[387] | 1 | \section{Underground laboratory and detector} |
---|
| 2 | |
---|
| 3 | \subsection{Results of a feasibility study in the |
---|
| 4 | central region of the Fr\'ejus tunnels} |
---|
| 5 | \label{sec:undlab} |
---|
| 6 | The site located in the Fr\'ejus mountain in the Alps, |
---|
| 7 | which is crossed by a road-tunnel connecting France (Modane) |
---|
| 8 | to Italy (Bardonecchia), has a number of interesting characteristics |
---|
| 9 | making it a very good candidate for the installation of a megaton-scale |
---|
| 10 | detector in Europe, aimed both at non-accelerator and accelerator |
---|
| 11 | based physics. |
---|
| 12 | Its great depth (4800 mwe, see figure~\ref{muonflux}), |
---|
| 13 | the good quality of the rock, |
---|
| 14 | the fact that it offers horizontal access, its distance from CERN (130 km), |
---|
| 15 | the opportunity of the excavation of a second (``safety'') tunnel, |
---|
| 16 | the very easy access by train (TGV), by car (highways) |
---|
| 17 | and by plane (Geneva, Torino and Lyon airports), |
---|
| 18 | the strong support from the local authorities |
---|
| 19 | represent the most important of these characteristics. |
---|
| 20 | |
---|
| 21 | \begin{figure}[htb] |
---|
| 22 | \centerline{\epsfig{figure=./figures/muonflux_red.eps,width=8cm}} |
---|
| 23 | \caption{\it Muon flux as a function of overburden. |
---|
| 24 | The Frejus site is indicated by "LSM".} |
---|
| 25 | \label{muonflux} |
---|
| 26 | \end{figure} |
---|
| 27 | |
---|
| 28 | On the basis of these arguments, the DSM (CEA) and IN2P3 (CNRS) institutions |
---|
| 29 | decided to perform a feasibility study of a Large Underground Laboratory |
---|
| 30 | in the central region of the Fr\'ejus tunnel, near the already existing, |
---|
| 31 | but much smaller, LSM Laboratory. This preliminary study |
---|
| 32 | has been performed by the SETEC (French) and STONE (Italian) companies |
---|
| 33 | and is now completed. These companies already made the study and managed |
---|
| 34 | the realisation of the Fr\'ejus road tunnel and of the LSM |
---|
| 35 | (Laboratoire Souterain de Modane) Laboratory. |
---|
| 36 | A large number of precise and systematic measurements of the rock |
---|
| 37 | characteristics, performed at that time, have been used to make a |
---|
| 38 | pre-selection of the most favourable regions along the road tunnel |
---|
| 39 | and to constrain the simulations of the present pre-study for the |
---|
| 40 | Large Laboratory. |
---|
| 41 | |
---|
| 42 | \begin{figure}[htb] |
---|
| 43 | \centerline{\epsfig{figure=./figures/tunnel.eps,width=8cm,}} |
---|
| 44 | \caption{\it Possible layout of the Fr\'ejus underground laboratory.} |
---|
| 45 | \label{fig:tunnel} |
---|
| 46 | \end{figure} |
---|
| 47 | |
---|
| 48 | Three regions have been pre-selected : |
---|
| 49 | the central region and two other regions at about 3 km from |
---|
| 50 | each entrance of the tunnel. |
---|
| 51 | Two different shapes have been considered for the cavities to be excavated: |
---|
| 52 | the ``tunnel shape'' and the cylindrical ``shaft shape''. The main purpose |
---|
| 53 | was to determine the maximum possible size for each of them, |
---|
| 54 | the most sensitive dimension being the width (the so-called ``span'') |
---|
| 55 | of the cavities. |
---|
| 56 | |
---|
| 57 | The very interesting results of this preliminary study |
---|
| 58 | can be summarized as follows : |
---|
| 59 | \begin{enumerate} |
---|
| 60 | \item the best site (rock quality) is found in the middle of the mountain, |
---|
| 61 | at a depth of 4800 mwe; |
---|
| 62 | \item of the two considered shapes : ``tunnel'' and ``shaft'', |
---|
| 63 | the ``shaft shape'' is strongly preferred; |
---|
| 64 | \item cylindrical shafts are feasible up to a diameter $\Phi$ = 65 m |
---|
| 65 | and a full height h = 80 m ($\sim$ 250000 m$^3$); |
---|
| 66 | \item with ``egg shape'' or ``intermediate shape between |
---|
| 67 | cylinder and egg shapes'' the volume of the shafts could be still increased |
---|
| 68 | (see Fig.~\ref{fig:egg}); |
---|
| 69 | \item the estimated cost is $\sim$ 80 M Euro per shaft. |
---|
| 70 | \end{enumerate} |
---|
| 71 | |
---|
| 72 | \begin{figure}[htb] |
---|
| 73 | \centerline{\begin{tabular}{cc} |
---|
| 74 | \epsfig{figure=./figures/egg.eps,width=8.5cm} & |
---|
| 75 | \epsfig{figure=./figures/eggsim.eps,width=5.5cm} |
---|
| 76 | \end{tabular}} |
---|
| 77 | \caption{\it An example of ``egg shape'' simulation, |
---|
| 78 | constrained by the rock parameter measurements made during the road tunnel |
---|
| 79 | and the present laboratory excavation. |
---|
| 80 | The main feasibility criterium is that the significantly perturbated |
---|
| 81 | region around the cavity should not exceed a thickness of about 10 m.} |
---|
| 82 | \label{fig:egg} |
---|
| 83 | \end{figure} |
---|
| 84 | |
---|
| 85 | Fig.~\ref{fig:tunnel} shows a possible configuration for this |
---|
| 86 | large Laboratory, where up to five shafts, of about 250000 m$^3$ each, |
---|
| 87 | can be located between the road tunnel and the railway tunnel, |
---|
| 88 | in the central region of the Fr\'ejus mountain. |
---|
| 89 | |
---|
| 90 | Two possible scenarios for Water \v{C}erenkov detectors are, for instance: |
---|
| 91 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 92 | \item 3 shafts of 250000 m$^3$ each, with a fiducial mass of 440 kton |
---|
| 93 | (``UNO-like'' scenario). |
---|
| 94 | \item 4 shafts of 250000 m$^3$ each, with a fiducial mass of 580 kton. |
---|
| 95 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 96 | In both scenarios one additional shaft could be excavated |
---|
| 97 | for a Liquid Argon and/or a liquid scintillator detector of about |
---|
| 98 | 100 kton total mass. |
---|
| 99 | |
---|
| 100 | The next step will be a Design Study for this Large Laboratory, |
---|
| 101 | performed in close connection with the Design Study of the detectors |
---|
| 102 | and considering the excavation of 3 to 5 ``shafts'' of about 250 000 m$^3$ |
---|
| 103 | each, the associated equipments and the mechanics of the detector modules. |
---|
| 104 | |
---|
| 105 | \subsection{Detector: general considerations} |
---|
| 106 | |
---|
| 107 | The 20 year long successful operation of the |
---|
| 108 | Super-Kamiokande detector has clearly |
---|
| 109 | demonstrated the capabilities and limitations of large water \v{C}erenkov |
---|
| 110 | detectors\,: |
---|
| 111 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 112 | \item This technique is by far the cheapest |
---|
| 113 | and the most stable to instrument a very large detector |
---|
| 114 | mass, as price is dominated by the photodetectors and their associated |
---|
| 115 | electronics (this price growing like the outer surface of the detector), |
---|
| 116 | while the active mass, made of water, is essentially free except for the |
---|
| 117 | purification system |
---|
| 118 | \item These detectors are mainly limited in size by the finite attenuation |
---|
| 119 | length of \v{C}erenkov light, found to be 80 meters at $\lambda = 400$~nm |
---|
| 120 | in Super-Kamiokande, and by the pressure of water on the photomultipliers at |
---|
| 121 | the bottom of the tank, which gives a practical limit of 80~m in height. |
---|
| 122 | At large depths, the maximal size of underground cavities actually limits |
---|
| 123 | relevant dimensions to about 70~m. |
---|
| 124 | \item The detection principle consists in measuring \v{C}erenkov rings produced |
---|
| 125 | by charged particles going faster than light in water. This has several |
---|
| 126 | consequences\,: |
---|
| 127 | \begin{enumerate} |
---|
| 128 | \item neutral particles and charged particles |
---|
| 129 | below \v{C}erenkov threshold are undetectable, so that some energy may |
---|
| 130 | be missing |
---|
| 131 | \item complicated topologies are difficult to handle, and in practice only |
---|
| 132 | events with less than 3 to 5 rings are efficiently reconstructed |
---|
| 133 | \item ring topology, based on their degree of fuzziness, allows to separate |
---|
| 134 | between electromagnetic (e, $\gamma$) rings and ($\mu$, $\pi$) rings |
---|
| 135 | \item the threshold in particle energy depends mainly on photocathode |
---|
| 136 | coverage and also on water purity (due to radioactive backgrounds, such as |
---|
| 137 | radon). Super-Kamiokande has achieved an energy threshold of 5 MeV with |
---|
| 138 | 40\% cathode coverage |
---|
| 139 | \item due to points 1 and 2, water \v{C}erenkov detectors are not suited to |
---|
| 140 | measure high energy neutrino interactions, as more rings and more undetectable |
---|
| 141 | particles are produced. A further limitation comes from the confusion between |
---|
| 142 | single electron or gamma rings and high energy $\pi^0$'s giving 2 overlapping |
---|
| 143 | rings. In practice water \v{C}erenkov's stay excellent neutrino detectors |
---|
| 144 | for energies below 1 (may be 2) GeV, when interactions are mostly quasi-elastic |
---|
| 145 | and the 2 rings from $\pi^0$ well separated. |
---|
| 146 | \end{enumerate} |
---|
| 147 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 148 | |
---|
| 149 | \subsection{Detector design} |
---|
| 150 | |
---|
| 151 | Three detector designs are being carried out worldwide, |
---|
| 152 | namely Hyper-Kamiokande \cite{uno} in Japan, |
---|
| 153 | UNO \cite{hyperk} in the USA and the present project MEMPHYS in Europe. |
---|
| 154 | All of them are rather mild extrapolations of Super-Kamiokande, and rely on the |
---|
| 155 | expertise acquired after 20 years of operation of this detector. |
---|
| 156 | Their main characteristics are summarized in table~\ref{WC:tab-1}. |
---|
| 157 | \begin{sidewaystable} |
---|
| 158 | \centering |
---|
| 159 | % |
---|
| 160 | \begin{tabular}{rccc} |
---|
| 161 | \hline\noalign{\smallskip} |
---|
| 162 | Parameters & \textbf{UNO} (USA) & |
---|
| 163 | \textbf{HyperK} (Japan) & \textbf{MEMPHYS} (Europe)\\ |
---|
| 164 | \noalign{\smallskip}\hline\noalign{\smallskip} |
---|
| 165 | \multicolumn{4}{l}{\textbf{Underground laboratory}} \\ |
---|
| 166 | location & Henderson / Homestake & Tochibora & Fr\'ejus \\ |
---|
| 167 | depth (m.e.w.) & 4500/4800 & |
---|
| 168 | 1500 & 4800 \\ |
---|
| 169 | Long Base Line (km) & $1480\div2760$ / $1280\div2530$ & 290 & 130 \\ |
---|
| 170 | & FermiLab$\div$BNL & JAERI & CERN \\ |
---|
| 171 | \noalign{\smallskip}\hline\noalign{\smallskip} |
---|
| 172 | \multicolumn{4}{l}{\textbf{Detector dimensions}} \\ |
---|
| 173 | type & 3 cubic compartments & 2 twin tunnels & $3\div5$ |
---|
| 174 | shafts\\ |
---|
| 175 | & & 5 compartments & \\ |
---|
| 176 | dimensions & $3\times (60\times60\times60)\mathrm{m}^3$ |
---|
| 177 | & |
---|
| 178 | $2\times 5 \times (\phi=43\mathrm{m} \times L=50\mathrm{m})$ & |
---|
| 179 | $(3\div5)\times(\phi=65\mathrm{m} \times H=65\mathrm{m}) $ \\ |
---|
| 180 | fiducial mass (kt)& 440 & 550 |
---|
| 181 | & $440\div730$\\ |
---|
| 182 | \noalign{\smallskip}\hline\noalign{\smallskip} |
---|
| 183 | \multicolumn{4}{l}{\textbf{Photodetectors}} \\ |
---|
| 184 | type & 20" PMT & 13" H(A)PD & 12" PMT |
---|
| 185 | \\ |
---|
| 186 | number (internal detector) & 57,000 & 20,000 per compartment |
---|
| 187 | & 81,000 per shaft \\ |
---|
| 188 | surface coverage & 40\% (1/3) \& 10\% (2/3) & 40\% & 30\%\ |
---|
| 189 | |
---|
| 190 | \\ |
---|
| 191 | \noalign{\smallskip}\hline |
---|
| 192 | \end{tabular} |
---|
| 193 | % |
---|
| 194 | \caption{\label{WC:tab-1} |
---|
| 195 | \it Some basic parameters of the three Water \v{C}erenkov |
---|
| 196 | detector baseline designs} |
---|
| 197 | \end{sidewaystable} |
---|
| 198 | |
---|
| 199 | These 3 projects aim at a fiducial mass around half a megaton, taking into |
---|
| 200 | account the necessity to have a veto volume on the edge of the detector, 1 to 2 |
---|
| 201 | meters thick, plus a minimal distance of about 2 meters between photodetectors |
---|
| 202 | and interaction vertices, leaving some space for ring development. |
---|
| 203 | The main differences between the 3 projects lie in the geometry |
---|
| 204 | of the cavities (tunnel shape for Hyper-Kamiokande, shafts for MEMPHYS, |
---|
| 205 | intermediate with 3 cubic modules for UNO), and the photocathode coverage, |
---|
| 206 | similar to Super-Kamiokande for Hyper-Kamiokande |
---|
| 207 | and MEMPHYS, while UNO keeps this |
---|
| 208 | coverage on only 1 cubic detector, while the 2 others have only 10\% coverage |
---|
| 209 | for cost reasons. Another important parameter is the rock overburden, similar |
---|
| 210 | for UNO and MEMPHYS (4800~mwe), but smaller for Hyper-Kamiokande (1500~mwe), |
---|
| 211 | which might be a limiting factor for low energy physics, due to spallation |
---|
| 212 | products and fast neutrons produced by cosmic muons, more |
---|
| 213 | abundant by 2 orders of magnitude (see figure~\ref{muonflux}). |
---|
| 214 | |
---|
| 215 | The basic unit for MEMPHYS consists of a cylindrical detector module 65~meters |
---|
| 216 | in diameter and 65~meters high, which can be housed |
---|
| 217 | in a cylindrical cavity with 70~meter diameter and 80 meter height, as proven |
---|
| 218 | by the prestudy. This corresponds to a water mass of 215 kilotons, that is |
---|
| 219 | only 4 times the Super-Kamiokande detector. |
---|
| 220 | Conservatively substracting 2~m for the |
---|
| 221 | outer veto plus 2~m for the fiducial volume, this leaves us with a fiducial |
---|
| 222 | mass of 146 kilotons per module. The baseline design uses 3 modules, giving |
---|
| 223 | a total fiducial mass of 440 kilotons, like UNO, corresponding to factor |
---|
| 224 | 20 increase over Super-Kamiokande (4 modules would give 580 |
---|
| 225 | kiloton fiducial mass). The modular aspect is actually mandatory for |
---|
| 226 | maintenance reasons, so that at least 2 of the 3 modules would be active |
---|
| 227 | at any time, giving 100\% duty cycle for supernova explosions. Furthermore, |
---|
| 228 | it would offer the possibility to add Gadolinium in one of the modules, which |
---|
| 229 | has been advocated to improve diffuse supernova neutrino detection. |
---|
| 230 | We estimate an overall construction time of less than 10 years, and of course |
---|
| 231 | the first module could start physics during the completion of the two other |
---|
| 232 | modules. |
---|
| 233 | |
---|
| 234 | \subsection{Photodetection} |
---|
| 235 | |
---|
| 236 | The baseline photodetector choice is photomultipliers (PMT) as they have |
---|
| 237 | successfuly equipped the previous generation of large water \v{C}erenkov |
---|
| 238 | detectors and many other types of presently running detectors in HEP. The PMT |
---|
| 239 | density should be chosen to allow excellent sensitivity to a broad range |
---|
| 240 | of nucleon decays and neutrino physics while keeping the instrumentation costs |
---|
| 241 | under control. |
---|
| 242 | |
---|
| 243 | Our goal for MEMPHYS is to reach in the whole detector |
---|
| 244 | the same energy threshold as Super-Kamiokande, |
---|
| 245 | that is 5 MeV, important for solar neutrino studies, for the proton decay into |
---|
| 246 | $K^+ \nu$ using the 6~MeV tag from $^{15}$N desexcitation, and also very useful |
---|
| 247 | for SN explosions, since the measurement of the $\nu_{\mu}$ and $\nu_{\tau}$ |
---|
| 248 | fluxes could be achieved using the neutral current excitation of Oxygen. |
---|
| 249 | |
---|
| 250 | Our first approach was to consider 20" Hamamatsu tubes as used by |
---|
| 251 | Super-Kamiokande, but the cost for 40\% coverage becomes prohibitive, as these |
---|
| 252 | tubes are manually blown by specially trained people, which makes them very |
---|
| 253 | expensive. Following a suggestion presented at the NNN05 conference by Photonis |
---|
| 254 | company, we have considered the possibility of using instead 12" PMT's, which |
---|
| 255 | can be automatically manufactured and have better characteristics |
---|
| 256 | compared to 20" tubes\,: quantum efficiency (24\% vs 20\%), collection |
---|
| 257 | efficiency (70\% vs 60\%), risetime (5~ns vs 10~ns), jitter (2.4~ns vs 5.5~ns). |
---|
| 258 | Based on these numbers, 30\% coverage with 12" PMT's would give the same number |
---|
| 259 | of photoelectrons per MeV as a 40\% coverage with 20" tubes. Taking into |
---|
| 260 | account the ratio of photocathodes (615~cm$^2$ vs 1660~cm$^2$), this implies |
---|
| 261 | that going from 20" tubes to twice as many 12" tubes will give the same |
---|
| 262 | detected light, with a bonus on time resolution and on pixel locations. If the dark |
---|
| 263 | current of better photocathodes does not increase dramatically the trigger rate, |
---|
| 264 | we can expect MEMPHYS performances be at least as good as Super-Kamiokande. |
---|
| 265 | A GEANT4 based Monte Carlo is under development to quantify the effective |
---|
| 266 | gain. Pricewise, each 20" PMT costing 2500 Euros |
---|
| 267 | is replaced by 2 12" PMT's costing 800 Euros each. |
---|
| 268 | The only caveat is to make sure that the savings on PMT's are not |
---|
| 269 | cancelled by the doubling of electronic channels. An R\&D on electronics |
---|
| 270 | integration is presently underway (see Sec. \ref{sec:photo}). |
---|
| 271 | |
---|
| 272 | \subsection{Photomultiplier tests} |
---|
| 273 | |
---|
| 274 | A joint R\&D program between Photonis company and French laboratories has been |
---|
| 275 | launched to test the quality of the 12" PMTs in the foreseen conditions of |
---|
| 276 | deep water depth, and to make a realistic |
---|
| 277 | market model for the production of about 250,000 PMTs that would be necessary |
---|
| 278 | to get the 30\% geometrical coverage. |
---|
| 279 | |
---|
| 280 | In parallel, studies on new photo-sensors have been launched. |
---|
| 281 | The aim is to reduce cost, while improving production rate and performance, as |
---|
| 282 | it is essential |
---|
| 283 | to achieve the long term stability and reliability which is proven for PMTs. |
---|
| 284 | Hybrid photosensors (HPD) could be a solution\,: |
---|
| 285 | the principle has been proven by ICRR and Hamamatsu with a 5" HPD prototype. |
---|
| 286 | Successful results from tests of an 13" |
---|
| 287 | prototype operated with 12 kV are now available, |
---|
| 288 | showing a $3 \cdot 10^4$ gain, good single photon sensitivity, |
---|
| 289 | 0.8 ns time resolution and a satisfactory gain and |
---|
| 290 | timing uniformity over the photo-cathode area. |
---|
| 291 | The development of HPD has also been initiated in Europe, |
---|
| 292 | in collaboration with Photonis. |
---|
| 293 | |
---|