source: Backup NB/Talks/MEMPHYSetal/LAGUNA/EU I3/PhysicsLatex/Laguna-before-xarchiv/nusolar_det.tex @ 416

Last change on this file since 416 was 416, checked in by campagne, 16 years ago
File size: 9.6 KB
Line 
1\section{Solar neutrinos}
2\label{sec:Solar}
3%\REDBLA{Version 0 from J.E.C 3/3/06}
4%\REDBLA{update by A. Bueno 23/3/06}
5%\REDBLA{update by T. Marrodan Undagoitia  13/4/06}
6%\REDBLA{update by JEC 26/9/06}
7%\REDBLA{update by JEC 16/10/06: this is a section now}
8%
9In the past years Water \v{C}herenkov detectors have measured the high energy tail ($E>5$~MeV)
10of the solar $^{8}$B neutrino flux using electron-neutrino
11elastic scattering \cite{Smy:2002rz}.
12Since such detectors could record the time of an interaction and reconstruct
13the energy and direction of the recoiling electron, unique information
14of the spectrum and time variation of the solar neutrino flux was extracted.
15This provided further insights into the ``solar neutrino problem'',
16the deficit of the neutrino flux (measured by several experiments)
17with respect to the flux expected by the standard solar models.
18It also constrained the neutrino flavor oscillation solutions in a fairly
19model-independent way.
20
21With MEMPHYS,  Super-Kamiokande's measurements obtained from 1258 days
22of data could be repeated in about half a year (the seasonal flux variation
23measurement requires of course a full year). In particular, a first
24measurement of the flux of the rare "hep" neutrinos may be possible.
25Elastic neutrino-electron scattering is strongly forward peaked.
26To separate the solar neutrino signal from the isotropic background events (mainly due to low radioactivity), this
27directional correlation is exploited. Angular resolution is limited
28by multiple scattering.  The reconstruction algorithm first reconstructs
29the vertex from the PMT times and then the direction assuming a single
30Cherenkov cone originating from the reconstructed vertex.
31%JEC 26/9/06 START
32Reconstructing 7~MeV events in MEMPHYS seems not to be a problem but decreasing the threshold would imply serious care of the PMT dark current rate as well as the laboratory and detector radioactivity level.
33%JEC 26/9/06 END
34
35%T. Marrodan Undagoitia  13/4/06 START
36
37%T. Marrodan Undagoitia  10/12/06 START Some corrections
38%\REDBLA{
39
40With LENA, a large amount of neutrinos from ${}^{7}$Be, around $\sim
415.4\times10^3$/day ($\sim 2.0\times10^6$/y) would be
42detected. Depending on the signal-to-background ratio, this would
43provide a sensitivity for time variations in the $^{7}$Be neutrino
44flux of $\sim 0.5$\% during one month of measuring time. Such a
45sensitivity may give information at a unique level on helioseismology
46(pressure or temperature fluctuations in the center of the sun) and on
47a possible magnetic moment interaction with a timely varying solar
48magnetic field.
49
50The {\it pep} neutrinos are expected to be recorded at a
51rate of $210$/day ($\sim 7.7\times10^4$/y), these neutrinos would
52provide a better understanding of the global solar neutrino
53luminosity. Due to the value of their energy, they could probe the
54transition region of vacuum to matter-dominated neutrino oscillation.
55
56The neutrino flux from the CNO cycle is theoretically
57predicted with the lowest accuracy (30\%) of all solar neutrino
58fluxes. Therefore, LENA would provide a new opportunity for a detailed
59study of solar physics. However, the observation of such solar
60neutrinos in these detectors, i.e. through elastic scattering, is not
61a simple task, since neutrino events cannot be separated from the
62background, and it can be accomplished only if the detector
63contamination will be kept very
64low~\cite{Alimonti:1998aa,Alimonti:1998nt}. Moreover, only
65mono-energetic sources as such mentioned can be detected, taking
66advantage of the Compton-like shoulder edge produced in the event
67spectrum.
68
69Recently, the possibility to register ${}^8$B solar neutrinos by means
70of the charged current interaction with the
71${}^{13}$C~\cite{Ianni:2005ki} nuclei naturally contained in organic
72scintillators has been investigated. Even if the event signal does not
73keep the directionality of the neutrino, it can be separated from the
74background by exploiting the time and space coincidence with the
75subsequent decay of the produced ${}^{13}$N nuclei (remaining
76background of about $~60$/year corresponding to a reduction factor of
77$\sim 3~10^{-4}$) \cite{Ianni:2005ki}. Around 360~events of this type
78per year can be estimated for LENA. A deformation due to the
79MSW-effect should be observable in the low-energy regime after a
80couple of years of measurements.
81
82For the proposed location of LENA in Pyh\"asalmi ($\sim 4000$~m.w.e.),
83the cosmogenic background will be sufficiently low for the mentioned
84measurements. Notice that Fréjus site would also be adequate for this
85topic ($\sim 4800$~m.w.e.). The radioactivity of the detector would
86have to be kept very low ($10^{-17}$~g/g level U-Th) as in the KamLAND
87detector.
88%}
89 %T. Marrodan Undagoitia 10/12/06 END Some corrections
90
91%T. Marrodan Undagoitia 13/4/06 END
92
93%%With LENA, one would in principle get a large amount of  neutrinos from ${}^{7}$Be ($\sim 5.4~10^3$/day) to test small flux fluctuation in time over the general seasonal variation. The {\it pep} neutrinos as well as the CNO cycle induced neutrinos are expected also to be recorded at a rate of $300$/day, this would constraint the CNO contribution to the solar energy release and to better understand the global solar neutrino luminosity. However, the observation of such solar neutrinos in these detectors, through í.e elastic scattering, is not a simple task, since neutrino
94%%events cannot be separated from the background, and it can be accomplished
95%%only if the detector contamination will be kept very low \cite{AlmontiSolar}. Moreover, only
96%%mono-energetic sources as such mentioned can be detected, taking
97%%advantage of the Compton-like shoulder edge produced in the event spectrum.
98%%Recently, it has been investigated the possibility to register  $\sim 1000$/year ${}^8$B solar neutrinos by means of the charged current interaction with the ${}^{13}$C nuclei naturally contained in organic scintillators. Even, if the event signal does not keep the directionality of the neutrino, it can be separated from the background by exploiting the time and space coincidence with the subsequent decay of the produced ${}^{13}$N nuclei (remaining background of about $~60$/year corresponding to a redution factor of $\sim 3~10^{-4}$.) \cite{Ianni:2005ki}. The propose LENA location in Pyh\"asalmi ($\sim 4000$~m.w.e.) means that the cosmogenic background will be sufficiently low for the proposed measure. Notice that Fréjus location would be also good in this respect ($\sim 4800$~m.w.e.). The radioactivity of the detector would have to be kept very low ($10^{-17}$~g/g level U-Th) as in the KamLAND detector. \REDBLA{To be completed...}
99
100The solar neutrinos in GLACIER can be registered through the elastic scattering $\nu_x + e^- \rightarrow \nu_x + e^-$ (ES) and the absorption reaction $\nu_e + {}^{40}Ar \rightarrow e^- + {}^{40}K^*$ (ABS) followed by $\gamma$s emission. Even if these reactions have low threshold (e.g $1.5$~MeV for the second one), one expects to operate in practice with a threshold set at 5~MeV on the primary electron kinetic energy to reject background from neutron capture followed by gamma ray emission which constitute the main background in some underground laboratory \cite{Arneodo:2001tx} as for the LNGS (Italy). These neutrons are induced by the spontaneous fission of the cavern rock (note that in case of a salt mine this background may be significantly reduced).
101
102The expected raw event rate is 330,000/year (66\% from ABS, 25\% from ES and 9\% from neutron background induced events) assuming the above mentioned threshold on the final electron energy. Then, applying further offline cuts to purify separatly the ES sample and the ABS sample, one gets the rates shown on \refTab{tab:GLACIER-Solar}.
103\begin{table}
104                \caption{\label{tab:GLACIER-Solar} Number of events expected in GLACIER per year, compared with the computed background (no oscillation) in the Gran Sasso Laboratory (Italy) rock radioactivity condition (i.e. $0.32~10^{-6}$~n \flux ($> 2.5$~MeV). The Absorption channel have been split into the contributions of events from Fermi transition and from Gamow-Teller transition of the ${}^{40}$Ar to the different ${}^{40}$K excited levels and that can be separated using the emitted gamma energy and multiplicity} 
105                \begin{tabular}{lr}\hline\hline
106                                                        & Events/year \\ \hline
107Elastic channel ($E\geq5$~MeV)   &   45,300 \\
108Neutron bkgd                                                    &         1,400 \\
109Absorption events contamination   & 1,100 \\ \hline
110Absorption channel (Gamow-Teller transition)    & 101,700 \\
111Absorption channel (Fermi transition)   & 59,900 \\
112Neutron bkgd                                                    & 5,500 \\                                             
113Elastic events contamination      & 1,700 \\           
114                        \hline\hline
115                \end{tabular}
116\end{table}
117
118A possible way to combine the ES and the ABS channels similar to the NC/CC flux ratio measured by SNO collaboration \cite{Aharmim:2005gt}, is to compute the following ratio:
119\begin{equation}
120        R = \frac{N^{ES}/N^{ES}_0}{\frac{1}{2}\left( N^{Abs-GT}/N^{Abs-GT}_0 + N^{Abs-F}/N^{Abs-F}_0\right)}
121\end{equation}
122%Antonio Bueno 23/03/06 START
123where the numbers of expected events without neutrino oscillations are labeled with a $0$).
124This double ratio has the following advantages:
125first it is independent of the ${}^{8}$B total neutrino flux, predicted by different solar models,
126and second it is free of experimental threshold energy bias and of the adopted cross-sections
127for the different channels.
128With the present fit to solar and KamLAND data, one expects a value of $R = 1.30\pm 0.01$ after one year of data taking with GLACIER.
129The quoted error for R only takes into account statistics.
130%Antonio Bueno 23/03/06 END
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.