ࡱ> ~U@ ibjbj4p14e888L---8-t`.LLIh..(...///IIIIIII$(KRzMd5IE83//335I..zI=7=7=73R.8.I=73I=7J=77F|"8H.. `KV- 6p[GII0ImGM{6M$HLLH\M8kH/,0=71m2///5I5ILL07(LL0European SCRF Forum Kick-off Meeting 7/8 April 2005 DESY / Hamburg Minutes of the Meeting Introduction and Background Presentations at the meeting Statements by the participants Conclusion of the Meeting Questions to be addressed Appendices Agenda of the meeting List of participants Introduction and Background During the last two years two major events have provided a strong basis for the future perspectives of superconducting RF linear accelerators: One was the decision by the German government in 2003 to propose to host the European XFEL and to contribute 50% of the construction cost. This new instrument of science uses as driver a superconducting 20 GeV linear accelerator, built in a technology which was considerable advanced during the past decade by the TESLA collaboration. The overall cost of the XFEL facility is around 0.7 B . The second event was the decision of the particle physics community to build the next major accelerator, the International Linear Collider (ILC), using the superconducting RF technology developed by the TESLA collaboration. The arguments to choose this technology were based on technical and accelerator related reasons, but also on the many synergies between the ILC and XFEL development. The overall cost of the ILC is several B . The decision to select the SCRF technology for the ILC was also based on the success of the TESLA test facility (TTF) at DESY in Hamburg which was built with the strong involvement of European companies and has been in operation since 1996. TTF has thereby added to the solid base of know-how of the European industry in the field of SCRF accelerators. The technology decision has triggered substantial industrial interest in this technology also in the US and in Asia. In discussions with companies which have already provided components for TTF the idea emerged that it might be useful to create a European Superconducting RF Forum with the following mandate: Create a European industrial base for the European XFEL and the future International Linear Collider Serve as point of contact between i) European industry active and interested in all aspects of SCRF accelerators, ii) European accelerator laboratories, scientists and engineers, iii) the European Union, and iv) accelerator laboratories in Asia and the US Strengthen the discussion between industry and politics Develop ways of co-operation and knowledge transfer between the partners Provide all partners with a regular up-date of the project developments, e.g. through seminars The kick-off meeting of the Forum took place at DESY on 7/8 April 2005 and was attended by nearly 100 participants representing more than 40 companies and institutes. These minutes summarise the discussions at the meeting and the major results. Presentations at the meeting The meeting started on April 7 with an Introduction to the SCRF Forum by Albrecht Wagner, Chairman of the Board of Directors at DESY. He welcomed the participants and introduced the agenda of the meeting. Main points of his presentation were a demonstration of the background and the scope of a possible European SCRF Forum, the European and Global relations of the large SCRF projects, the importance of a close relation between science and industry as well as examples for the collaboration of these two in other Fora. Alexander Gamp, Deputy to the Director of Accelerators at DESY, than started the project oriented talks with a "Presentation of the VUV-FEL. He presented the scientific background of the SASE principle as well as an overview of the technological endeavours needed to transform the TTF facility at DESY into the VUV-FEL which will allow for the first user operation in June 2005. The Presentation of the XFEL delivered by Reinhard Brinkmann, the XFEL Project Leader at DESY, provided the participants with a detailed report on the current status of the technical and organisational progress of this European User Facility, and the technical goals and options for the future operation of the XFEL. Nick Walker, DESYs Project Leader for the ILC, gave the Presentation of the ILC. After an introduction into the general principles and the history of the development of the future linear collider he focussed on the different elements and technical options for the needed accelerator system, closing his talk with the prospects of the ILC. In his "Presentation of other SCRF Projects, Dieter Proch, SCRF Group Leader at DESY, gave an overview on some of the scientific projects based on this technology which are planned throughout the world. His presentation included new applications to this technology in fields like proton, heavy ion and electron linacs. The conclusion of his talk was that these projects might come close in volume to the big projects like the XFEL or even the ILC. Finally, at the closing of the first day of the workshop Dieter Trines, Director of Accelerators at DESY, presented a "Proposal for a European SCRF Forum. His presentation included basic thoughts on structure and actions of the Forum and provided the frame for the discussions on the following day. Statements by the participants On Friday, 8 April, the Forum continued with statements by all participants in which they expressed the clear need for and their support of such a Forum. During the discussion the following comments were made concerning the goals and role of the Forum: The leading position of European science and industry in SCRF needs further strengthening. The Forum can help in this respect. Core components for the SCRF technology need long-term partnership by science and industry as they are not off-the-shelf products. The Forum can enable such partnerships. The Forum should act as a distributor for first-hand information on SCRF projects. For participating companies it is valuable to know, what the other companies do or can do. Niobium producers (and other suppliers of raw materials and semi-finished parts) need reliable information about the projects time frame to incorporate the Niobium (product) requirement into their standard activities and their chain of production. The goals of the Forum should be defined precisely. The main tasks of the Forum should be the exchange of ideas and know-how and the generation of a strong political funding support. Active backing by industry is not only sensible and important but may be decisive to convince funding agencies of especially the larger SCRF projects. The Forum should try to urge the funding agencies to take decisions on project funding well before the projects actual start to be able to plan out production schedules. The Forum should provide industry with time lines for the different projects as these are important for the planning process in industry. Producers of vacuum pumps will not play an important role in the SCRF projects itself as the share for this technology is maximum 2%. But on the other hand many of the suppliers for SCRF system parts need classical vacuum technology for their production of components. The Forum could thus act as a contact place for all companies concerned. The Forum is a valuable chance for especially small companies as they have special needs and need personal networks like this one. A European SCRF network could be an enhancement of the existing personal networks. The Forum thus could act as an agent for industrial co-operation. The Forum should include small as well as large companies. The Forum should provide project scientists with information about the capability (service, production and technology) of industry. The SCRF market has to be stabilised from the business point of view. Companies send people to this Forum because there are hopes that it pays at least through small projects. Projects can not rely on only one supplier for core components. The Forum should enable the participants to maintain a high level of competitiveness in Europe, thus keeping European research money in Europe. The Forum should be a central point of access for non-members to feed their ideas, opinions and possibilities to the European SCRF community. Tendering processes should be made transparent by the Forum. Technical conferences by industry and science could be held to exchange and discuss technical ideas. The European Union will very likely be in favour of this Forum as it is clearly European and multinational. A number of comments were made with respect to the role of the International Linear Collider in the context of the Forum: The scientific decision of ICFA to use SCRF for the ILC has changed everything as each Lab now backs this technology. Without the ILC we wont sit here now. So we should focus on the ILC. The smaller projects are in its shadow. ILC is now more than a vision, it has come much closer. A clear position of the European industry concerning the ILC should be articulated. No one knows when and where the ILC will be built. The European share (industrial and scientific) in it could be more than one third. The ILC will be a global experiment with parts and control from all around the world a bit like Airbus is for the European aviation industry. In addition, the following comments were made: The scientific decision in favour of the SCRF technology is noticeable in all world regions and their markets. This Forum offers added value for the involved companies. All companies and institutions involved in the Forum should be given the opportunity for an input to the work of the Constitutional Group in advance and after the preparation of first suggestions. The Committee for Fusion Industries (CFI) in Europe is a quite powerful body within the area of fusion the Forum should try to reach a similar importance. The Faraday partnership in Great Britain is a very good working example for cooperation of science and industry. There is a certain overlap of tasks and aims with this Forum. Complicated rules (e.g. bureaucratic procedures for safety, tendering ) in Europe add cost. The search for additional suppliers is certainly a risk for those suppliers which are already in business. We will only know if the Forum is successful if we give it a try. Conclusion of the Meeting The participants of the Forum agreed to the following decisions: The formation of a European SCRF Forum is desirable. Thus a Constitutional Assembly for a European SCRF Forum should be held within the near future. The Constitutional Assembly and the necessary Statutes for the Forum should be prepared by a Constitutional Group which consists of the following members: From Laboratories: Christian Arnault LAL FR Mike Dykes ASTEC UK Llus Miralles CELLS ES Carlo Pagani INFN IT Dieter Trines DESY DE From Companies: Giorgio Corniani Zanon IT Kurt Ebbinghaus ad personam DE Michael Peiniger Accel DE Luigi Rebuffi Thales FR Javier Romero Ruiz CDTI ES Pieter van Otterloo Dutch Scientific NL David Wilcox E2V UK Secretary: Karsten Wurr DESY DE The results of the Constitutional Groups work should be communicated in time before the Constitutional Assembly to all interested laboratories, companies and institutions. All information concerning the current meeting including the presentations will be provided to all participants. Questions to be addressed The following questions brought forward by the participants will have to be addressed by further meetings of the Forum. The Constitutional Group and - after its election - the Coordination Board will try to work out recommendations how to take care of these in the future. How to deal with countries whose governments have not signed the XFEL-MoU or shown significant interest in e.g. the ILC? How can the members (companies, labs and institutions) be represented by the Committee? Hopefully there will be a much higher number of countries and industry sectors in the Forum as the Committee may have representatives. Should a website of the forum include short descriptions of participating companies to inform about the areas of interest and competence of all participating companies? What is the scope of the industrial part of the Committee? How can the success of the Forum be measured? How can the funding gap for industrial research (between basic research and final production) be closed for the SCRF technology? What funding is needed and how is it achieved? How many meetings will be held by the Forum? Which other Forum could serve as example? How can other stakeholders like users, governments be included? Is an advisory committee the right measure? How will the interest of science and industry shift in case of the ILC being built outside of Europe? Should the profile of the Forum be sharpened towards the ILC even in its name? How do the road maps with short, mean and major targets look like? Will European distributors of foreign producers be allowed as guests or as members in the Forum and may they play a leading role, e.g. in a steering committee?  &45DEFG^_a|}    % ' µ樛}}s}fXNNhwNOJQJ^Jhxhx5OJQJ^Jh2hfd>OJQJ^Jhfd>OJQJ^JhlOJQJ^JhxOJQJ^Jhr~OJQJ^Jh2h2OJQJ^Jh2h,TOJQJ^Jh2h$OJQJ^Jh2hF[5OJQJ^JhF[5OJQJ^Jh,T5OJQJ^Jh2h,T5OJQJ^Jhx5OJQJ^J%&56EFG^_`a} $a$gdxgdx & F5^5gdr~ & F5^5gd2$a$gd2$a$gd,TTiii & ' * F G \ vO` QQx^Qgdr~ & Fxgdr~ $xa$gdr~gdr~ & Fgdfd>h^hgdr~gd,T & Fgdx' ( ) * E F G  ,4~ 06QS=NO_`fȽȬᬞᬞha VCJOJQJ^JaJh!CJOJQJ^JaJ hwNhr~CJOJQJ^JaJhfd>5OJQJ^Jhr~5OJQJ^Jhfd>CJOJQJ^JaJhr~CJOJQJ^JaJ h2h,TCJOJQJ^JaJ4`a  gdwNgd,T & FgdwN$a$gd: & Fgdfd>gdr~xgdr~S[^mt  !RdoxҲҤҖz҈҈҈lzZHz#hh5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hh:Q5CJOJQJ^JaJha VCJOJQJ^JaJhfGCCJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJh CJOJQJ^JaJh`CJOJQJ^JaJ#h:Qh:Q5CJOJQJ^JaJh!CJOJQJ^JaJh:QCJOJQJ^JaJ h:Qhr~CJOJQJ^JaJh2hr~5OJQJ^J _af~>LMTUV]䥔ֆtbt#hz}h:Q5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hz}hz}5CJOJQJ^JaJhz}CJOJQJ^JaJ h:QhL@CJOJQJ^JaJh:QCJOJQJ^JaJ#hL@h:Q5CJOJQJ^JaJ h:Qh:QCJOJQJ^JaJhfGCCJOJQJ^JaJhL@CJOJQJ^JaJhCJOJQJ^JaJ$DE#$%',2EMNOabcnoz'/<FGJ\b᳢ᐳqccccch:CJOJQJ^JaJha VCJOJQJ^JaJ h:h:CJOJQJ^JaJ#hz}hz}5CJOJQJ^JaJ h:Qh:QCJOJQJ^JaJ#hz}h:Q5CJOJQJ^JaJhfGCCJOJQJ^JaJh CJOJQJ^JaJhz}CJOJQJ^JaJ hz}hz}CJOJQJ^JaJ&bk~$123UV±ucuUGhr~CJOJQJ^JaJh:QCJOJQJ^JaJ#hz}h:Q5CJOJQJ^JaJ#hz}hz}5CJOJQJ^JaJhz}CJOJQJ^JaJhfGCCJOJQJ^JaJh/tCJOJQJ^JaJ h:Qh:QCJOJQJ^JaJ h:h:QCJOJQJ^JaJh CJOJQJ^JaJ h:h:CJOJQJ^JaJh:CJOJQJ^JaJ    ? W _ e !4!˺n]OAOAh`CJOJQJ^JaJhRCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNh CJOJQJ^JaJ hwNh9lCJOJQJ^JaJh CJOJQJ^JaJhwNCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNhwNCJOJQJ^JaJh9lCJOJQJ^JaJ h2h,TCJOJQJ^JaJh2hwN5OJQJ^JhwN5OJQJ^Jhr~CJOJQJ^JaJhlCJOJQJ^JaJ 5!!!"##+$$a%&'(((E))*** & Fx^`gdbmP & Fx^`gda V & Fx^`gd:QgdwN4!5!8!#"$""""""##6#:#+$]$d$$$$$$$$$$$%`%%%&&''''ŷŦŦvhZZh&8CJOJQJ^JaJhfGCCJOJQJ^JaJ hbmPhbmPCJOJQJ^JaJhbmPCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNhbmPCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNha VCJOJQJ^JaJhwNCJOJQJ^JaJha VCJOJQJ^JaJh CJOJQJ^JaJhRCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNhwNCJOJQJ^JaJ#'((?((((E)U)))))))*!*]+h+++++G,,,----".#......秊yhyhyhyhyhyy hwNhlCJOJQJ^JaJhlCJOJQJ^JaJh/tCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNht#kCJOJQJ^JaJh9lCJOJQJ^JaJhRCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNhbmPCJOJQJ^JaJhbmPCJOJQJ^JaJhwNCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNhwNCJOJQJ^JaJ$*E+++,,-,,-I--#...../V0012 & Fx^`gdR & Fx^`gdbmP & Fx^`gdlgd9lxgdR & Fx^`gd:Q...////V0Z0{0~000000000001112<2B2j2k2}222222бᒱseseseh/tCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNh/tCJOJQJ^JaJh CJOJQJ^JaJ hwNhlCJOJQJ^JaJhlCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNhRCJOJQJ^JaJhbmPCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNhbmPCJOJQJ^JaJhRCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNh9lCJOJQJ^JaJ"2k222222 3 33<4=4l44444p7$8$H$^p`gdr~`gdr~ & Fgdr~ & Fx^`gdr~gdr~ & Fgdr~$a$gdr~ & Fx^`gd/t & Fx^`gdl222222222263?333l44455556"6666667ȷ򷩷򷩷n]Oht#kCJOJQJ^JaJ h:Qhr~CJOJQJ^JaJ h:QhlCJOJQJ^JaJ(hwNhr~CJOJQJ^JaJmHsH(hr~hr~CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH h CJOJQJ^JaJ hwNhr~CJOJQJ^JaJ h2hr~CJOJQJ^JaJh2hr~5OJQJ^Jhl5OJQJ^Jhr~CJOJQJ^JaJ445!5>5Y5v5555556666667 & Fgdt#kgd,T$a$gdr~ & Fgdr~ & Fx^`gdr~ 7$8$H$`gdr~ 7$8$H$gdr~p7$8$H$^p`gdr~^gdr~gdr~77777 777+8-888999992:::|;;;;<<=ͼ~p~b~bQb~~C~C~~hbmPCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNha VCJOJQJ^JaJha VCJOJQJ^JaJhlCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNht#kCJOJQJ^JaJ hSht#kCJOJQJ^JaJh&8CJOJQJ^JaJhSCJOJQJ^JaJ hShSCJOJQJ^JaJht#kCJOJQJ^JaJh2ht#k5OJQJ^Jhl5OJQJ^Jht#k5OJQJ^J77,8-8894:q:: ;O;|;;<z<<==nhhiiQiRigdt#kxgd!'2 & Fx^`gda V & Fx^`gd:Qgd,TWill the different technical areas (cryogenics, rf , cavities etc.) be represented in the Steering Committee? How much co-operation may be achieved by member companies which are competitors? Which measures are reasonable to minimize bureaucratic obstacles for the SCRF technology? These questions will be taken up in the next meetings. - DRAFT - European SCRF Forum Minutes of the Kick-off Meeting Page  PAGE 6 of  NUMPAGES 6 =hhhhhhiiPiQiSiTi^i_iaiuiiiiiii´쒆tctcNcN;%ha VCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu)jht#kh:QCJOJQJU^JaJ ht#kh:QCJOJQJ^JaJh:QCJOJQJ^JaJh:Qht#kh:Q6mHsH h2ht#kCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNh!'2CJOJQJ^JaJh!'2CJOJQJ^JaJht#kCJOJQJ^JaJh&8CJOJQJ^JaJhbmPCJOJQJ^JaJ hwNht#kCJOJQJ^JaJURiSiTi^i_i`iaiiiiiiii &d P $a$gdt#kgd,Tgdt#k iiiiiiiiiiiiii¾ h2ht#kCJOJQJ^JaJhSh&8ha Vh:Q%ha VCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu ht#kh:QCJOJQJ^JaJ)jht#kh:QCJOJQJU^JaJ 21h:p,T. A!n"n#$n% D@D ,TStandardCJ_HaJmH sH tH JA@J Absatz-StandardschriftartXi@X Normale Tabelle4 l4a 0k@0 Keine Liste4U@4 ,T Hyperlink >*phz@z ,TTabellengitternetz7:V0:@: t#k Kopfzeile  p#8 @"8 t#kFuzeile  p#P2P &8SprechblasentextCJOJQJ^JaJ44p%&56EFG^_`a}&'*FG] -~ F     &'9:9:d @Z>tD t [!\!!@"x""R###$$$%"&&/''''''':(;((k)l)))))**/*P*m****** + ++*,+,,,-,.,I,J,[-\--.c///O0~000C111=22K3333.4/40414;4<4=4>4444444000000000000 0 0 0 0 00000 0 000 0000000 0* 0*0000 0* 0* 0*0000 0000000000000000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  0  0  0  0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0  0! 0"00 0000 0# 0$00000000000000000 0% 0&0(0(00 0000 0' 0 0( 0` 0 0` 0 0` 0` 0` 0 0 0` 0` 0 0 0`00`0`00@0@0@0@0@0@00 8000%&56EFG^_`a}&'*FG] -~ F     &'9:9:d@Z>tD t [!\!!@"x""R###$$$%"&&/''''''':(;((k)l)))))**/*P*m****** + ++*,+,,,-,.,I,J,[-\--.c///O0~000C111=22K3333.4/4044000000000000 0 0 0 0 00000 0 000 0000000 0* 0*0000 0* 0* 0*0000 0000000000000000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  0  0  0  0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0  0!00 0000 0" 0#00000000000000000 0$ 0%0000 00(0(0 0 0 0 0` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0` 0` 0 0 0`00`0`00 dddg' b4!'.27=ii#%&'()+,.0257*247Rii "$*-/136i!FMOT_ag!8@0(  B S  ?4w4w41w41wlwwwwww4wLwwwwwDwww\wf wDf == U <%=&=&')**14     DD aB%J&J&#')**14 9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace> *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PersonNameB*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-region9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsState   -. , 0 \a_e ?)))))))))**"*$*)*C*K*X*`*b*g*s*z*|****************--I.K... /a/O0O0 33$4,414w44444444)))* 331444433333aE  :<d"@"$$''* +.,J,14:4444..14444kwurrSwaantje Mette DESY User#.j;u( 4F516 4.i=8BwX^j};f.j808^8`0o(.SS^S`OJQJo(hH pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.808^8`0o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.808^8`0o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH. 808^8`0o(hH. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHopp^p`OJQJo(hH@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoPP^P`OJQJo(hH808^8`0o(.SS^S`OJQJo(hH pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.F516};fBwX;u(.i=#        dU>         8        A8       5'.Ch;?4|#"lx 2!'2fd>L@fGCwNbmP:QRa VX$j\`t#k9l.r/tr~z}SSxo-F[TuF&8,T!:$@..R..@///24P@P PP @P@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial5& zaTahoma?5 z Courier New;Wingdings"1hK&7bZfg,^g,^!n24d44 3QH)?x SCRF ForumkwurrSwaantje Mette$      Oh+'0x  4 @ LX`hp SCRF ForumCRFkwurrorwurwur Normal.dotSwaantje Mette14aMicrosoft Word 10.0@^U@T@:΃Vg,՜.+,D՜.+,< hp  DESYi^4{  SCRF Forum TitelhH8T\_AdHocReviewCycleID_EmailSubject _AuthorEmail_AuthorEmailDisplayName_PreviousAdHocReviewCycleID_ReviewingToolsShownOnce*uMinutesalbrecht.wagner@desy.deWagner, AlbrechtesyT]agn  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012345678:;<=>?@BCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghjklmnoprstuvwx{Root Entry Fp)\V}Data 91TableANWordDocument4pSummaryInformation(iDocumentSummaryInformation8qCompObjj  FMicrosoft Word-Dokument MSWordDocWord.Document.89qRoot Entry F#d9WData 91TableANWordDocument4p  !"#$%&'()*+,-./012345678:;<=>?@BCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghjklmnop _AdHocReviewCycleID_EmailSubject _AuthorEmail_AuthorEmailDisplayName_PreviousAdHocReviewCycleID_ReviewingToolsShownOnceKĘ*u9European SCRF - Kick-off Meeting - Minutes and Documentskarsten.wurr@desy.deWurr, KarstenSummaryInformation(iDocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjj  FMicrosoft Word-Dokument MSWordDocWord.Document.89q՜.+,D՜.+,< hp  DESYi^4{  SCRF Forum Titel@