- Timestamp:
- Sep 8, 2009, 2:50:08 PM (15 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
-
Selma/PARISROC/parisroc-jinst.tex (modified) (53 diffs)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
Selma/PARISROC/parisroc-jinst.tex
r473 r474 1 1 \documentclass{JINST} 2 2 \usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx} 3 \graphicspath{{figures/}} 3 4 \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating} 4 5 %\usepackage{graphicx} … … 92 93 Si-Ge Read Out Chip. 93 94 94 \begin{figure}[ htb]95 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 95 96 \begin{center} 96 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth ]{img0.jpg}97 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img1.jpg} 97 98 \caption{Principal of PMm2 proposal for megaton scale Cerenkov water 98 99 tank.} … … 120 121 121 122 \begin{center} 122 \begin{figure}[ htb]123 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img1.eps}123 \begin{figure}[!!htbp] 124 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img2.jpg} 124 125 \caption{Principle of the PMm2 project.} 125 126 \label{fig:2} … … 133 134 134 135 \begin{center} 135 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]136 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img2.eps}136 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 137 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img3.jpg} 137 138 \caption{PARISROC global schematic.} 138 139 \label{fig:3} … … 173 174 174 175 \begin{center} 175 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]176 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img3.eps}176 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 177 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img4.jpg} 177 178 \caption{PARISROC Layout.} 178 179 \label{fig:4} … … 187 188 188 189 \begin{center} 189 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]190 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img4.eps}190 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 191 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img5.jpg} 191 192 \caption{PARISROC one channel analogue part schematic.} 192 193 \label{fig:5} … … 207 208 208 209 \begin{center} 209 \begin{figure}[ htb]210 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img5.eps}210 \begin{figure}[!htb] 211 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img6.jpg} 211 212 \caption{PARISROC preamplifier schematic.} 212 213 \label{fig:6} … … 239 240 240 241 \begin{center} 241 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 242 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img6.eps}%%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img7.eps} 243 \caption{Simulated preamplifier output waveforms for different input 242 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 243 \begin{tabular}{rl} 244 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img7a.jpg} & 245 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img7b.jpg} 246 \end{tabular} 247 caption{Simulated preamplifier output waveforms for different input 244 248 signals with fixed gain (left panel) and for fixed input 245 249 signal at different gain (different input capacitor values (right … … 256 260 257 261 \begin{center} 258 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]259 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img8.eps}262 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 263 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img8.jpg} 260 264 \caption{Simulation input signal.} 261 265 \label{fig:8} … … 268 272 269 273 \begin{center} 270 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]271 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img9.eps}274 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 275 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img9.jpg} 272 276 \caption{Preamplifier linearity.} 273 277 \label{fig:9} … … 298 302 299 303 \begin{center} 300 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]301 \ %%includegraphics{img10.eps}304 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 305 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img10.jpg} 302 306 \caption{Preamplifier noise simulation; $G_{pa}=8$; $C_{in}=4$~pF and 303 307 $C_{f}=0.5$~pF.} … … 329 333 It has a classical design: differential pair is followed by a buffer. 330 334 331 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]332 \centering 333 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img11.eps}335 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 336 \centering 337 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img11.jpg} 334 338 \caption{Fast shaper schematics.} 335 339 \label{fig:11} … … 340 344 shaper principal characteristics obtained in simulation. 341 345 342 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 343 \centering 344 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img12.eps} 345 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img13.eps} 346 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 347 \centering 348 \begin{tabular}{rl} 349 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img12a.jpg} & 350 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img12b.jpg} 351 \end{tabular} 346 352 \caption{Simulated fast shaper outputs ($G_{pa} = 8$ with input from 1-10~pe (left panel) 347 353 and from 1/3~pe to 2~pe (right panel).} … … 378 384 379 385 380 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 381 \centering 382 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img14.eps} 383 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img15.eps} 386 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 387 \centering 388 \begin{tabular}{rl} 389 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img13a.jpg}& 390 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img13b.jpg} 391 \end{tabular} 384 392 \caption{Simulated trigger output (input charge from 0 to 10~p.e; 385 393 threshold at 1/3~p.e). Zoom of trigger rise time on right … … 394 402 measurement as well as for charge measurement. 395 403 396 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]397 \centering 398 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img16.eps}404 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 405 \centering 406 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img14.jpg} 399 407 \caption{SCA (switched capacitor array) scheme.} 400 408 \label{fig:14} … … 408 416 the digital part. 409 417 410 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]411 \centering 412 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img17.eps}418 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 419 \centering 420 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img15.jpg} 413 421 \caption{Operation of T\&H cell.} 414 422 \label{fig:15} … … 436 444 good noise performance. 437 445 438 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 439 \centering 440 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img18.eps} 441 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img19.eps} 446 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 447 \centering 448 \begin{tabular}{rl} 449 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img16a.jpg}& 450 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img16b.jpg} 451 \end{tabular} 442 452 \caption{Slow shaper output waveforms simulation (left panel). Slow shaper 443 453 output noise simulation (right panel).} … … 472 482 $T_p=200$~ns. 473 483 474 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]475 \centering 476 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth][width=273pt]{img20.eps}484 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 485 \centering 486 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img17.jpg} 477 487 \caption{Slow shaper linearity simulation.} 478 488 \label{fig:17} … … 499 509 signals. 500 510 501 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]502 \centering 503 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth][width=207pt]{img21.eps}511 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 512 \centering 513 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img18.jpg} 504 514 \caption{Slow shaper \& SCA simulation.} 505 515 \label{fig:18} … … 522 532 and the falling signal stop the ramp (\refFig{fig:19}). 523 533 524 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 525 \centering 526 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img22.eps} 527 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img23.eps} 534 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 535 \centering 536 \begin{tabular}{rl} 537 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img19a.jpg}& 538 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img19b.jpg} 539 \end{tabular} 528 540 \caption{TDC Ramp general schematic.} 529 541 \label{fig:19} … … 534 546 ramps. 535 547 536 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]537 \centering 538 %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img24.eps}548 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 549 \centering 550 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img20.jpg} 539 551 \caption{TDC Ramp.} 540 552 \label{fig:20} … … 546 558 (\refFig{fig:21} and \refFig{fig:22}). 547 559 548 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]549 \centering 550 %\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img25.eps}560 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 561 \centering 562 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img21.jpg} 551 563 \caption{TDC Ramp scheme.} 552 564 \label{fig:21} 553 565 \end{figure} 554 566 555 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]556 \centering 557 %\includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth]{img26.eps}567 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 568 \centering 569 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img22.jpg} 558 570 \caption{TDC Ramp simulation.} 559 571 \label{fig:22} … … 572 584 current. \refTab{tab:6} gives, for each ramp, the time duration to reach 3.3~V. 573 585 574 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]575 \centering 576 %\includegraphics{img27.eps}586 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 587 \centering 588 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img23.jpg} 577 589 \caption{ADC ramp schematic.} 578 590 \label{fig:23} … … 609 621 610 622 611 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]612 \centering 613 %\includegraphics{img28.eps}623 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 624 \centering 625 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img24.jpg} 614 626 \caption{Block diagram of the digital part.} 615 627 \label{fig:24} … … 624 636 the sequence shown in on \refFig{fig:25}. 625 637 626 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]627 \centering 628 %\includegraphics{img29.eps}638 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 639 \centering 640 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img25.jpg} 629 641 \caption{Top manager sequence.} 630 642 \label{fig:25} … … 641 653 642 654 643 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]644 \centering 645 %\includegraphics{img30.eps}655 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 656 \centering 657 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img26.jpg} 646 658 \caption{SCA analogue voltage} 647 659 \label{fig:26} … … 682 694 The Labview is developed by LAL. 683 695 684 \begin{figure}[ h]685 \centering 686 %\includegraphics{img31.eps}696 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 697 \centering 698 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img27.jpg} 687 699 \caption{Test Board.} 688 700 \label{fig:27} … … 697 709 run labview program. 698 710 699 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]700 \centering 701 %\includegraphics{img32.eps}711 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 712 \centering 713 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img28.jpg} 702 714 \caption{Test Bench.} 703 715 \label{fig:28} … … 710 722 signal and its characteristics. 711 723 712 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]713 \centering 714 %\includegraphics{img33.eps}715 % \includegraphics{img34.eps}724 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 725 \centering 726 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img29.jpg} 727 %%%% NOT USED \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img34.jpg} 716 728 \caption{Input signals} 717 729 \label{fig:29} … … 739 751 shaper and the fast shaper (\refTab{tab:7}). 740 752 741 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 742 \centering 743 %\includegraphics{img35.eps} 744 %\includegraphics{img36.eps} 745 %\includegraphics{img37.eps} 753 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 754 \centering 755 \begin{tabular}{c} 756 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img30a.jpg}\\ 757 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img30b.jpg}\\ 758 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img30c.jpg} 759 \end{tabular} 746 760 \caption{DC uniformity.} 747 761 \label{fig:30} … … 771 785 board. 772 786 773 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 774 \centering 775 %\includegraphics{img38.eps} 776 %\includegraphics{img39.eps} 787 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 788 \centering 789 \begin{tabular}{rl} 790 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img31a.jpg}& 791 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img31b.jpg} 792 \end{tabular} 777 793 \caption{Measurement and simulation of the preamplifier output for 778 794 an input charge of 10~pe.} … … 808 824 performance (\refTab{tab:9}). 809 825 810 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 811 \centering 812 %\includegraphics{img40.eps} 813 %\includegraphics{img41.eps} 826 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 827 \centering 828 \begin{tabular}{rl} 829 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img32a.jpg} 830 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img32b.jpg} 831 \end{tabular} 814 832 \caption{Measurement and simulation of the slow shaper output for an 815 833 input charge of 10~pe.} … … 837 855 The Fast shaper results are shown in \refFig{fig:33} 838 856 and \refTab{tab:10}. 839 \begin{figure}[ htb]857 \begin{figure}[!htb] 840 858 \centering 841 %\includegraphics{img73.eps} 842 %\includegraphics{img72.eps} 859 \begin{tabular}{rl} 860 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img33a.jpg} 861 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img33b.jpg} 862 \end{tabular} 843 863 \caption{Measurement and simulation of the fast shaper output for an 844 864 input charge of 1 pe.} … … 870 890 smaller dynamic range than simulation. 871 891 872 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 873 \centering 874 %\includegraphics{img42.eps} 875 %\includegraphics{img43.eps} 876 %\includegraphics{img44.eps} 892 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 893 \centering 894 \begin{tabular}{c} 895 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img34a.jpg} 896 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img34b.jpg} 897 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img34c.jpg} 898 \end{tabular} 877 899 \caption{Preamplifier linearity for different gains.} 878 900 \label{fig:34} … … 899 921 with residuals better than $pm 1~\%$. 900 922 901 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]902 \centering 903 %\includegraphics{img45.eps}923 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 924 \centering 925 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img35.jpg} 904 926 \caption{Slow shaper linearity; $RC =50$~ns and $G_{pa}=8$.} 905 927 \label{fig:35} … … 910 932 are obtained. 911 933 912 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]913 \centering 914 %\includegraphics{img46.eps}934 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 935 \centering 936 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img36.jpg} 915 937 \caption{Fast shaper linearity up to 10~pe.} 916 938 \label{fig:36} … … 922 944 adjustment linearity is nice at 2~\% on 8 bits. 923 945 924 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]925 \centering 926 %\includegraphics{img47.eps}946 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 947 \centering 948 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img37.jpg} 927 949 \caption{Preamplifier linearity vs feedback capacitor value.} 928 950 \label{fig:37} … … 936 958 2. 937 959 938 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]939 \centering 940 %\includegraphics{img48.eps}960 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 961 \centering 962 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img38.jpg} 941 963 \caption{Gain uniformity for $G_{pa}=8, 4, 2$.} 942 964 \label{fig:38} … … 952 974 DACs and residuals from $-0.1~\%$ to $0.1~\%$. 953 975 954 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 955 \centering 956 %\includegraphics{img49.eps} 957 %\includegraphics{img50.eps} 976 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 977 \centering 978 \begin{tabular}{rl} 979 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img39a.jpg}& 980 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img39b.jpg} 981 \end{tabular} 958 982 \caption{DAC linearity; DAC1 and DAC2 respectively.} 959 983 \label{fig:39} … … 970 994 is of one DAC count ($LSB DAC = 1.78$~mV) or 0.06~pe. 971 995 972 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]973 \centering 974 %\includegraphics{img51.eps}996 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 997 \centering 998 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img40.jpg} 975 999 \caption{Pedestal S-curves for channel 1 to 16.} 976 1000 \label{fig:40} … … 982 1006 the threshold. The homogeneity is proved by a spread of 7 DAC unit (0.4~pe) and a noise of 0.07 pe ($RMS =2.19$). 983 1007 984 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 985 %\includegraphics{img52.eps} 986 %\includegraphics{img53.eps} 987 %\includegraphics{img54.eps} 1008 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 1009 \centering 1010 \begin{tabular}{rl} 1011 \multicolumn{2}{c}{\includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img41a.jpg}}\\ 1012 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img41b.jpg}& 1013 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img41c.jpg} 1014 \end{tabular} 988 1015 \caption{Fast shaper and trigger (top panel); S-curves for input of 10~pe (left panel); 989 1016 uniformity plot for channel 1 to 16 (right panel).} … … 999 1026 (\refFig{fig:43}). 1000 1027 1001 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 1002 \centering 1003 %\includegraphics{img55.eps} 1004 %\includegraphics{img56.eps} 1028 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 1029 \centering 1030 \begin{tabular}{rl} 1031 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img42a.jpg} 1032 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img42b.jpg} 1033 \end{tabular} 1005 1034 \caption{Trigger efficiency vs DAC count up to 300~pe (left panel) and 1006 1035 until 3~pe (right panel).} … … 1008 1037 \end{figure} 1009 1038 1010 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]1011 \centering 1012 %\includegraphics{img57.eps}1039 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 1040 \centering 1041 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img43.jpg} 1013 1042 \caption{Threshold vs injected charge up to 500~fC. It is shown the 1~p.e threshold for a PMT gain of $10^6$.} 1014 1043 \label{fig:43} … … 1020 1049 due, probably, to the input power supply ($V_{dd-pa}$ and $V_{ss}$). 1021 1050 1022 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]1023 %\includegraphics{img58.eps}1051 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 1052 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img44.jpg} 1024 1053 \caption{Trigger coupling signal.} 1025 1054 \label{fig:44} … … 1044 1073 obtained. 1045 1074 1046 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]1047 \centering 1048 %\includegraphics{img59.eps}1075 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 1076 \centering 1077 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img45.jpg} 1049 1078 \caption{ADC measurements with DC input 1.45~V (middle scale).} 1050 1079 \label{fig:45} … … 1057 1086 and have plots superimposed. 1058 1087 1059 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]1060 \centering 1061 %\includegraphics{img60.eps}1088 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 1089 \centering 1090 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img46.jpg} 1062 1091 \caption{10 bits ADC transfer function vs input charge.} 1063 1092 \label{fig:46} … … 1070 1099 (\refTab{tab:12}). 1071 1100 1072 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 1073 \centering 1074 %\includegraphics{img61.eps} 1075 %\includegraphics{img62.eps} 1101 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 1102 \centering 1103 \begin{tabular}{rl} 1104 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img47a.jpg}& 1105 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img47b.jpg} 1106 \end{tabular} 1076 1107 \caption{Evolution of the fit parameters (slope on the 1077 1108 left panel and intercept on the right panel) as a function of the channel … … 1100 1131 the good ADC behaviour in terms of Integral non linearity. 1101 1132 1102 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 1103 %\includegraphics{img63.eps} 1104 %\includegraphics{img64.eps} 1105 %\includegraphics{img65.eps} 1133 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 1134 \centering 1135 \begin{tabular}{c} 1136 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img48a.jpg}\\ 1137 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img48b.jpg}\\ 1138 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img48c.jpg} 1139 \end{tabular} 1106 1140 \caption{12, 10, 8 bit ADC linearity.} 1107 1141 \label{fig:48} … … 1112 1146 preliminary measurements. 1113 1147 1114 \begin{figure}[htb] 1115 %\includegraphics{img66.eps} 1116 %\includegraphics{img67.eps} 1148 \begin{figure}[!htb] 1149 \centering 1150 \begin{tabular}{rl} 1151 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img49a.jpg} 1152 \includegraphics[width=0.5\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img49b.jpg} 1153 \end{tabular} 1117 1154 \caption{Differential non linearity.} 1118 1155 \label{fig:49} … … 1146 1183 \end{table} 1147 1184 1148 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]1149 \centering 1150 %\includegraphics{img68.eps}1185 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 1186 \centering 1187 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img50.jpg} 1151 1188 \caption{10 bit ADC linearity.} 1152 1189 \label{fig:50} … … 1157 1194 measurements. 1158 1195 1159 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]1160 \centering 1161 %\includegraphics{img69.eps}1196 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 1197 \centering 1198 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img51.jpg} 1162 1199 \caption{8 bit ADC linearity.} 1163 1200 \label{fig:51} … … 1168 1205 value for measurements. 1169 1206 1170 \begin{figure}[hbtp] 1171 %\includegraphics{img70.eps} 1207 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 1208 \centering 1209 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img52.jpg} 1172 1210 \caption{12 bit ADC linearity.} 1173 1211 \label{fig:52} … … 1181 1219 IPNO at Orsay. 1182 1220 1183 \begin{figure}[ hbtp]1184 \centering 1185 %\includegraphics{img71.eps}1221 \begin{figure}[!htbp] 1222 \centering 1223 \includegraphics[width=0.7\columnwidth,height=6cm]{img53.jpg} 1186 1224 \caption{TO BE COMPLETED} 1187 1225 \label{fig:53}
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.
