| 1 | \subsection{Proton decay}
|
|---|
| 2 |
|
|---|
| 3 | Proton decay is one of the few predictions of Grand Unified Theories
|
|---|
| 4 | that can be tested in low-energy experiments. Its discovery would
|
|---|
| 5 | definitely testify for a more fundamental structure beyond the Standard
|
|---|
| 6 | Model.
|
|---|
| 7 |
|
|---|
| 8 | In the past twenty years, the first generation (IMB, Fr{\'e}jus, Kamiokande)
|
|---|
| 9 | and second generation (Super-Kamiokande) proton decay experiments have
|
|---|
| 10 | already put stringent lower limits on the partial proton lifetimes,
|
|---|
| 11 | qualitatively ruling out non-supersymmetric $SU(5)$ theories (first generation)
|
|---|
| 12 | and the minimal supersymmetric $SU(5)$ theory (second generation).
|
|---|
| 13 | A megaton-scale
|
|---|
| 14 | water \v{C}erenkov detector would improve further the experimental sensitivity
|
|---|
| 15 | to proton decay by more than one order of magnitude and allow to probe
|
|---|
| 16 | non-minimal $SU(5)$ models as well as other types of GUTs, such as $SO(10)$,
|
|---|
| 17 | flipped $SU(5)$ and higher-dimensional GUTs.
|
|---|
| 18 | Indeed, recent experimental and theoretical progresses point
|
|---|
| 19 | towards smaller values of the partial lifetime of the proton into
|
|---|
| 20 | $\pi^0 e^+$, implying that this decay mode -- the most
|
|---|
| 21 | model-independent one -- is not out of reach, contrary to previous
|
|---|
| 22 | expectations. Using the new, more accurate lattice calculation of
|
|---|
| 23 | the nucleon decay matrix element one can estimate
|
|---|
| 24 | $\tau (p \rightarrow \pi^0 e^+)
|
|---|
| 25 | \approx 10^{35}\, \mbox{yrs}\, (M_X / 10^{16}\,
|
|---|
| 26 | \mbox{GeV})^4\,
|
|---|
| 27 | ((1/25) / \alpha_{GUT})^2$,
|
|---|
| 28 | where $M_X$ is the mass of the
|
|---|
| 29 | superheavy gauge bosons mediating proton decay,
|
|---|
| 30 | $\alpha_{GUT}
|
|---|
| 31 | \equiv g^2_{GUT} / 4 \pi$ and $g_{GUT}$ is the value of the GUT
|
|---|
| 32 | gauge coupling at the unification scale. This is to be compared
|
|---|
| 33 | with the present Super-Kamiokande lower limit ($5 \times 10^{33}\,
|
|---|
| 34 | \mbox{yrs}$), and with the expected sensivity of a megaton water
|
|---|
| 35 | \v{C}erenkov detector ($10^{35}\, \mbox{yrs}$ after 10 years
|
|---|
| 36 | of data taking for MEMPHYS).
|
|---|
| 37 |
|
|---|
| 38 | The dominant decay channel in supersymmetric GUTs,
|
|---|
| 39 | $p \rightarrow K^+ \bar \nu$, is much more model-dependent. The corresponding
|
|---|
| 40 | decay rate indeed depends on the couplings and masses of the supersymmetric
|
|---|
| 41 | partners of the heavy colour-triplet Higgs bosons, and on the details of the
|
|---|
| 42 | sparticle spectrum. The effective triplet mass, in particular, is extremely
|
|---|
| 43 | dependent on the GUT model.
|
|---|
| 44 | %In the
|
|---|
| 45 | %simplest models, $\tau (p \rightarrow K^+ \bar \nu)$ strongly depends on
|
|---|
| 46 | %$\tan \beta$, the ratio of the vevs of the two Higgs bosons of the MSSM;
|
|---|
| 47 | %larger values of $\tan \beta$ yield shorter values of
|
|---|
| 48 | %$\tau (p \rightarrow K^+ \bar \nu)$.
|
|---|
| 49 | In many models, one finds an upper limit $\tau (p \rightarrow K^+ \bar \nu)
|
|---|
| 50 | \leq \mbox{few}\, 10^{34}\, \mbox{yrs}$
|
|---|
| 51 | \cite{Dermisek:2000hr}\cite{Babu:1998wi}\cite{Altarelli:2000fu},
|
|---|
| 52 | to be compared with the present Super-Kamioka nde lower limit
|
|---|
| 53 | ($1.6 \times 10^{33}\, \mbox{yrs}$), and with the expected sensivity of
|
|---|
| 54 | a megaton water \v{C}erenkov detector ($2 \times 10^{34}\, \mbox{yrs}$ after
|
|---|
| 55 | 10 years for MEMPHYS).
|
|---|
| 56 |
|
|---|
| 57 | There are many more decay channels that could be accessible to a megaton
|
|---|
| 58 | water \v{C}erenkov detector. The measurement of several partial lifetimes
|
|---|
| 59 | would allow to discriminate between different Grand Unified models, at a time
|
|---|
| 60 | when, after several years of LHC running,
|
|---|
| 61 | the supersymmetry landscape will be drastically clarified,
|
|---|
| 62 | through discovery or severe exclusion limits. Therefore the predictions
|
|---|
| 63 | of proton lifetime, in constrained or more general supersymmetric models,
|
|---|
| 64 | will be sharpened even further.
|
|---|
| 65 |
|
|---|
| 66 |
|
|---|