLBB-degeneracies_5yrs}{{25}{25}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {XI}{\ignorespaces Expected events rates for the GLACIER detector in case no oscillations occur for $10^{20}$ muon decays. We assume E$_\mu $=30 GeV. $N_{tot}$ is the total number of events and $N_{qe}$ is the number of quasi-elastic events.}}{25}{}}
\newlabel{tab:rates}{{XI}{25}{}{}{}}
\citation{Bueno:2001jd}
\bibdata{Laguna}
\bibcite{Abdurashitov:1994bc}{{1}{1994}{{Abdurashitov \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Abdurashitov \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Aglietta:1987we}{{2}{1987}{{Aglietta \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Aglietta \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {26}{\ignorespaces  GLACIER sensitivity for $\theta _{13}$.}}{26}{}}
\newlabel{fig:t13sensitivity}{{26}{26}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {27}{\ignorespaces  GLACIER 90\% C.L. sensitivity on the $CP$-phase $\delta _{CP}$ as a function of $\Delta m^2_{21}$ for the two considered baselines. The reference oscillation parameters are $\Delta m^2_{32}=3\times 10^{-3}\ \rm  eV^2$, $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 \theta _{23} = 0.5$, $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 \theta _{12} = 0.5$, $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 2\theta _{13} = 0.05$ and $\delta _{CP} = 0$. The lower curves are made fixing all parameters to the reference values while for the upper curves $\theta _{13}$ is free.}}{26}{}}
\newlabel{fig:cpsensitivity}{{27}{26}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {XII}Summary}{26}{}}
\newlabel{sec:Phys-Summary}{{XII}{26}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {}Acknowledgments}{26}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {}References}{26}{}}
\bibcite{Aglietta:1988be}{{3}{1989}{{Aglietta \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Aglietta \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Agostinelli:2002hh}{{4}{2003}{{Agostinelli \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Agostinelli \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Aharmim:2005gt}{{5}{2005}{{Aharmim \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Aharmim \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Ahn:2006zz}{{6}{2006}{{Ahn \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Ahn \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Alekseev:1988gp}{{7}{1988}{{Alekseev \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Alekseev, Alekseeva, Krivosheina, and Volchenko}}}
\bibcite{Alimonti:1998nt}{{8}{1998{a}}{{Alimonti \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Alimonti \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Alimonti:1998aa}{{9}{1998{b}}{{Alimonti \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Alimonti \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Allison:1999ms}{{10}{1999}{{Allison \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Allison \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Altmann:2005ix}{{11}{2005}{{Altmann \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Altmann \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Ambrosio:2001je}{{12}{2001}{{Ambrosio \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Ambrosio \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Amerio:2004ze}{{13}{2004}{{Amerio \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Amerio \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Ando:2003ie}{{14}{2003}{{Ando}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Ando:2004sb}{{15}{2004}{{Ando}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Ando:2005ka}{{16}{2005}{{Ando \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Ando, Beacom, and Yuksel}}}
\bibcite{Anselmann:1992um}{{17}{1992}{{Anselmann \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Anselmann \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Antonioli:2004zb}{{18}{2004}{{Antonioli \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Antonioli \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Araki:2005qa}{{19}{2005{a}}{{Araki \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Araki \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Araki:2004mb}{{20}{2005{b}}{{Araki \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Araki \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Arneodo:2001tx}{{21}{2001}{{Arneodo \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Arneodo \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Ashie:2005ik}{{22}{2005}{{Ashie \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Ashie \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Aulakh:2003kg}{{23}{2004}{{Aulakh \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Aulakh, Bajc, Melfo, Senjanovic, and Vissani}}}
\bibcite{Ayres:2004js}{{24}{2004}{{Ayres \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Ayres \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Babu:1992ia}{{25}{1993}{{Babu and Mohapatra}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Back:2004zn}{{26}{2004}{{Back \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Back \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {XII}{\ignorespaces  Brief summary of the physics potential of the proposed detectors for non-accelerator based topics. The (*) stands for the case where one MEMPHYS shaft is filled with Gadolinium.}}{27}{}}
\newlabel{tab:Phys-potential-summary1}{{XII}{27}{}{}{}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {XIII}{\ignorespaces  Brief summary of the physics potential of the proposed detectors for accelerator oscillation topic. \color  {red}To be completed\color  {black}}}{27}{}}
\newlabel{tab:Phys-potential-summary2}{{XIII}{27}{}{}{}}
\bibcite{Badertscher:2005te}{{27}{2005}{{Badertscher \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Badertscher, Laffranchi, Meregaglia, Muller, and Rubbia}}}
\bibcite{Bajc:2002pg}{{28}{2002{a}}{{Bajc \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Bajc, Fileviez~Perez, and Senjanovic}}}
\bibcite{Bajc:2002bv}{{29}{2002{b}}{{Bajc \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Bajc, Fileviez~Perez, and Senjanovic}}}
\bibcite{Baldini:2006fi}{{30}{2006}{{Baldini \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Baldini \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Barger:2005it}{{31}{2005}{{Barger \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Barger, Huber, and Marfatia}}}
\bibcite{Beacom:2002hs}{{32}{2002}{{Beacom \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Beacom, Farr, and Vogel}}}
\bibcite{Beacom:2003nk}{{33}{2004}{{Beacom and Vagins}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Becker-Szendy:1992hq}{{34}{1992}{{Becker-Szendy \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Becker-Szendy \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{deBellefon:2006vq}{{35}{2006}{{de~Bellefon \emph  {et~al.}}}{{de~Bellefon \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Bernabeu:2005jh}{{36}{2005}{{Bernabeu \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Bernabeu, Burguet-Castell, Espinoza, and Lindroos}}}
\bibcite{Bionta:1987qt}{{37}{1987}{{Bionta \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Bionta \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Birk}{{38}{1964}{{Birks}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Bueno:2001jd}{{39}{2002}{{Bueno \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Bueno, Campanelli, Navas-Concha, and Rubbia}}}
\bibcite{Bueno:2000fg}{{40}{2000}{{Bueno \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Bueno, Campanelli, and Rubbia}}}
\bibcite{Bueno:2004dv}{{41}{2005}{{Bueno \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Bueno, Cid, Navas-Concha, Hooper, and Weiler}}}
\bibcite{Bueno:2007um}{{42}{2007}{{Bueno \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Bueno \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Burguet-Castell:2001ez}{{43}{2001}{{Burguet-Castell \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Burguet-Castell, Gavela, Gomez-Cadenas, Hernandez, and Mena}}}
\bibcite{Cadonati:2000kq}{{44}{2002}{{Cadonati \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Cadonati, Calaprice, and Chen}}}
\bibcite{Campagne:2006yx}{{45}{2006}{{Campagne \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Campagne, Maltoni, Mezzetto, and Schwetz}}}
\bibcite{Catanesi:2001gi}{{46}{2001}{{Catanesi \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Catanesi \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Choubey:2004bf}{{47}{2004}{{Choubey and Petcov}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Cocco:2004ac}{{48}{2004}{{Cocco \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Cocco, Ereditato, Fiorillo, Mangano, and Pettorino}}}
\bibcite{Daum:1994bf}{{49}{1995}{{Daum \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Daum \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Davis:1968cp}{{50}{1968}{{Davis \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Davis, Harmer, and Hoffman}}}
\bibcite{Dighe:2003be}{{51}{2003{a}}{{Dighe \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Dighe, Keil, and Raffelt}}}
\bibcite{Dighe:2003jg}{{52}{2003{b}}{{Dighe \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Dighe, Keil, and Raffelt}}}
\bibcite{Dighe:1999bi}{{53}{2000}{{Dighe and Smirnov}}{{}}}
\bibcite{ISS06}{{54}{2006}{{Dornan \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Dornan \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Dorsner:2004xa}{{55}{2005{a}}{{Dorsner and Perez}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Dorsner:2005fq}{{56}{2005{b}}{{Dorsner and Perez}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Dorsner:2005ii}{{57}{2006}{{Dorsner \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Dorsner, Perez, and Gonzalez~Felipe}}}
\bibcite{Duan:2006an}{{58}{2006}{{Duan \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Duan, Fuller, Carlson, and Qian}}}
\bibcite{Emmanuel-Costa:2003pu}{{59}{2003}{{Emmanuel-Costa and Wiesenfeldt}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Ereditato:2004ru}{{60}{2005}{{Ereditato and Rubbia}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Fogli:1996pv}{{61}{1996}{{Fogli and Lisi}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Fogli:2004gy}{{62}{2004}{{Fogli \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Fogli, Lisi, Mirizzi, and Montanino}}}
\bibcite{Fogli:2004ff}{{63}{2005}{{Fogli \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Fogli, Lisi, Mirizzi, and Montanino}}}
\bibcite{Fogli:2003dw}{{64}{2003}{{Fogli \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Fogli, Lisi, Montanino, and Mirizzi}}}
\bibcite{Friedmann:2002ty}{{65}{2003}{{Friedmann and Witten}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Fukuda:1998mi}{{66}{1998}{{Fukuda \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Fukuda \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Fukuda:2002uc}{{67}{2003}{{Fukuda \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Fukuda \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Fukugita:2002qw}{{68}{2003}{{Fukugita and Kawasaki}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Fukuyama:2004pb}{{69}{2004}{{Fukuyama \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Fukuyama, Ilakovac, Kikuchi, Meljanac, and Okada}}}
\bibcite{Georgi:1974sy}{{70}{1974}{{Georgi and Glashow}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Gerigk:2006qi}{{71}{2006}{{Gerigk \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Gerigk \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Gil-Botella:2003sz}{{72}{2003}{{Gil-Botella and Rubbia}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Gil-Botella:2004bv}{{73}{2004}{{Gil-Botella and Rubbia}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Goh:2003nv}{{74}{2004}{{Goh \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Goh, Mohapatra, Nasri, and Ng}}}
\bibcite{Gonzalez-Garcia:2004wg}{{75}{2004}{{Gonzalez-Garcia and Maltoni}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Gonzalez-Garcia:2002dz}{{76}{2003}{{Gonzalez-Garcia and Nir}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Hannestad:2006nj}{{77}{2006}{{Hannestad \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Hannestad, Raffelt, Sigl, and Wong}}}
\bibcite{Hirata:1987hu}{{78}{1987}{{Hirata \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Hirata \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Hirata:1988uy}{{79}{1988{a}}{{Hirata \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Hirata \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Hirata:1988ad}{{80}{1988{b}}{{Hirata \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Hirata \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Hirata:1989zj}{{81}{1989}{{Hirata \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Hirata \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Hirata:1992ku}{{82}{1992}{{Hirata \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Hirata \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Hochmuth:2006}{{83}{2005}{{Hochmuth \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Hochmuth \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{huber-2005-71}{{84}{2005}{{Huber \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Huber, Maltoni, and Schwetz}}}
\bibcite{Ianni:2005ki}{{85}{2005}{{Ianni \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Ianni, Montanino, and Villante}}}
\bibcite{Ishitsuka:2005qi}{{86}{2005}{{Ishitsuka \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Ishitsuka, Kajita, Minakata, and Nunokawa}}}
\bibcite{Itow:2001ee}{{87}{2001}{{Itow \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Itow \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Jung:1999jq}{{88}{2000}{{Jung}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Kachelriess:2004ds}{{89}{2005}{{Kachelriess \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Kachelriess \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Keil:2002in}{{90}{2003}{{Keil \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Keil, Raffelt, and Janka}}}
\bibcite{Kim:1998bv}{{91}{1998}{{Kim and Lee}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Kobayashi:2005pe}{{92}{2005}{{Kobayashi \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Kobayashi \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Lee:1994vp}{{93}{1995}{{Lee \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Lee, Mohapatra, Parida, and Rani}}}
\bibcite{Lunardini:2001pb}{{94}{2001}{{Lunardini and Smirnov}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Lunardini:2003eh}{{95}{2003}{{Lunardini and Smirnov}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Malek:2002ns}{{96}{2003}{{Malek \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Malek \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Maltoni:2004ei}{{97}{2004}{{Maltoni \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Maltoni, Schwetz, Tortola, and Valle}}}
\bibcite{Undagoitia:1-2uu}{{98}{2005}{{{Marrod\'an Undagoitia} \emph  {et~al.}}}{{{Marrod\'an Undagoitia} \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Marrodan:2006}{{99}{2006}{{{Marrod\'an Undagoitia} \emph  {et~al.}}}{{{Marrod\'an Undagoitia} \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Meregaglia:2006du}{{100}{2006}{{Meregaglia and Rubbia}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Minakata:2001qm}{{101}{2001}{{Minakata and Nunokawa}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Murayama:2001ur}{{102}{2002}{{Murayama and Pierce}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Nakaya:2005nk}{{103}{2005}{{Nakaya}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Nath:2006ut}{{104}{2006}{{Nath and Perez}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Oberauer:2005kw}{{105}{2005}{{Oberauer \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Oberauer, von Feilitzsch, and Potzel}}}
\bibcite{Odrzywolek:2003vn}{{106}{2004}{{Odrzywolek \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Odrzywolek, Misiaszek, and Kutschera}}}
\bibcite{Peres:1999yi}{{107}{1999}{{Peres and Smirnov}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Petcov:2006gy}{{108}{2006}{{Petcov and Schwetz}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Rubbia:2004tz}{{109}{2004{a}}{{Rubbia}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Rubbia:2004yq}{{110}{2004{b}}{{Rubbia}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Rubbia:2006pi}{{111}{2006}{{Rubbia \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Rubbia, Ferrari, Kadi, and Vlachoudis}}}
\bibcite{Sato:2005ma}{{112}{2005}{{Sato}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Schirato:2002tg}{{113}{2002}{{Schirato \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Schirato, Fuller, LANL), UCSD, and LANL)}}}
\bibcite{Schwetz:2006private}{{114}{2006}{{Schwetz}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Smy:2002rz}{{115}{2003}{{Smy}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Tagg:2006sx}{{116}{2006}{{Tagg}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Thompson:2002mw}{{117}{2003}{{Thompson \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Thompson, Burrows, and Pinto}}}
\bibcite{Tomas:2003xn}{{118}{2003}{{Tomas \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Tomas, Semikoz, Raffelt, Kachelriess, and Dighe}}}
\bibcite{Tomas:2004gr}{{119}{2004}{{Tomas \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Tomas \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Totani:1997vj}{{120}{1998}{{Totani \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Totani, Sato, Dalhed, and Wilson}}}
\bibcite{Wurm:2006}{{121}{2006}{{Wurm \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Wurm \emph  {et~al.}}}}
\bibcite{Yuksel:2005ae}{{122}{2006}{{Yuksel \emph  {et~al.}}}{{Yuksel, Ando, and Beacom}}}
\global \chardef \firstnote@num\z@ \relax 
\bibstyle{apsrmp}
\newlabel{LastPage}{{}{28}}
\newlabel{LastBibItem}{{122}{29}{}{}{}}