Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Meetings/Workshops/20100317


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 18, 2010, 5:16:49 PM (14 years ago)
Author:
/O=GRID-FR/C=FR/O=CNRS/OU=LAL/CN=Michel Jouvin
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Meetings/Workshops/20100317

    v1 v1  
     1= Quattor Workshop - 17-19/3/10 - Thessaloniki =
     2[[TracNav]]
     3
     4[[TOC(inline)]]
     5
     6[http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=84432#20100317 Agenda].
     7
     8== Site Reports ==
     9
     10=== LAL ===
     11
     12See slides.
     13
     14=== MS ===
     15
     16Configuration changes:
     17 * Still one configuration server
     18 * 2 set of boot servers (Europe, US)
     19 * 20K managed machines (+5K)
     20 * Virtual machines with ESX: 1200 ESX server, 1700 managed machines
     21 * AII rebuild time still 3h
     22 * Compile time increased from 10 to 18 minutes
     23   * Using MS-specific version of 8.2.9
     24 * 8 people involved in template development maintenance (+2)
     25 * LEMON used: 2x2 servers
     26 
     27Issues:
     28 * No code submissions recently: legal issues with SF...
     29 * aqd scalaibility: priority for next year
     30 * Pending open-source:
     31   * AII, CCM patches: in prod at MS
     32   * FUSE interface to configuration browsing: ready for distribution
     33   * Aquilon: RAL interested, still a significant MS-dependencies
     34   
     35
     36=== AUTH ===
     37
     38Migration from cfg/local to SCDB sites still in progress
     39
     40Included monitoring information at profiles
     41
     42Attempt to use Quattor as a central DB for all assets (KVM, StorageArrays...)
     43 * Implemented as a separate cluster group
     44 
     45SCDB clusters by machine criticality
     46
     47Xen configuration now based on QWG with a few developments
     48 * Removed host dependency on guests
     49 * Trying to remove the use of DHCP
     50 
     51Templates for new machine types
     52 * Message broker, in production at AUTH
     53 * egee-NAGIOS/egee-SNAGIOS: work in progress, not based on previous Nagios templates from QWG
     54 
     55QAD: Nagios interface almost completed
     56 
     57JRuby added to SCDB to add task written in Ruby
     58 * Used for QAD integration
     59 
     60Issue: sync with QWG, how other sites are doing?
     61
     62=== CERN ===
     63
     64''Note: report about Quattor in computing center only.''
     65
     66CDB 2.2.5 and panc 8.2.11: 10K machines
     67 * panc 8.3.0 tested
     68 
     69New development: Django-based search tool for CDBSQL
     70 * Using sqlalchemy: Oracle independent
     71 
     72Test of SCDB: work done by Daniel with the help of Luis
     73 * Test done with one profile and the CERN template structure
     74 * Observations:
     75   * profile location is a big change for CERN
     76   * Decoupling of commit and deploy may lead to potential problems
     77   * SVN ACLs are only at the directory level: having them at the file level is an advantage in CDB
     78   * +: build-in ACLs, local panc compilation giving access to log files
     79   
     80RFE: pkg_add/pkg_repl based on date to ensure people are not installing obsolete version. Is it feasible?
     81
     82Can we agree on a policy for announcements of new components? Exact rules for using quattor-discuss rather than quattor-grid? Do we really need 2 lists?
     83
     84
     85=== NIKHEF ===
     86
     875 clusters, 500 managed machines
     88 * 350 clones
     89 * SCDB 2.3.1 + local changes
     90   * panc 8.2.8
     91 * Compilation time: ~30s
     92 
     936 people involved in Quattor maintenance (4 active)
     94
     95Virtualization: 13 hosts, 48 guests
     96
     97Nagios: 1 master, 3 slaves
     98
     99Refactoring of templates for easier usage: not using QWG
     100 * VO configuration, VOMS
     101 * Batch system access control, VOViews
     102 * User banning
     103
     104Virtualization: currently not used with grid clusters, investigating KVM
     105
     106=== Grid Ireland ===
     107
     10818 sites, some have expanded.
     109
     110SCDB with bzr and Git clients and an old version of QWG (r4921)
     111 * Not up-to-date in particular with errata and VO config
     112 
     113=== RAL ===
     114
     11590% of T1 Quattor managed. T1 fully committed to Quattor.
     116 * Mostly WNs (700 already, 400+ soon)
     117 * Also other machine types: bdii, vobox, ....
     118 * Disk servers: OS + all package management operations, CASTOR config still relying on Puppet
     119 * Nagios servers: OS only
     120 
     1219 sysadmins involved + 6 more coming
     122
     123SINDES on the point of deployment to ease server certificates handling.
     124
     125Ready to start experimenting with Aquilon
     126
     127Using SCDB+QWG (up-to-date with standard templates)
     128 * Happy with performances: 4 minutes for a full compile, without profile cloning
     129 * Would like to slim down RPM list used by various machine types. Is anyone else interested?
     130
     131Very positive with Quattor so far
     132 * Much more consistent
     133 * Batch service much easier to manage
     134 * Errata deployment much easier
     135 * Much more agile: easier to deploy new versions
     136 
     137
     138=== CERN LHCb Online Farm ===
     139
     140Online computing
     141 * Event filtering farm: currently 700 nodes, 500 to 1000 to be added in the future
     142   * Diskless systems
     143 * Credit card PCs
     144 * Various control PCs and infrastructure nodes (Web servers, DNS, ....)
     145 * Also some Windows nodes (120) but mainly running Linux SLC4/SLC5/RHEL5
     146 
     147Linux machines managed by Quattor
     148 * Original setup done in 2006 with CDB/panc v6/aii v1
     149   * SWrep replaced by scripts
     150   * ViewVC web interface to templates and XM files
     151   * Problems with Krb authentication in CDB and the fact author of commit is always Apache
     152 * Decided to give a try to SCDB... see presentation
     153 
     154Maintainer of ncm-diskless_server and ncm-pvss
     155 * Also developped ncm-checklines as an improved ncm-filecopy
     156
     157Plans for the future:
     158 * Finish move to SCDB
     159 * Cleanup of tempates
     160 * Update/rewrite the 2 components maintained as part of this use + ncm-network
     161   * Several issues with ncm-network: see presentation tomorrow
     162   
     163Some extensions made on Quattor schema
     164 * Additions to /system
     165 * /hardware/ipmi
     166 
     167=== LAPP ===
     168
     1695 SCDB clusters
     170 * 1 machine acting both as SVN and SCDB server, still running SL4
     171 
     17210 Gb/s support: with Chelsio interfaces, found a way to do PXE
     173 * No more need to use 1 Gb/s for Quattor (PXE) boot
     174 
     175Install and configuration of GPFS through Quattor
     176 * Strongly depending of kernel and require to build RPM for each new version of the kernel
     177 * Unfortunatly hard to make generic, thus not contributed to standard templates
     178 
     179
     180=== CNAF ===
     181
     182Very positive after the move to SCDB, despite a few problems
     183 * Error caused by users who commit before compiling, planning a wrapper
     184 
     1853900 machines managed.
     186
     187Working on improving QWG errata management.
     188
     189Main versions deployed
     190 * SL5 (no longer SLC)
     191 * gLite 3.2
     192 * Grid services configured with YAIM
     193 
     194Virutalization
     195 * Using KVM, phasing out Xen
     196 * No connection between hypervisor and VMs in templates: not clear we want to do it
     197  * Hypervisors and VMs managed by Quattor
     198 
     199Issue: complexity is increasing a lot
     200 * Bug tracking is very difficult
     201 
     202 
     203== Developments ==
     204
     205=== Pan Compiler - C. Loomis ===
     206
     207v8.2 in production: only serious bug will be fixed
     208
     209v8.3 (development version): 8.3.1 is a release candidate
     210 * Dependency file format change, annotation syntax
     211 * Will become 8.4.0 when production version is released
     212 
     213v9 planned before next workshop
     214 * Will remove support for all deprecated syntax/features
     215   * See previous list
     216 * Will require .pan instead of .tpl
     217   * 8.4 will support both
     218   * Issue: CVS history cannot track renames...
     219   * Would probably be easier to  add an option to change the default extension to avoid the penalty of trying both for every template
     220   
     221panc release management moved from ant to maven
     222
     223Current work:
     224 * Allows sources from non-file locations (eg https)
     225 * Will enable an XML-based syntax imported as a structure template
     226
     227Code refactoring:
     228 * clean up, internationalization
     229 * Make AST more accessible (e.g. editors, code formatters...)
     230 * Easier tight control by external tools (e.g. debugger)
     231 
     232Annotations: open the path for automatic documentation generation
     233 * Need to agree on tags used
     234 
     235Another issue: auto-escaping of nlist keys
     236 * Possible to look at it but potentially a huge work to take advantage of it
     237 
     238=== QWG Update - M. Jouvin ===
     239
     240See slides.
     241
     242=== SCDB Update - M. Jouvin ===
     243
     244See slides.
     245
     246=== Diskless Servers Support - L. Barda ===
     247
     248For LHCb online farm
     249 * Filtering tasks can be done in memory, disk not used
     250 * Credit-card PC have no disks; still SLC4, i386
     251 
     252Initial diskless support in Quattor started in 2005 and taken over by LHCb end of 2007.
     253 * Read-only NFS shared root filesystem configured on the server and copied to the diskless server at the end of kickstart
     254 * RW files for each client in a specific file system (`/.snapshot`) remounted with -bind on the diskless server
     255 * 2 templates to describe a node configuration
     256   * Proto node: shared root FS content, main part of the configuration
     257   * Real node: node-specifc configuration
     258   
     259`ncm-diskless_server` is used to generate the boot image, manage DHCP/PXE for the managed systems, configure the `ccm.conf` on the node-specific file system.
     260
     261Current status
     262 * In production for several years
     263 * Moved farm from SLC4 32-bit to SLC5 64-bit: was pretty easy
     264 * A student should work on SLC5 i386 for CCPC
     265 
     266Issues with the current solution
     267 * Very large mount table on nodes
     268 * Issues when modifying a RW file on a RO file system
     269 * List of RH RW files is too large
     270 * Lack of debug info in system-config-netboot used to generate images and initrd generation is not flexible enough
     271 * Shared root file system can only be a copy of the server file system
     272
     273Plan is to rewrite `ncm-diskless_server` and use UnionFS to replace the NFS mounts and bind tricks.
     274
     275Several issues with `ncm-network` too, in particular inappropriate restart of the network breaking the NFS access. Will start a rewrite (`ncm-network_NG`)
     276 * Should separate each part of the configuration: interfaces, routes, bonding.... Code restructuring.
     277 * Should use network utils to modifiy the running system
     278 * Modify sysconfig files for persistent modifications
     279 
     280Try to interact with the community during the design phase to ensure it could be used at some points in replacement of the current `ncm-network`.
     281
     282== Migration to SCDB at CERN LHCb Online - L. Barda ==
     283
     284Motivations:
     285 * Wanted to have real names in commits
     286 * CVS too much hidden in CDB: no more conflict resolution
     287 * CDB2SQL too heavy
     288 
     289SCDB installation using standard documentation, but no QWG. A few modified components:
     290 * LDAP authentication to SVN
     291   * Next Apache will allow subgroups
     292   * svnperms.py to restrict who can do commits
     293 * DHCPD config / aii-dhcp
     294 * quattor.build.xml: no cluster used, profiles located in /profiles/*
     295   * New target added
     296 * Post-commit: added the ability to send an email before running post-commit.py
     297 * build-tag.py run under Apache rather than root without sudo or ssh
     298   * Also added the ability to run quatview as part of build-tag.py (new section in config file)
     299
     300Also AII v1 to v2 migration.
     301
     302Special use case: allow sub-detector people to change their CCPC Mac address
     303 * Allow them to commit only in the subfolder corresponding to their CCPC and make a deploy
     304 * Rely on svnperms.py precommit hook to restrict their right to commit
     305 
     306Currently a test instance, in production soon.
     307
     308
     309== Monitoring ==
     310
     311=== NCG-Monitoring and Quattor - R. Starink ===
     312
     313Quattor implementation at NIKHEF based on `standard/monitoring/quattor` but a lot have changed and merge is challenging.
     314 * Changes both in QWG and NIKHEF templates
     315 
     316Enhancement at NIKHEF:
     317 * Hierarchy of Nagios servers
     318   * Slaves schedule probes and return result to master through passive checks. Uses `ncm-nsca` on master+slaves
     319   * Master monitors slaves with active checks
     320   * Master and slaves with the same host/service definition but with slightly different parameters. Quattor helps to keep things consistency.
     321   * Master is the only one to run Apache: configured with `ncm-filecopy`
     322 * pnp4nagios: RRD-based graphs (like Ganglia) integrated with Nagios, usable with any probe
     323 * Service checks: generic checks + grid-specific ones (DPM, WMS, Torque, MAUI...)
     324 
     325Grid monitoring: wanted to enable NCG-based grid monitoring solution for site
     326 * SAM test results
     327 * Local grid checks
     328 * Ideally entirely Quattor-managed but potential conflict: NCG implements a dynamic detection of tests to run where Quattor describes tests in a static configuration
     329   * NCG: risk (happened!) of Nagios killed by a dynamic update of the configuration
     330 * Requirements: co-exist with existing Quattor+Nagios setup, no gLite on Nagios server
     331   * Incompatibilities fed back to developers
     332   
     333Grid monitoring layout:
     334 * Master werver can either submit grid tests directly or through a separated gLite UI
     335 * NCG used to generate Nagios configuration but not to enable/configure Apache, sudo... (done by Quattor)
     336   * Files generated by NCG included as `cfg_file` in `ncm-nagios`
     337   * Potential conflict between Quattor config and NCG config (duplicated hosts...) preventing Nagios to start
     338 * Master has a check (delivered by NCG) to push checks generated on master on the gLite UI
     339
     340Status
     341 * Started early in pre-OAT times where many manual steps were required
     342 * Deployed recently the Jan2010 release and now configuration almost fully automated
     343   * Many perl-xxx dependencies: better to use `checkdeps`
     344 * Setup is not straightforward: NCG is still work in progress
     345 * Not completely happy with NGC-magic but aternative is to describe services in Quattor configuration. Is it maintainable?
     346 
     347=== Monitoring based on OAT Work - C. Triantafillidys ===
     348
     349See slides.
     350
     351Prototype not ready for distribution, based on QAD and NCG
     352 * Both still under developments
     353 * QAD used as a management interface to add MetricSets and select nodes which they are applied to based on `/monitoring/features`.
     354 
     355
     356=== NagiosBox for Biomed - M. Jouvin ===
     357
     358See slides.
     359   
     360
     361=== Monitoring Discussion ===
     362
     363TCD still using QWG templates but short of manpower.
     364 * TCD should update QWG trunk so that we can understand/assess difference with NIKHEF
     365 * QWG templates for describing monitoring configuration for local resources
     366 * Must allow AUTH usage pattern where all the configuration of Nagios is done outside Quattor (through QAD)
     367 * RAL will not necessarily use it but could provide feedback on what is done/planned in QWG templates
     368 
     369Grid service monitoring will try to rely on NCG as much as possible
     370 * Need input from AUTH about possible usage patterns of NCG API, how to integrate it in components...
     371
     372First step: 2 wiki pages describing NIKHEF configuration and NCG potential
     373 * Location to be discussed later
     374 
     375Should plan a Nagios node in future test cluster.
     376
     377
     378== StratusLab - C. Loomis ==
     379
     380Goal: enhancing grid infrastructure with virtualization and cloud technologies by incorporating could innovation into existing grid infrastructures
     381 * Simplify and optimize its use and operation
     382 * Enhance existing computing infrastructure with "Iaas"
     383 * Grid services will remain the glue among distributed resources
     384 * Possibility to scale out to commercial clouds
     385 * Deliver an open cloud API (à la Amazon EC2) to enable community services to take advantage of cloud resources
     386 
     387StratusLab aims to deliver a toolkit that can be easily installed by existing sites.
     388 * All the software produced will be openSource (exact license to be decided)
     389
     390Interaction with Quattor community
     391 * Several partners member of Quattor community: TCD, LAL
     392 * Major goal is to make the life of sysadmins easier: need to ensure that it is easy to install and configure with automated tools
     393 * Want to leverage Quattor community's expertise with grid deployment: don't want to reinvent the wheel..
     394 * Would like to use Quattor to build appliance configurations
     395 
     396 
     397Project should start beginning of June.
     398 * Still in negociation
     399
     400== SF Migration and Build Tools - C. Loomis ==
     401
     402Current situation
     403 * Need to converge to using tools on SF and having a sustainable set of build tools
     404 * Was planned to be done within QUEST and now we need to move forward ourselves
     405 * Need to have concrete relaistic plans
     406 * Build tools unmaintained(able) since ME left
     407 
     408Current tools:
     409 * Wiki
     410   * MediaWiki on SF
     411   * Trac on SF enabled but not used
     412   * Trac@lal: used extensively for QWG documentation
     413 * SVN: SF for Quattor core, QWG for QWG+SCDB
     414 * Bug/feature tracking
     415   * SF: Pan compiler only (based on Bugzilla, working well)
     416   * Trac@LAL: QWG todo list
     417   * Savanah@CERN: main place for user bugs
     418   
     419Build tools:
     420 * Current set of tools very complex and basically unmaintainable
     421 * Attempt with Ant but not clear there is a real gain as Ant config file is rather complex
     422 * Maven solution may be possible: many attractive features (dependency management, multi-level project configuration, RPM packaging), more language neutral than Ant
     423   * Willing to do limited test but will need help from others
     424 
     425Wiki future
     426 * Trac on SF is lacking to many features (plugins) to allow an easy migration from Trac@LAL
     427 * A temporary option could be to move current MediaWiki content to Trac@LAL until we have a usable Trac@SF
     428   * Then we could migrate with export/import of Trac DB
     429   * We gain some time for SF to install the same Trac version as LAL
     430 * Agreed but import of MediaWiki contents to Trac@LAL must be the occasion of restructuring current contents to be more generic and ready for import to SF
     431 
     432SVN future
     433 * Move SCDB to SF asap (and other generic tools if any)
     434   * QWG part kept at LAL temporarily
     435
     436Bug/feature tracking
     437 * Current SF bug tracking is functional and fairly usable, only missing bit is ability to link to SVN
     438 * Moving all bug tracking of to SF would have the benefit to remove one of many places where users have to go
     439 * Agreement to close Savanah
     440   * Review exact requirements and issues in monthly meetings
     441   * Configure SF with appropriate tickets
     442   * Communicate with the community
     443   * Implement the change. Target: 2-3 months
     444   
     445Mailing list
     446 * quattor-grid: only QWG-related stuff
     447 * quattor-discuss: everything related to core components, including NCM components
     448 * quattor-nagios: discussion to Nagios bit and bytes (development list)
     449 * Announcements: evaluate SF announcement features as they are more appropriate than a mailing list
     450
     451Build tools:
     452 * Cal ready to do a mini test with Maaven
     453 * Should try to remove the too many externals
     454 
     455
     456
     457== Quattor Future ==
     458
     459Agreement on a monthly meeting.
     460 * Doodle to find the convenient time slot (if possible allow participation from US but not a strong requirement)
     461 * Between 1 and 2h
     462 * Possible facility: Dutch, BELNET, IN2P3
     463   * Do a test asap: end of next week/beginning of the week after
     464 * First meeting: first week of April
     465 * ~10 people ready to participate
     466 
     467Work plan
     468 * Panc debugger: not in the short term
     469 * Panc editor: try to find a student who could do the work to have something basic but complete
     470   * Not scheduled until we find one
     471 * Component tooling + ability to run non-Perl components
     472   * Need to understand costs and benefits
     473   * Concentrate on a review of what this involves
     474   * Ask Nick; first goal may be to produce a list of issues as a FAQ (reasons why it is not possible)
     475 * Support for package managers other than RPM
     476   * SPMA replacement on other platforms
     477   * May also impact the build tools (ability to package Quattor as something else than RPM)
     478   * Not first priority for many sites but support for YUM/APT may be valuable for many sites
     479   * CERN had plans to use YUM of SPMA
     480   * Concentrate first on a review of what is exactly involved, potential benefits, minimum YUM version to use, understand APT and YUM differences
     481 * Aquilon integration: RAL will work on this anyway and expect progress before next workshop
     482   * Will depend a little bit on MS availability to help: MS cannot commit to spend much time but agrees to help
     483   * Ian taking this in charge but limited to getting it usable at RAL
     484 * IPv6: not a short-term requirement but needs to be done
     485   * NIKHEF could commit to try to install a test quattor server that will use IPv6 and check what is working/not working
     486   * Some expertise available in EGEE3 and several NRENs
     487   * Make a clear list of what are the changed required
     488 * Hooks for interoperation with management frameworks
     489 * Code review and best-practices
     490   * Define best-practices and recommended API for components and rewrite a documentation for developping components on this (Luis)
     491 * Set up of build and test infrastructure
     492   * Cal volunteers for the build tools and for adding unit tests
     493   * Do a review of the existing build system at LAPP and make proposal to have it more useful and more used (Eric)
     494 * Review existing components, identifying obsolete/duplicate, and possibly contributing to a documentation page about existing components and their coverage
     495   * No volunteer but remains an important action
     496 * QWG templates
     497   * Other MW support: wait for EMI to see if there is a real need
     498   * generic service support: Christos ready to work on it in the coming months
     499   * VM support: to be done in collaboration with StratusLab
     500   * Integration with monitoring: see previous discussion
     501
     502Dissemination
     503 * Must remain/be a strong activity for the community: enlarging the community is a way to pave the way for the future
     504 * Proposal to make presentations at the EGI conferences and establish contact with NGIs
     505   * A booth/demo, a poster or a presentation?
     506   * Could take the opportunity of doing something in common with StratusLab at the first EGI conference
     507   * A presentation based on RAL experience?
     508 * Try to be present in NGI meetings
     509 * Increase our visibility: be present on sites like Oloho
     510 * Make a list of conference useful to attend, in particular sysadmins conference
     511   * Wiki page about events and conferences of interest
     512 * Training harder without funding, will also require work to get the appropriate material
     513 * Appliance: StratusLab has a need for it, may come as an outcome of the collaboration
     514 * COSTS project: possibility to get funding for dissemination actions but deadline very close (26/3)
     515   * 1st application only 4 pages (10K words), more detailed application later
     516   * Up to 100KE/year during 4 years
     517   * People (not institutions) from 5 countries
     518   * 3/4 of proposal passing the 1st stage being funded
     519   * Attempt to apply based on QUEST proposal and members + BELNET (Cal/Michel)
     520 
     521Documentation
     522 * Clarify the different targets for the documentation
     523   * General communication: a basis exists on MediaWiki, need to develop, in particular use case study
     524   * User documentation: mainly concentrated on QWG templates, missing bits (in particular components)
     525     * Need to ask users/NGIs what they need
     526     * Lack of step-by-step guides
     527   * Documentation for developpers
     528     * Many things missing
     529     * Need to document the build tools when we agreed on which ones to use
     530 * Existing documentation review (Andrea)
     531 
     532Commercial support and consultancy
     533 * No big interest in the community right now
     534 
     535Long-term organization of the community
     536 * Legal entity behind the name to support the branding with official logos, presentation layouts...
     537   * Probably not a short-term action
     538 * Licensing cleanup: ask PLUME people if they are still ready to contribute without funding
     539
     540Quattor toolkit component status
     541 * AII: nothing major, maintained by Luis
     542   * Nick has some contributions pending
     543 * SPMA: still maintained, minor modifications
     544   * ncm-spma review and enhancements: schema adjustements (repository), function rewrite (Victor)
     545 * rpmt-py: no maintainer but no maintenance needed so far... German is the author.
     546 * panc: see discussion, maintained/developped by Cal
     547 * CCM: last contributor/maintainer was Nick
     548   * Need to enhance CCM to be able to handle gzip profiles without ungizipping them at Apache level
     549 * ncm-cdispd/ncm-ncd: Nick is the last one who had a look at it
     550   * Also the new daemon written by Nick to act a proxy for managing non Linux boxes
     551   * Add ability to run dependendy only if there was a config change affecting them
     552   * Tracking/querying status of last component run: mod may be already done by Nick
     553 * ncm-query: Michel maintainer but no change foreseen
     554 * FUSE file system to browse configuration on client (`ncm-query` alternative)
     555 * CDB: maintenance done to use last panc compiler (CERN)
     556   * cdb-sync may be of broader use: SCDB may have to use it to take benefit of ncm-cdispd alternative
     557 * ncm-templates: a template processor used in components, not really maintained but works!
     558 * perl-CAF/perl-LC: actively maintained by Luis
     559 
     560SINDES: an external potentially useful component, should check the status and the accessibility outside CERN
     561 * No longer any maintenance at CERN, frozen
     562 * Any possibility to add it to Quattor repository?
     563   * RAL to drive the effort, Veronique to check with CERN
     564
     565Worshop preparation is now the responsibility of monthly meeting.
     566
     567== Conclusion ==
     568
     569Next meeting
     570 * Several proposals: Philips (Eindhoven), RAL, Strasbourg
     571 * After a vote, RAL choosen if they confirm they can organize it
     572 * Sites are welcome to express their interest in hosting a workshop
     573 * 2+1 days
     574 
     575
     576