Index: /Selma/PARISROC/parisroc-jinst.tex
===================================================================
--- /Selma/PARISROC/parisroc-jinst.tex	(revision 482)
+++ /Selma/PARISROC/parisroc-jinst.tex	(revision 483)
@@ -42,5 +42,5 @@
 PARISROC is a complete read
 out chip, in AMS SiGe 0.35 \begin{math}\mu{}\end{math}m technology
-\cite{ref1}
+\cite{Genolini:2008uc}
 %[1]
 , for photomultipliers array. It allows triggerless acquisition for
@@ -49,5 +49,5 @@
 PMm2: "`Innovative electronics for photodetectors array
 used in High Energy Physics and Astroparticles"'
-\cite{ref2}
+\cite{PMm2Site:2006}
 %[2]
 (ref.ANR-06-BLAN-0186). The ASIC integrates 16 independent and auto
@@ -77,5 +77,5 @@
 The PMm2 project: "`Innovative electronics for
 photodetectors array used in High Energy Physics and
-Astroparticles"' \cite{ref2}
+Astroparticles"' \cite{PMm2Site:2006}
 %[2]
 proposes to segment the large surface of photodetection in macro
@@ -88,5 +88,5 @@
 data. The micro-electronics group's (OMEGA from the LAL at Orsay)
 purpose is the front-end electronics conception and
-realization. This R\&D \cite{ref2}
+realization. This R\&D \cite{PMm2Site:2006}
 %[2]
 involves three French laboratories (LAL Orsay, LAPP Annecy, IPN
@@ -101,10 +101,9 @@
 
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
-\begin{center}
-\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=10cm]{img1.jpg}
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth]{img1.jpg}
 \caption{Principal of PMm2 proposal for megaton scale Cerenkov water
 tank.}
 \label{fig:1}
-\end{center}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -113,5 +112,5 @@
 the next generation neutrino experiments will require a bigger surface
 of photo detection and thus more photomultipliers. As a consequence the
-total cost has an important relief \cite{ref1}.
+total cost has an important relief \cite{Genolini:2008uc}.
 The project proposes to use 12" PMts with an improved cost ( by factor of 1.6 in comparison to 20 ") per unit of surface area and detected p.e (cost/QE*CE). This is mainly due to the different industrial fabrication of the PMTs, the better photon detection efficiency and a better reliability.
 The reduced costs are, also, due to:
@@ -134,11 +133,11 @@
 PARISROC can be perfectly integrated in a surface scheme. 
 
-\begin{center}
-\begin{figure}[!!htbp]
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img2.jpg}
+\begin{figure}[!htbp]
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img2.jpg}
 \caption{Principle of the PMm2 project.}
 \label{fig:2}
 \end{figure}
-\end{center}
+
 
 \section{PARISROC architecture}
@@ -179,11 +178,10 @@
 common digital part (\refFig{fig:3}).
 
-\begin{center}
-\begin{figure}[!htbp]
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img3.jpg}
+\begin{figure}[!htbp]
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img3.jpg}
 \caption{PARISROC global schematic.}
 \label{fig:3}
 \end{figure}
-\end{center}
 
 Each analog channel is made of a low noise preamplifier with variable and adjustable gain.  
@@ -218,22 +216,20 @@
 threshold to convert the charge and the fine time. In addition a bandgap bloc provides all voltage references.
 
-\begin{center}
-\begin{figure}[!htbp]
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img4.jpg}
+\begin{figure}[!htbp]
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img4.jpg}
 \caption{PARISROC Layout.}
 \label{fig:4}
 \end{figure}
-\end{center}
 
 \refFig{fig:5} represents, in a schematic way, the detail of one channel analogue
 part.
 
-\begin{center}
-\begin{figure}[!htbp]
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img5.jpg}
+\begin{figure}[!htbp]
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img5.jpg}
 \caption{PARISROC one channel analogue part schematic.}
 \label{fig:5}
 \end{figure}
-\end{center}
 
 
@@ -251,11 +247,10 @@
 gain dispersion due to a use of a common HV.
 
-\begin{center}
 \begin{figure}[!htb]
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img6.jpg}
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img6.jpg}
 	\caption{PARISROC preamplifier schematic.}
 	\label{fig:6}
 \end{figure}
-\end{center}
 
 The preamplifier is designed as a voltage
@@ -283,6 +278,6 @@
 input signal and different preamplifier gain (right panel).
 
-\begin{center}
-\begin{figure}[!htbp]
+\begin{figure}[!htbp]
+\centering
 \begin{tabular}{rl}
 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img7a.jpg} & 
@@ -295,5 +290,4 @@
 	\label{fig:7}
 \end{figure}
-\end{center}
 
 The input signal, used in simulation, is a triangle signal with 4.5~ns
@@ -303,11 +297,10 @@
 to 300 photo-electrons when the PM gain is $10^{6}$.
 
-\begin{center}
-\begin{figure}[!htbp]
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img8.jpg}
+\begin{figure}[!htbp]
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img8.jpg}
 \caption{Simulation input signal.}
 \label{fig:8}
 \end{figure}
-\end{center}
 
 The \refFig{fig:9} displays the input dynamic range allowed to the preamplifier
@@ -315,11 +308,10 @@
 gains and shows a good linearity (better than $\pm 1\%$).
 
-\begin{center}
-\begin{figure}[!htbp]
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img9.jpg}
+\begin{figure}[!htbp]
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img9.jpg}
 \caption{Preamplifier linearity.}
 \label{fig:9}
 \end{figure}
-\end{center}
 
 
@@ -345,12 +337,11 @@
 \refTab{tab:2} summarizes the results obtained.
 
-\begin{center}
-\begin{figure}[!htbp]
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img10.jpg}
+\begin{figure}[!htbp]
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img10.jpg}
 \caption{Preamplifier noise simulation; $G_{pa}=8$; $C_{in}=4$~pF and
 $C_{f}=0.5$~pF.}
-\end{figure}
 \label{fig:10}
-\end{center}
+\end{figure}
 
 \begin{table}
@@ -379,5 +370,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img11.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img11.jpg}
 \caption{Fast shaper schematics.}
 \label{fig:11}
@@ -448,5 +439,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img14.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img14.jpg}
 \caption{SCA (switched capacitor array) scheme.}
 \label{fig:14}
@@ -462,5 +453,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img15.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img15.jpg}
 \caption{Operation of T\&H cell.}
 \label{fig:15}
@@ -528,5 +519,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img17.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img17.jpg}
 \caption{Slow shaper linearity simulation.}
 \label{fig:17}
@@ -555,5 +546,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img18.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img18.jpg}
 \caption{Slow shaper \& SCA simulation.}
 \label{fig:18}
@@ -592,5 +583,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img20.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img20.jpg}
 \caption{TDC Ramp.}
 \label{fig:20}
@@ -604,5 +595,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img21.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img21.jpg}
 \caption{TDC Ramp scheme.}
 \label{fig:21}
@@ -611,5 +602,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img22.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img22.jpg}
 \caption{TDC Ramp simulation.}
 \label{fig:22}
@@ -630,5 +621,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img23.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img23.jpg}
 \caption{ADC ramp schematic.}
 \label{fig:23}
@@ -667,5 +658,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img24.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img24.jpg}
 \caption{Block diagram of the digital part.}
 \label{fig:24}
@@ -682,5 +673,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img25.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img25.jpg}
 \caption{Top manager sequence.}
 \label{fig:25}
@@ -699,5 +690,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img26.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img26.jpg}
 \caption{SCA analogue voltage}
 \label{fig:26}
@@ -740,5 +731,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img27.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img27.jpg}
 \caption{Test Board.}
 \label{fig:27}
@@ -755,5 +746,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img28.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img28.jpg}
 \caption{Test Bench.}
 \label{fig:28}
@@ -768,5 +759,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img29.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img29.jpg}
 %%%% NOT USED \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img34.jpg}
 \caption{Input signals}
@@ -798,7 +789,7 @@
 \centering
 \begin{tabular}{c}
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img30a.jpg}\\
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img30b.jpg}\\
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img30c.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img30a.jpg}\\
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img30b.jpg}\\
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img30c.jpg}
 \end{tabular}
 \caption{DC uniformity.}
@@ -871,5 +862,5 @@
 \centering
 		\begin{tabular}{rl}
-			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img32a.jpg}
+			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img32a.jpg}&
 			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img32b.jpg}
 		\end{tabular}
@@ -902,5 +893,5 @@
 	\centering
 		\begin{tabular}{rl}
-			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img33a.jpg}
+			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img33a.jpg}&
 			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img33b.jpg}
 		\end{tabular}
@@ -929,5 +920,5 @@
 linearity. The output voltage in function of the input injected charge
 is plotted for the different analogue signals. \refFig{fig:34} gives few examples for
-the preamplifier at different gains. \refTab{11} summarizes the fit
+the preamplifier at different gains. \refTab{tab:11} summarizes the fit
 results of these linearities. Good linearity performances are shown by
 residuals (better than $\pm 2~\%$) value but for a
@@ -937,7 +928,7 @@
 \centering
 		\begin{tabular}{c}
-			\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img34a.jpg}
-			\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img34b.jpg}
-			\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img34c.jpg}
+			\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img34a.jpg}\\
+			\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img34b.jpg}\\
+			\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img34c.jpg}
 		\end{tabular}
 \caption{Preamplifier linearity for different gains.}
@@ -967,5 +958,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img35.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img35.jpg}
 \caption{Slow shaper linearity; $RC =50$~ns and $G_{pa}=8$.}
 \label{fig:35}
@@ -978,5 +969,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img36.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img36.jpg}
 \caption{Fast shaper linearity up to 10~pe.}
 \label{fig:36}
@@ -990,5 +981,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img37.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img37.jpg}
 \caption{Preamplifier linearity vs feedback capacitor value.}
 \label{fig:37}
@@ -1004,5 +995,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img38.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img38.jpg}
 \caption{Gain uniformity for $G_{pa}=8, 4, 2$.}
 \label{fig:38}
@@ -1040,5 +1031,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img40.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img40.jpg}
 \caption{Pedestal S-curves for channel 1 to 16.}
 \label{fig:40}
@@ -1073,5 +1064,5 @@
 \centering
 		\begin{tabular}{rl}
-			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img42a.jpg}
+			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img42a.jpg}&
 			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img42b.jpg}
 		\end{tabular}
@@ -1083,5 +1074,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img43.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img43.jpg}
 \caption{Threshold vs injected charge up to 500~fC. It is shown the 1~p.e threshold for a PMT gain of $10^6$.}
 \label{fig:43}
@@ -1094,5 +1085,6 @@
 
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img44.jpg}
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img44.jpg}
 \caption{Trigger coupling signal.}
 \label{fig:44}
@@ -1119,5 +1111,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img45.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img45.jpg}
 \caption{ADC measurements with DC input 1.45~V (middle scale).}
 \label{fig:45}
@@ -1132,5 +1124,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img46.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img46.jpg}
 \caption{10  bits ADC transfer function vs input charge.}
 \label{fig:46}
@@ -1178,7 +1170,7 @@
 \centering
 		\begin{tabular}{c}
-			\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img48a.jpg}\\
-			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img48b.jpg}\\
-			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img48c.jpg}
+			\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img48a.jpg}\\
+			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth]{img48b.jpg}\\
+			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth]{img48c.jpg}
 		\end{tabular}
 \caption{12, 10, 8 bit ADC linearity.}
@@ -1193,5 +1185,5 @@
 	\centering
 		\begin{tabular}{rl}
-			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img49a.jpg}
+			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img49a.jpg}&
 			\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img49b.jpg}
 		\end{tabular}
@@ -1229,5 +1221,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img50.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img50.jpg}
 \caption{10 bit ADC linearity.}
 \label{fig:50}
@@ -1240,5 +1232,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img51.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img51.jpg}
 \caption{8 bit ADC linearity.}
 \label{fig:51}
@@ -1251,5 +1243,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img52.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img52.jpg}
 \caption{12 bit ADC linearity.}
 \label{fig:52}
@@ -1265,5 +1257,5 @@
 \begin{figure}[!htbp]
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img53.jpg}
+\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img53.jpg}
 \caption{TO BE COMPLETED}
 \label{fig:53}
