Changeset 550 in ETALON for papers/2016_IPAC/IPAC16_SP_CTR/MOPMB003.tex

Timestamp:

Apr 26, 2016, 3:16:27 PM (8 years ago)

Author:

hodnevuc

Message:

 

File:

• papers/2016_IPAC/IPAC16_SP_CTR/MOPMB003.tex (modified) (3 diffs)

papers/2016_IPAC/IPAC16_SP_CTR/MOPMB003.tex

@@ -49 +49 @@
 \label{eq:eq2}
 \end{equation}
-where $q_0$ is electron charge, c is the speed of light, $\beta$  is relativistic velocity and $\Theta$ is
+where $q_0$ is electron charge, $\epsilon_0$ -- vacuum permittivity, c is the speed of light, $\beta$  is relativistic velocity and $\Theta$ is
 the observation angle.
 
@@ -152 +152 @@
   \centering
   \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{plots/TE.eps}
-  \caption{Total energy for SP effect presented as function of pulsewidth and grating pitch. Grating is $40\times180$mm with  $30^o$ blaze angle. }
+  \caption{Total energy for SP effect presented as function of pulsewidth and grating pitch. Grating is $40mm\times180mm$ with  $30^o$ blaze angle. }
   \label{Epp}
 \end{figure}
@@ -203 +203 @@
 
 \section{Conclusion}
-We have studied both CSPR and CTR and studied how to optimize the experimental parameters. Using the CLIO parameters we expect a signal (in the range 0.3-3 THz [ 0.1 - 1 mm]) of 5.3e-7 J for CSPR and 1.86e-06 J for CTR   with 50 mm parabolic mirror at distance 300mm from grating.\par
+We have studied both CSPR and CTR and studied how to optimize the experimental parameters. Using the CLIO parameters we expect a signal (in the range 0.03-3 THz [ 0.1 - 10 mm]) of 8.37e-7 J for CSPR and 7.35e-08 J for CTR.\par