source: Backup NB/Talks/MEMPHYSetal/LAGUNA/EU I3/PhysicsLatex/Laguna-before-xarchiv/reactor_det.tex @ 416

Last change on this file since 416 was 416, checked in by campagne, 16 years ago
File size: 6.5 KB
Line 
1\section{Neutrinos from reactors}
2\label{sec:Reactor}
3%\REDBLA{Version 0 by JEC 2/3/06}
4%\REDBLA{updated by A. Bueno 23/3/06}
5%\REDBLA{updated by JEC 16/10/06: this is a section now}
6%\REDBLA{updated by JEC 20/10/06}
7%\REDBLA{updated by JEC 24/10/06}
8%
9 %T. Marrodan Undagoitia  10/12/06 START Small corrections
10%\REDBLA{
11The KamLAND 1~kT liquid scintillator detector located at Kamioka in
12Japan had measured the flux of 53 power reactors corresponding to
13701~Joule/cm${}^{2}$ \cite{Araki:2004mb}. An event rate of
14$365.2\pm23.7$ above 2.6~MeV for an exposure of 766~ton.y from this
15nuclear power reactors was expected. The observed rate was 258 events
16with a total of background of $17.8\pm7.3$. The clear deficit
17interpreted in terms of neutrino oscillation enables a measurement
18of $\theta_{12}$, the neutrino 1-2 family mixing angle
19($\sin^2\theta_{12} = 0.31^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$) as well as the mass
20squared difference $\Delta m^2_{12} = 7.9\pm0.3~10^{-5}$eV${}^2$
21(error quoted at $1~\sigma$).
22
23Future precision measurements are currently been
24investigated. Running KamLAND
25for 2-3 more years would gain 30\% (4\%) reduction in the spread of
26$\Delta m^2_{12}$ ($\theta_{12}$).
27%JEC 20/10/06 START include text from Schwetz & Petcov {Petcov:2006gy}
28 Although it has been shown in sections \ref{sec:SN} and \ref{sec:Geo}
29that $\bar{\nu}_e$ originated from nuclear reactors can be a serious
30background for diffuse supernova neutrino and geoneutrino detections,
31the Fréjus site can take benefit of the nuclear reactors located in
32the Rh\^one valley to measure $\Delta m_{21}^2$ and $\sin^2\theta_{12}$.
33%}
34 %T. Marrodan Undagoitia  10/12/06 END Small corrections
35
36
37
38In fact approximately 67\% of the total reactor
39$\bar{\nu}_e$ flux at Fréjus originates from four nuclear power plants
40in the Rhone valley, located at distances between 115~km and 160~km.
41The indicated baselines are particularly suitable for
42the study of the $\bar{\nu}_e$ oscillations driven by $\Delta m_{21}^2$---they
43are similar to those exploited in the KamLAND experiment.
44%
45The authors of \cite{Petcov:2006gy} have investigated the possibility to use
46one module of MEMPHYS (147~kt fiducial mass) doped with Gadolinium (MEMPHYS-Gd) or the LENA detector, updating the previous work of \cite{Choubey:2004bf}.
47%T. Marrodan Undagoitia  10/12/06 START Small corrections
48%\REDBLA{
49 Above 3~MeV (2.6~MeV) the event rate is 59,980 (16,670) events/yr for
50MEMPHYS-Gd (LENA), which is 2 orders of magnitude larger than the
51KamLAND event rate. 
52%}
53%T. Marrodan Undagoitia  10/12/06 END Small corrections
54
55 
56\begin{figure}
57\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{./figures/LENAMEMPHYS-reac-histogram.eps}
58%
59  \caption{The ratio of the event spectra in positron energy
60  in the case of oscillations with $\Delta m_{21}^2 = 7.9\times 10^{-5}$~eV$^2$ and
61  $\sin^2\theta_{12} = 0.30$ and in the absence of oscillations,
62  determined using one year data of MEMPHYS-Gd and LENA located at Frejus.
63  The error bars correspond to $1\sigma$ statistical error.}
64
65\label{fig:LENAMEMPHYS-reac-histo}
66\end{figure}
67
68To test the sensitivity of the experiments the prompt energy
69spectrum is divided into 20 bins between 3~MeV
70and 12~MeV for MEMPHYS-Gd and SK-Gd, and into 25 bins between 2.6~MeV and
7110~MeV for LENA (\refFig{fig:LENAMEMPHYS-reac-histo}).
72
73A $\chi^2$ analysis taking into account the statistical and systematical errors shows that each of the two
74detectors, MEMPHYS-Gd and LENA, if placed at Fréjus, would allow a
75very precise determination of the solar neutrino oscillation
76parameters $\Delta m_{21}^2$ and $\sin^2\theta_{12}$: with one year, the
773$\sigma$ uncertainties on $\Delta m_{21}^2$ and $\sin^2\theta_{12}$ can be
78reduced respectively to less than 3\% and to approximately 20\% (see also \refFig{fig:reactor-sensitivities}). In comparison, the
79Gadolinium doped Super-Kamiokande detector (SK-Gd) that might be envisaged in a near future can reach
80a similar precision if the SK/MEMPHYS fiducial mass ratio of 1 to 7 is
81compensated by a longer SK-Gd data taking time.
82%
83\begin{figure}
84\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{./figures/memphys-sk-sol-lena.eps}
85%
86  \caption{The accuracy of the determination of $\Delta m_{21}^2$ and
87  $\sin^2\theta_{12}$, which can be obtained using one year of data
88  from MEMPHYS-Gd and LENA at Frejus, and from SK-Gd at Kamioka,
89  compared to the current precision from solar neutrino and KamLAND
90  data. We show the allowed regions at $3\sigma$ (2 d.o.f.) in the
91  $\Delta m_{21}^2-\sin^2\theta_{12}$ plane, as well as the projections of the
92  $\chi^2$ for each parameter.}
93
94\label{fig:reactor-sensitivities}
95\end{figure}
96%
97Several years of reactor $\bar{\nu}_e$ data collected by
98MEMPHYS-Gd or LENA would allow a determination
99of $\Delta m_{21}^2$ and $\sin^2\theta_{12}$ with
100uncertainties of approximately 1\% and 10\% at 3$\sigma$,
101respectively.
102
103However, some caveat are worth to be mentioned. The prompt energy trigger of 3~MeV requires a very low PMT dark current rate in case of MEMPHYS detector. If the energy threshold is higher then the parameter precision decreases as can be seen on \refFig{fig:reactor-MEMPHYS-threshold} \cite{Schwetz:2006private}. The systematic uncertainties are also an important factor in the experiments under consideration, especially the determination of the
104mixing angle (eg. the energy scale and the overall normalization).
105%
106\begin{figure}
107\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{./figures/MEMPHYSGdreactorthreshold.eps}
108%
109  \caption{The accuracy of the determination of $\Delta m_{21}^2$ and
110  $\sin^2\theta_{12}$, which can be obtained using one year of data
111  from MEMPHYS-Gd as a function of the prompt energy threshold.}
112
113\label{fig:reactor-MEMPHYS-threshold}
114\end{figure}
115%
116Anyhow the accuracies on the solar oscillation parameters, which can be
117obtained in the high statistics experiments considered here are
118comparable to those that can be reached for the atmospheric neutrino
119oscillation parameters $\Delta m_{31}^2$ and $\sin^2\theta_{23}$ in future
120long-baseline superbeam experiments like T2HK in Japan or SPL from
121CERN to MEMPHYS. Hence, such reactor measurements would complete the
122program of the high precision determination of the leading neutrino
123oscillation parameters.
124%JEC 20/10/06 AND
125
126%It has been shown that using \WC\ loaded with Gadolinium to increase by a factor 10 the neutron capture  one can expect 80\% (34\%) reduction of the spread of  $\Delta m^2_{12}$ ($\theta_{12}$) in 110~kT.y exposure at Kamioka using SuperKamiokande.
127%
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.