= Quattor Monthly Meeting - 6/5/10 = [[TracNav]] [[TOC(inline)]] [http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=91800 Agenda] == Progress since last meeting == COST project (Michel) * Result of first selection stage expected May 11 (next week) SPMA (Victor) * Work in progress, no performance gain so far Monitoring templates (David) * Difficulties with LAL SVN server prevented update of TCD templates (`standard/monitoring/nagios`) * Current `standard/monitoring/nagios` content can be safely replaced by current TCD templates as they are not used by anybody else as standard templates * Ronald committed NIKHEF templates into SVN in a separate branch: `nagios` (at the same level as `trunk`) panc 8.4 (Cal) * Not yet released... but coming soon MS developments into SVN (Nick) * Still waiting feedback from legal people about contraints and possibilities * QRD now in a state where it could be released Best practicies for components (Luis) * Luis agreed on the principle, need to work out the details... Contact with YUM developers (Michel) * Not yet done Wiki migration (Cal) * MediaWiki backuped and disabled * Access : for problem logging with certificates, drop an email to Michel/Guillaume SVN server at LAL : certificate updated * Encryption used by previous CA now considered weak (MD5) == Priorities/actions for next month == Maven evaluation as a replacement for quattor build tools (Cal) QWG wiki : review existing contents (Andrea) * additionally, identify old URLs that may require a redirect SPMA (Victor) * Focus on multiple arch support first Monitoring templates: review differences between TCD and NIKHEF and define a merge strategy MS developments into SVN (Nick/Michel) Best practicies for components: discuss how and timeline with Luis Contact with YUM developers (Michel) * Not a short term action anyway... == Conclusions == Monthly meeting first Thursday of every month at 2 pm CET. * Check [http://indico.cern.ch/categoryDisplay.py?categId=2921 Indico] for agendas: all meeting created until Sept. * Next meeting: June 3 EVO experience a bit difficult today: let try to give it another chance * I realize after the meeting I was connected in wireless in a room with a weak signal: that may explain the bad sound qualitfy from LAL. Apologies. (Michel) * Andrea expressed is preference for EVO, despite the difficult experience today